Builds characterDang I was poor in 2008.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Builds characterDang I was poor in 2008.
So my wife has built a lot of character for me?Builds character
Delayed gratification in today’s world is definitely a tough behavior to model.Being "wealthy" is mostly about saying NO to some things that enable you to say YES to things that you really care about.
I mean, if you have a mortgage on it, the only way to convey the equity against the loan is to include it on the asset side. And I'm sure you wouldn't ignore the cost of a mortgage on any financial statement, so I'm not sure who these "most financial people" are, unless they are saying that for people who own their home free and clear, in which case I think it's only dumb to not include the value of paid off real estate on your worth statement.Most financial people I’ve worked with will tell you not to include your house. Some investments will require you to do so, so it’s just what they usually do.
Factor in whatever is appropriate and applicable. You can’t just say my mortgage is 3% so anything over that and I’m making money.
He’s too busy telling people that buying an ice coffee a couple times a week is preventing them from owning a homeWhere would Dave Ramsey be?
Don’t they all… don’t they all.So my wife has built a lot of character for me?
This is absolutely true and from a strictly financial sense is the negative of pensions and social security (the inverse is true for whole life insurance where the shorter your life the better it looks financially).Sure it's semantics, but there is no guarantee that both us will live another 20 years to draw out any set amount. I look at finances not as a whole, but what we can collect each month, without having to bring down the principal on our investments. It's impossible to put out an accurate figure of the net worth of SS or a pension like IPERS, because you cannot factor in how long you are both going to live.
On those statements you make home equity 0. So either delete it from both sides or put the house value equal the level of the mortgage.I mean, if you have a mortgage on it, the only way to convey the equity against the loan is to include it on the asset side. And I'm sure you wouldn't ignore the cost of a mortgage on any financial statement, so I'm not sure who these "most financial people" are, unless they are saying that for people who own their home free and clear, in which case I think it's only dumb to not include the value of paid off real estate on your worth statement.
If they are suggesting not to include it at current market value, I totally agree. I value my own at what I paid for it plus improvements minus 5% depreciation annually to make sure it isn't overvlued, but I can't imagine just leaving it off.
Don’t forget those $125,000 starter homes 10 years ago are nearly double that now. The housing market is ****** up. I’m only 26 but I don’t expect to own a home anytime soonThose interest rates are gonna keep younger millennials and Gen Z from ever buying a home because no one is going to want to move into other homes so no supply for starter homes.
I didn’t say not to do it. I was saying to get a correct number you need to calculate in more than just what the investment has for a gross return to what your interest rate is. I’m saying you are going backwards to have a 3% mortgage while investing in a 3.3% money market.My mortgage is 3%.
This is what QQQ returned over the last decade.
Key Performance Metrics (Last 10 Years)
Data reflected through February 2026:
MetricReturn Value
Annualized Total Return~20.4%
Cumulative Return~485%
Growth of $10,000~$58,500 – $60,000
I'll take my chances all day every day with keeping 2.9% for the possibility of these returns
Gift funds, consolidating cards, and clanging DU approval at 49%. Welcome to home ownership, young buck.The big barrier to homeownership for this generation is not the interest rates. The sub-3% $hit was saw during COVID is a statistical anomaly and what we're seeing now is much more "normal". It's not even the downpayment requirements because you only need 3% down.
The absolute biggest problem -and it's not even close - is the price point. Home prices have grown at multiple times greater rate than what real wages have. It's just that simple.
These are from 2 years ago and it's only gotten worse.
Our modest house that we bought back in '99 has been paid for over 10 years now. It's now worth 3.5 times what we paid for it. I always thought we would retire to a different location, but at the current pace, we're far better off staying put and traveling or snow-birding when weather gets less desirable.The big barrier to homeownership for this generation is not the interest rates. The sub-3% $hit was saw during COVID is a statistical anomaly and what we're seeing now is much more "normal". It's not even the downpayment requirements because you only need 3% down.
The absolute biggest problem -and it's not even close - is the price point. Home prices have grown at multiple times greater rate than what real wages have. It's just that simple.
This is from 2 years ago and it's only gotten worse.
The big barrier to homeownership for this generation is not the interest rates. The sub-3% $hit was saw during COVID is a statistical anomaly and what we're seeing now is much more "normal". It's not even the downpayment requirements because you only need 3% down.
The absolute biggest problem -and it's not even close - is the price point. Home prices have grown at multiple times greater rate than what real wages have. It's just that simple.
These are from 2 years ago and it's only gotten worse.
My son was ~28 when he bought a $275k home about 5 years ago. He saved up $50k for down payment over about 5 years, mostly by sacrificing on cars. Wife has used pickup and he has driven a parade of absolutely disposable garbage vehicles. They also rented/shared home with her dad for a year or two.Don’t forget those $125,000 starter homes 10 years ago are nearly double that now. The housing market is ****** up. I’m only 26 but I don’t expect to own a home anytime soon
It's a myth because most Americans are not anywhere near that number in reality. A quick A1 search shows that currently people 45 to 54 have $115K, 55 to 64 $185 K, 65 to 74 #200K and over 75 $130K stocked away for retirement. So the vast majority of Americans have no where near 2 to 2.5 million even if assists like your home would be included unless you are living in high priced cities like NY, SF and LA.This is absolutely true and from a strictly financial sense is the negative of pensions and social security (the inverse is true for whole life insurance where the shorter your life the better it looks financially).
But I have been responding to this statement:
"The current idea that you need $2 to $2.5 million to retire is a myth that most Americans are not going to come close to reaching."
And my larger point is if that advice is for someone that has access to a personal retirement account and not a pension (which is the case for many, many people in the workforce currently) then that advice holds true and your situation is almost the definition of it. If you and your spouse had worked somewhere with a company match to your retirement contributions instead of pension contributions then your retirement investment assets would be in that range and you would have retirement income similar to what yours is now. To say it is a myth, at least in your situation, is only true if you assign little to no value to your pension which frankly doesn't make much sense if you're taking about investments and income needed for retirement.