Tyrese Hunter is the #36 composite ranked player in the class. He should start and probably have the most minutes per game from Day 1.
Feels like this is a no brainer. Who else would even be in the conversation to get more minutes? Foster?Tyrese Hunter is the #36 composite ranked player in the class. He should start and probably have the most minutes per game from Day 1.
Feels like this is a no brainer. Who else would even be in the conversation to get more minutes? Foster?
I can’t let that go without calling you stupid.LOL, where are they now. There is no doubt that Haliburton was the best player on the team.
If that happens, I would expect you to be right along side me questioning TJ as the coach.The MN transfer guy.
If that happens, I would expect you to be right along side me questioning TJ as the coach.
God damn it Gunner.I would understand that. He’s going to be our most experienced and proven player (as it stands now).
You’ve been around long enough I’ll take that as a compliment.I can’t let that go without calling you stupid.
This kid started for three years on a Big 10 team. He’ll get the most minutes.If that happens, I would expect you to be right along side me questioning TJ as the coach.
God damn it Gunner.
I would say Kalscheur or Hinson for most mpgThis kid started for three years on a Big 10 team. He’ll get the most minutes.
I don’t know, you’re the one that said you shouldn’t bench THT because he was one of ISU’s highest recruits ever.
Can you see how the bolded below could be construed to be not what you’re saying above?I think you've been around the block long enough to know that wasn't my argument.
"Wigginton was so highly ranked so he should start!" is what is being refuted.
This is technically true. Wigginton had an impressive pedigree. But so did Horton-Tucker. And Horton-Tucker has gone on to do more and was much more desired by the NBA than Wigginton. Recruiting rankings are nice but, once a young man is on campus, I would say their productivity matters more.
Ergo, starting Horton-Tucker over Wigginton was not an unreasonable decision. When it came to actual on-court production and efficiency, the two of them were pretty similar to each other. It is certainly not one of the profound errors that led to the downfall of the Prohm regime the past two years.
I would worry about stuff that actually devastated the program under Prohm's watch, like, for instance, passing on McKinley Wright IV (a future All-American) for Darius McNeill, not hiring Kyle Green (and A.J. with him) when he had the chance a few years ago, and the string of 4* recruits who busted (e.g., Lewis).
Starting Wigginton means benching either...
-- two fifth-year seniors, one of which played in the NBA and won first-team all-Big 12, and the other one has had a successful overseas career and was the only experienced PG on the roster
-- the 12th overall pick and a contender for NBA ROTY as a 20-year old
-- replacing the #4 recruit in school history, one drafted and who won an NBA ring... unlike Wigginton
This "Wigginton should have started!" meme is so old. He wasn't clearly better than any of those four.
Can you see how the bolded below could be construed to be not what you’re saying above?
Unless Prohm had some ability to read the future, I don’t know if the fact that THT won a ring with the Lakers really would have played a part in the decision of who starts.No. I can't see why you'd misread it like that.
The point was Horton-Tucker wasn't some slouch -- using the evidence of the same recruiting rankings that the Wigginton martyrdom crowd use as evidence of his martyrdom.
That plus the, oh, you know, the ring, when Wigginton hasn't logged a minute in the NBA.
It isn't that difficult.
I think you're bright enough to know nobody would seriously argue the way a coach should set a lineup is taking his five-highest rated recruits and trotting them out there. And that is, that only, with no regard to their actual productivity, effort on the court, experience, or filling out necessary roles.
Unless Prohm had some ability to read the future, I don’t know if the fact that THT won a ring with the Lakers really would have played a part in the decision of who starts.
Oh Sig, never stop being you.I don't see why we can't use some hindsight to determine that, yes, Prohm picked the more talented of the two of them to start (imperfect and increasingly antiquated recruiting rankings notwithstanding after a player has been on campus), and their subsequent careers are bearing that judgement out well.
Oh Sig, never stop being you.