Jamie Pollard...

No one his is questioning Jamie Pollard's ability to manage the funding that ISU is receiving (except the wrestling fans but....I mean come on it's wrestling). The biggest problem I and anyone else has is that he treats his job as a means to make buddies with the coaches instead of treating them like what they are, employees. Fact of the matter is he has done a terrible job of hiring/managing coaches, and instead of getting out of his own way, Leath has had to step in and do it for him (thank God). Personally I think he would make an incredible associate AD, doing the administrative work while someone else actually does their job and manages the people below him/her.

And to anyone that wants to point to him hiring Hoiberg....you are out of your mind. Any AD at ISU could have gotten Fred here. At the time he WANTED to be coaching here, something that basically NEVER happens. Fred came to ISU because of Fred, not because of Jamie. The reality is if Fred wants something badly enough, he finds a way. Maybe it would have taken him longer to build a resume deserving of the job had another AD been here, but he still would have been an ISU coach until the NBA came calling.

Who are his buddies that are coaches?
 
Who are his buddies that are coaches?

Are you asking from his frame of reference or from the coaches :smile:? I image from the coaches perspective he doesn't have any buddies. From the perspective of him going on national television and blubbering like a child with a temper tantrum because we lost a football game (making ISU from the top down the laughing stock of the Big 12), the fact no one (especially the team) likes Smoke on the Water yet it still gets played, and our stale marketing of the football team....I would say Jamie likes to think he and Rhoads are best buds.
 
Fair enough.



Which 99% of the basketball world would've done at the time. Many liked the McDermott hire and he was successful at UNI.



Wow, complete nonsense. Getting lucky McDermott failed? I'm sure JP would've been thrilled if McDermott turned it around and didn't have the constant exodus of players and won games.

As for hiring Hoiberg due to being cheap? That's quite an accusation. Do you have a link for that? He hired Hoiberg due to being in contact with him over the years, Hoiberg stating what he'd do to turn around ISU bball and expressing he wanted the job, and to bring ISU's golden boy back home to a frustrated and disinterested fanbase.



Then add in the reports where Fred refuted everything and anyone who actually looked into the accusations about the ballroom incident and staff family travel and Hines giving Pollard one day to refute an already-written article should be more intelligent to not fall for tabloid journalism.



At my company, candidates are usually selected by the hiring manager, then interviewed with them, potential peers, and possibly the department manager. In sports, the GM may select the interviewees, however still need to run them by the owner for interview/approval.

So, I hope Leath is involved with all major hires at ISU. I agree it was good that Leath was involved. However do you have a source/link for stating Leath did the searching as well? I believe the Leath involvement was more similar to what I wrote in my preceding paragraph--Leath wanted due diligence on the candidate selections and be a part of the interviewing process. I hope all ISU presidents have that level of involvement with all ADs for major hires.



At least you started and ended your post well--too bad the middle was garbage.
I'm in no way saying he wanted McDoormat to fail. What I am trying to portray is that because McDoormat failed so miserably, JP had pretty much no choice left but to hire Hoiberg because nobody else likely wanted the job. While many think the hire of GM was great at the time, that doesn't excuse the hire. That's the same kind of thinking that if you work for an investment company and you put your money into a stock that seems to be the "right move" and fails that it's excusable and will get you a free pass. Hindsight is always 20/20, but that doesn't excuse failing. As for the JP being cheap remark, he hired Hoiberg for $1mil. That's less than McDoormat was making at ISU so that's why I'm making that being cheap comment.
 
I'm in no way saying he wanted McDoormat to fail. What I am trying to portray is that because McDoormat failed so miserably, JP had pretty much no choice left but to hire Hoiberg because nobody else likely wanted the job.

You're making things up again. McDermott resigned and JP hired Hoiberg before really bringing in other candidates to interview for the position. The vacancy wasn't vacant long enough for people to apply. JP critics would be correct doing this back-door deal without posting the position and see the quality of candidates available, but you went the other route, which is laughable.

While many think the hire of GM was great at the time, that doesn't excuse the hire. That's the same kind of thinking that if you work for an investment company and you put your money into a stock that seems to be the "right move" and fails that it's excusable and will get you a free pass. Hindsight is always 20/20, but that doesn't excuse failing.

JP isn't getting a free pass. Your point was that he hired McDermott over Hoiberg, which almost everyone would have done at that time.

As for the JP being cheap remark, he hired Hoiberg for $1mil. That's less than McDoormat was making at ISU so that's why I'm making that being cheap comment.

Logic fail again. How much coaching experience did Hoiberg have when hired? How much did McDermott have?

Listen, you don't like JP, that's fine. There are issues with him and if you brought those up, like focusing on why Rhoads is still here, that is fine. But you discredit your points when filled with citing the BS you've done in two posts.
 
The people who are calling for the firing of JP need to calm the F down. Yes, he needs to wake up and get rid of CPR but other than that he has been one of the best things to happen to ISU athletics. I would hate to see him leave.
 
So with the SEZ, I don't see that as anything Pollard really did. A huge, and I mean huge donation made that happen. Same way with the basketball facility, huge donation made that happen as well.

Dumbest post ever ( or close )

I hope you aren't in business
 
Dumbest post ever ( or close )

I hope you aren't in business

It's hilarious how people will tell the story to fit their narrative. Anything good that has happened while Pollard has been AD is luck, or circumstance. Anything bad that has happened is squarely on him and bad decision making. Ha.
 
The biggest decision an AD makes is who is the head football coach. JP cannot be trusted to hire the next coach. That is why I think he should be gone.
 
I get the feeling that most think JP will fire CPR at the end of the year. I'm not so sure. Do we need a poll on what he'll do?
 
The people who are calling for the firing of JP need to calm the F down. Yes, he needs to wake up and get rid of CPR but other than that he has been one of the best things to happen to ISU athletics. I would hate to see him leave.

Look, I don't care if Jamie stays or goes. All cyclone fans want out of him right now is to get rid of CPR and hire a good football coach.
 
Pollard has solid credentials in being an AD and businessman. Just look at the facilities and the money he has brought to Iowa State. He has experience in being the President of the entire 1A Athletics Directors Association (Immediate Past President now). His main issue for me is not hiring the right football coach.

The other issue is ISU does not pay coaches incredibly well compared to the rest of the B12.

Football coach salaries, benefits, bonuses paid by university*
1. Mack Brown (resigned Dec.)/Charlie Strong - football - $7,723,067
2. Bob Stoops, Oklahoma: $5,533,882
3. Gary Patterson, Texas Christian: $4,008,150
4. Mike Gundy, Oklahoma State: $3,196,606
5. Dana Holgorsen, West Virginia: $3,180,788
6. Art Briles, Baylor: $3,135,146
7. Bill Snyder, Kansas State: $2,987,038
8. Charlie Weis, Kansas (since fired): $2,566,662
9. Kliff Klingsbury, Texas Tech: $2,270,928
10. Paul Rhoads, Iowa State: $1,837,627

Football recruiting spending*
1. Oklahoma: $880,541
2. Texas Tech: $751,027
3. Iowa State: $644,213
4. Texas: $594,124
5. Kansas: $577,432
6. West Virginia: $448,540
7. Kansas State: $445,603
8. Oklahoma State: $203,622

So the players should be there with all that money spent recruiting, just the coach isn’t at the same level of competency.

Get what you pay for? *2013-14 Data
 
Last edited:
No way. There is no return on investment in wrestling. I know we have history, and a core group of fans, but it makes no sense. The sport is dying, and even being elite year after year won't bring the attention or revenue to the school to justify the cost.

Point taken, I know we would not see the return in revenue. I do think winning a national title in wrestling(or any sport for that matter) would bring a lot of positive attention to the university, but it's difficult to put a monetary value on that.

It wouldn't have taken that much to keep Cael here. He didn't ask for a raise in pay to what Penn state was offering him. He wanted to see the difference between his salary at ISU and what he was offered at PSU put towards the wrestling program. Pennies in the grand scheme of things in our athletic budget.

Devastating to me as a wrestling fan(and I realize I am in the minority there) that we had Dan Gable, let him walk. He goes on to win 15 national titles at Iowa. The second coming of Gable (Cael) comes around, and we let him walk. He's won 4 national titles at Penn state.

We just can't have nice things.
 
Last edited:
I am going to disagree 100% about it being risky. He knew the basketball program was at an all time low and he could get Fred for dirt cheap. Fred had begged for the job in 2006 (or whatever year McDoormat was hired) and JP thought it was too risky at the time. Coming back four years later to probably the only option outside of a joke of a coach made it obvious that Fred would be the guy. It was a low-risk high-reward hire in 2010 because if he failed it wouldn't be any different than the past six years.

It wasn't risky to hire the biggest legend in school history to the biggest job in the AD with absolutely no coaching experience? JP bet his job and his legacy in that hiring. If that didn't work, the AD doesn't survive firing Hoiberg. And after losing his job, he would forever be remembered as the guy who fired Fred. He certainly wouldn't be having his name circulated for the USC job today, and he wouldn't be considered a leading candidate for a future position at Wisconsin. But sure, there was no downside there beyond a few more years of bad hoops.
 
JP is the best thing that has happened to ISU. My experience is the only folks that don't like him are the older, penny pinching fans that are scorned because they lost their 50 yd line seats they used to get for next to nothing.

Really? My guess would be it's people too young to remember how bad Bruce Van De Velde was. It's tough to imagine many people who have been fans of ISU for very long, at least not seeing what JP has done here as an all out miracle.

Yeah, the TV money has been a nice boost that other ADs here didn't have, but that money just keeps the fire lit. It's not the TV money that builds the BBall practice facility and does all the upgrades to JTS that have happened. This is definitely a case of JP certainly not being perfect, but in the long run, is doing great work for ISU and keeping people excited about sports here.

With all that being said though, the end of this football season will be a big moment in his tenure here. He will have to get rid of CPR and hire someone who will bring some excitement to ISU football. If he doesn't, no matter what he has done up to this point will matter and it will be his head on the chopping block with CPR.

I am amazed though that people can't see all the good he has done for ISU.
 
Jamie Pollard is the best thing to ever happen at ISU, but to be a true legend, you are ultimately judged on your coaching hires and excluding Steve Peterson I don't an AD that has swung and missed so much on those hires and still kept his job.
 
Nailed it. Have some of hours hires underperformed? Without a doubt. Were any of them heavily criticized or unpopular at the time they were made? Maybe the McD extension. But the McD hire, the Fred hire, the Chiz hire, and the CPR hire and extension were all pretty popular at the time. And the Prohm hire seems to be well received to. How can you argue to can a guy when he seemed to be making all the right moves at the time? I don't have any faith that someone else would have produced a better outcome.

"Making a hire that seems like a good idea at the time" is something anyone can do. Pollard's job is not to make hires that appear good. Pollard's job is to make hires that are actually good. In that he has failed miserably. Among the hires he has made Christy Johnson-Lynch is the only one that has been above average other than Fred, and Fred fell into his lap. The majority of the coaches Pollard has picked have turned out to be bad coaching hires, and the more prominent the sport the worse the hire tends to be. Pollard is a good administrator and he deserves credit for that. But his single most important job is selecting coaches. And Pollard is absolutely terrible at selecting coaches.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron