Far too little controversy here ...

Genuine question, did Snyder really "leave" the cabinet bare? Pretty sure Brown had far less to work with than Klieman had in year one. Both exceeded expectations but I'd tier it like this.

Under par:
Rhule
Riley

Par:
Brown
Campbell
Gundy
Klieman
Miles

Above par:
Patterson
Wells

Drunk at the clubhouse:
Herman

Could be convinced to flip Riley and Gundy really.
 
Did you bother reading the criteria, dummy? Or are you just blowing gas to flavor the room?
You said only "based on what they accomplished this year". You didnt provide any sort of listed criteria as to which criteria would be considered and the weighted scale as for which accomplishments were "better" than which.

Or were you just "blowing gas to flavor the room"?
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: DurangoCy and GTO
Genuine question, did Snyder really "leave" the cabinet bare? Pretty sure Brown had far less to work with than Klieman had in year one. Both exceeded expectations but I'd tier it like this.

Under par:
Rhule
Riley

Par:
Brown
Campbell
Gundy
Klieman
Miles

Above par:
Patterson
Wells

Drunk at the clubhouse:
Herman

Could be convinced to flip Riley and Gundy really.
I vote to move Klieman to Above Par or Drunk at the Clubhouse just because surly started this.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: besserheimerphat
Kstate coach should replace tom tom hernan next year if he is so great
 
"Based solely on what they accomplished this year"- wouldn't that just be the final conference standings?
 
  • Winner
Reactions: CloneFan4
Did you bother reading the criteria, dummy? Or are you just blowing gas to flavor the room?
Hey dummy, if you are going to go almost solely off how they performed compared to preseason expectations then why don't you include that in your criteria. If you are just going off of performance this year your rankings make no f*ck!ng sense.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron