Looking around Iowa fan sites tonight has me really appreciating CF and (almost) all of you who post here. This site is practically a full social media site compared to those dullards' sites.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah a buddy texted me that it was the fewest number of Iowa fans he's seen in the stadium. Ever.I thought it was 90% to 10% in the stadium.
My lucky underwear is 3-0 this year!I changed my shirt before cyclones fg drive. It worked for offense and defense. Im so glad I made a rough decision in a crucial time! 3-0 baby!!!
There were a lot and several in my section.Yeah a buddy texted me that it was the fewest number of Iowa fans he's seen in the stadium. Ever.
I had the exact discussion today. Was the least amount and quietest I’ve ever seen from Hawk fans.Yeah a buddy texted me that it was the fewest number of Iowa fans he's seen in the stadium. Ever.
This has been bothering me. Early 3rd quarter we punt and tackle Iowa on the 5. A flag for holding on Iowa and should be half the distance to the goal. They still start the drive on the 5 and no the 2.5. Was that just straight wrong by the refs? How did nobody catch that?
Less than 5k iowa fans. And they only know 2 words.I thought it was 90% to 10% in the stadium.
This has been bothering me. Early 3rd quarter we punt and tackle Iowa on the 5. A flag for holding on Iowa and should be half the distance to the goal. They still start the drive on the 5 and not the 2.5. Was that just straight wrong by the refs? How did nobody catch that?
There is a pretty good explanation why we declined the penalty some pages back in this thread. Something about if the penalty would have been enforced, it would have been half the distance from the 12 which meant it was a better spot for us and so we declined the penalty.This has been bothering me. Early 3rd quarter we punt and tackle Iowa on the 5. A flag for holding on Iowa and should be half the distance to the goal. They still start the drive on the 5 and no the 2.5. Was that just straight wrong by the refs? How did nobody catch that?
Yep, the penalty would have been enforced from the end of the kick, not the end of the return. Since Wetjen ran backwards before he was tackled, declining the penalty was better than accepting it.There is a pretty good explanation why we declined the penalty some pages back in this thread. Something about if the penalty would have been enforced, it would have been half the distance from the 12 which meant it was a better spot for us and so we declined the penalty.
I havent changed mine since Ireland.My lucky underwear is 3-0 this year!

Don’t you dare wash them. Stand them up in the corner until next weekMy lucky underwear is 3-0 this year!
Don’t you dare wash them. Stand them up in the corner until next week
Same thought. Abu in space is great, but Hanson much more of a grinder (but can also get loose).Im not one to questions coaches but why did we go away from Hansen in Q2 and Q3 for Sama.
Hansen is our back. Feed him.
This. Was it great, no. But its a W.To play like ass (in many respects), get boned repeatedly by the refs and still win a rivalry game is a damn good feeling.