***Iowa Pregame Thread***

The EIU defense took a huge step back last season, and many thought that was going to be a strength of the team because they had so many returning starters from the year before. Those players are now gone, and they will be starting all new LBers this season, half their Dline returns along with half of their DBs, which were weak last season. They have good players, but many have not seen a lot of snaps, especially at the LB position. Nwampka was totally over rated coming out of SE Polk, he played horrible most of the season last year and was bench at least once.

Iowa's secondary is a sum of the parts. If there is a weak link they are absolutely exploitable. I don't see how they handle our TE's.
 
Last edited:
Their LBers are young and not many snaps played, they are going to be good next season, but it's going to be a struggle this year. Just like it was for us last season when injuries wiped out our LB core.

Honestly, it's probably way too early to make that assumption. Across the board that back 7 just doesn't seem nearly as talented compared to the last 6 years or so.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: EnkAMania
I was stunned when Leistikow(I think) put Kurt’s retirement O/U at 4.5 years.
Get the feeling their fan base wants him to get the record and then retire, forgetting that free rents is stubborn as hell and is going to do what he wants. He has stated in the past his health is good and he still enjoys what he is doing. I expect he will fulfill the contract and maybe add a few more years.
Of course the guy has had it good for a number of years playing in the pillow soft west, with that now gone, and playing no divisions he could always change his mind. He just turned 70 in August, I could see him sticking around for awhile.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Acylum
I thought ISU did a great job stopping the run after the score was 19-7. Kaleb had a couple big runs that inflated his stats, but Iowa couldn't sustain a drive at all the final 1.5 quarters. Here were Iowa drives after the score was 19-7 with 4:47 left in the 3rd quarter

3 plays, 3 yards
3 plays, -2 yards
3 plays, 0 yards
7 plays, 14 yards (2 first downs)
6 plays, 8 yards (1 first down)

Summary
5 drives for 3 first downs and 23 yards.

Two things will happen on Saturday. As long as these are just one offs we will be just fine, we just can't let these lead to multiple TD's.

1.) Iowa will hit on ac couple big runs, they always do.
2.) we will get burnt on a play action pass for a big play
 
Honestly, it's probably way too early to make that assumption. Across the board that back 7 just doesn't seem nearly as talented compared to the last 6 years or so.
They have always had good linebackers, I really do not see that changing. What hurt the backups is that a couple of guys from last year took a covid year and returned, so they just did not get a lot of playing time, like they would have.
If you look at the way they always play defense they work together very well as a group, the D line pressure the QB, and keeps the O lineman contained, allowing their LB to flow up to the ball to make the tackle. Their DBs worry about getting beat deep so they are playing back. Their whole concept is that we are not going to let you drive the ball down the field and score a TD. They struggled getting off the field last year, and will do much the same this season, they thought the offense would be able to step up, which so far it has not. I wonder if a lot of their belief in the new OC last year was less about him and more had to do with Johnson just being a complete stud and making up for a lot of their weaknesses, much like Hall made our OL look a lot better than what it was.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Letterkenny
DpbSCFmW0AANE3r.jpg:large
In Tombstone voice.......... "Say when"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Letterkenny
Didn't show...what? What is there to show?

That offense hasn't changed in 30 years.

The only way it's brilliant is if Gronowski sucked on purpose missing on those throws intentionally and is actually incredibly accurate.

The offensive line and running backs obviously were trying to do their best and score, so if he was engaging in 4D chess he was the only person on the offense doing so.

I guess it's possible but incredibly unlikely.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kinch
In the 12 team CFP format, the game is significantly more important for Iowa than Iowa State (it's still important for ISU). With no divisions, Iowa is NOT winning the Big 10 anymore so their ONLY path to the CFP is an at-large and those at-large hopes are almost completely demolished with a loss to Iowa State. While a loss to Iowa kills ISU's already small at-large chances, it literaly does not impact their conference title odds one bit.
This makes sense. Unless chaos the Big12 is only getting the champion in
 
Granowski has been known to fumble snaps.


Is there something wrong with his throwing hand? Lots of ducks at both kids day and last week. Seems reminiscent of the hand injury Matt Sherman had 30 years ago.

H
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kinch
My gut tells me to hammer ISU -3 or buy it down to -2.5 cuz we’re the more complete team. My head tells me to hammer Iowa ML as an emotional hedge
 
  • Like
Reactions: CascadeClone
Is there something wrong with his throwing hand? Lots of ducks at both kids day and last week. Seems reminiscent of the hand injury Matt Sherman had 30 years ago.

H
He is coming off shoulder surgery on his throwing arm. That’s what I’m concerned about the most.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Letterkenny

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron