Just finished listening to Blum and CW. They spend about 5 minutes talking about my exact same point. Go back to beginning of this thread. People were awful. That doesn't mean every single one. So I guess I'm just as much of an ass as the two people who bring us this great content.
Honestly I found this segment of their pod pretty off-putting.
I mean, from the start it misrepresented 99% of the complaints about this as if they were attacking
her and not the role she was in. Then we got told "they're doing this for the fans to make it less boring", but then got told "well we have to do this for the money".
If you want to say that the ad read time is necessary, I get that. But don't try to spin it as something positive for fans when most fans find this kind of in-game host to be a negative that takes away from the other things that make cfb great. And
certainly don't try to deflect criticism of the AD's decision to have this role by berating an audience as if they're personally going after her. No doubt there are some idiots who are making sexist remarks and ****, but that's not the vast majority who were complaining about this Saturday.
And yes, ISU may feel it has to do these things for the ad time, but that comes at a cost, and if that cost is decreasing the in-game experience there are other potential costs ISU may pay for that down the road.