Is the only reason “it looks horrible” is because folks think it should be larger? Ninety-nine percent of football stadiums don’t have the majority of their suites on the concourse level like ISU does. Those stadiums need skyboxes that stretch end zone to end zone. When ISU has the increased demand, I expect that concourse suites on the east side will be added and we’ll still have the current sky tower.
Where are you putting the displaced club seats? The discussion earlier this year concluded that we have wait lists for club seating and may have them for suits.
Everyone at this point gets the whole there are premium seats between the two levels that other stadiums don’t have. that doesn’t change the fact that the current tower looks horribly out of proportion and ugly.
Nothing is getting done for the next few years with the uncertainty but it still needs done eventually. I had been on board for doing something to finish the NEZ first and shift cheaper seats from the sides to the end but it’s actually turned out pretty nice and the talk was that they could do a third deck.
At the end of the day we need to be in a stable and financially sound conference.