Cyclone State

  • Fanatics -

    Thank you for your patience today and welcome to the newest version of Cyclone Fanatic!

    Most of the changes we have made are very simple, but will greatly improve your user experience while visiting the website.

    We have upgraded our forum software to speed things up. Our homepage is much cleaner and should be even more mobile friendly than before.

    We appreciate your loyalty and are committed to not only keeping Cyclone Fanatic in tip-top shape, but continuing to build this community for the next decade and beyond.

    We ask that if you are experiences any glitches to let us know in this thread . Will will be diligently working on the site all day.

    Thanks again.

    Chris Williams - Publisher

clonedude

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2006
19,901
12,262
113
Sorry, there's just WAY too much wrong with that map to take it seriously.

Bucks more popular than the Packers in Wisconsin?

Astros more popular than the Cowboys?

Ohio State most popular in Michigan?

White Sox in Illinois? I'd say the Cubs, Bulls, and Bears are all more popular.

Supersonics more popular than Seahawks when the Supersonics haven't even been a team forever.
 

Cyched

Minister of Culture
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 8, 2009
15,677
22,417
113
Ankeny
Sorry, there's just WAY too much wrong with that map to take it seriously.

Bucks more popular than the Packers in Wisconsin?

Astros more popular than the Cowboys?

Ohio State most popular in Michigan?

White Sox in Illinois? I'd say the Cubs, Bulls, and Bears are all more popular.

Supersonics more popular than Seahawks when the Supersonics haven't even been a team forever.
And I highly doubt the Chargers are more popular than the Raiders and Lakers in Cali

But, I support anything that chafes the butts of our friends neighbors out east
 

TitanClone

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2008
1,061
74
48
515 via 712
Sorry, there's just WAY too much wrong with that map to take it seriously.

Bucks more popular than the Packers in Wisconsin?

Astros more popular than the Cowboys?

Ohio State most popular in Michigan?

White Sox in Illinois? I'd say the Cubs, Bulls, and Bears are all more popular.

Supersonics more popular than Seahawks when the Supersonics haven't even been a team forever.
I would have to imagine SDSU and NDSU are more popular than USD and UND in the Dakota's as well.
 

clonedude

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2006
19,901
12,262
113
So Ohio State is the most popular team in Michigan, but not in Ohio? In Ohio it's the Browns? Really?
 

CyCrazy

Well-Known Member
Dec 17, 2008
20,880
6,563
113
Ames
Sorry, there's just WAY too much wrong with that map to take it seriously.

Bucks more popular than the Packers in Wisconsin?

Astros more popular than the Cowboys?

Ohio State most popular in Michigan?

White Sox in Illinois? I'd say the Cubs, Bulls, and Bears are all more popular.

Supersonics more popular than Seahawks when the Supersonics haven't even been a team forever.
I wouldn't take this too serious. Anyone can make these.
 

casey1973

Well-Known Member
Apr 20, 2012
1,967
967
113
Ames
Sorry, there's just WAY too much wrong with that map to take it seriously.

Bucks more popular than the Packers in Wisconsin?

Astros more popular than the Cowboys?

Ohio State most popular in Michigan?

White Sox in Illinois? I'd say the Cubs, Bulls, and Bears are all more popular.

Supersonics more popular than Seahawks when the Supersonics haven't even been a team forever.

Maybe, but I love seeing the state of Iowa in Cardinal and Gold!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlaCyclone

Gonzo

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2009
13,715
9,954
113
Behind you
Sorry, there's just WAY too much wrong with that map to take it seriously.

Bucks more popular than the Packers in Wisconsin?

Astros more popular than the Cowboys?

Ohio State most popular in Michigan?

White Sox in Illinois? I'd say the Cubs, Bulls, and Bears are all more popular.

Supersonics more popular than Seahawks when the Supersonics haven't even been a team forever.
When I lived in Chicago it became very clear, very fast that White Sox fans were way more diehard about their team than Cubs fans were. Living on the north side of the city you were around a lot of transplanted young professionals. Sure they'd wear Cubs gear and say they were a fan, but they were a fan of Wrigley Field as much if not more than the team itself. Way more diehard Cubbie fans living outside of Illinois than White Sox though.
 

Chizit

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2008
4,599
634
113
Section L, Row 11
Sorry, there's just WAY too much wrong with that map to take it seriously.

Bucks more popular than the Packers in Wisconsin?

Astros more popular than the Cowboys?

Ohio State most popular in Michigan?

White Sox in Illinois? I'd say the Cubs, Bulls, and Bears are all more popular.

Supersonics more popular than Seahawks when the Supersonics haven't even been a team forever.
Sad to see another science denier
 

ImJustKCClone

Ancient Argumentative Ape
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 18, 2013
46,455
26,875
113
traipsing thru the treetops
Sorry, there's just WAY too much wrong with that map to take it seriously.

Bucks more popular than the Packers in Wisconsin?

Astros more popular than the Cowboys?

Ohio State most popular in Michigan?

White Sox in Illinois? I'd say the Cubs, Bulls, and Bears are all more popular.

Supersonics more popular than Seahawks when the Supersonics haven't even been a team forever.
Picky, picky. I didn't look at anything but Iowa. :D
 

CycloneVet917

New Member
Jul 9, 2020
15
4
3
46
I think the map was meant as a joke or just to bother certain fanbases. That said for Iowa this could be accurate.