Cincinnati sues QB for transferring to Texas Tech

Sounds like they had him signed until 12/15/2026. So he did a basic two year deal with them.



More than Likely. However, the counter to this is they are allowing him to transfer, they are just saying you broke an NIL deal that you signed. If the kid signs a contract and does not live up to it. It should take the transfer part out of it. I mean they did allow him to transfer, they are just not allowing him to break an NIL deal.
They appear to be suing for $1 million of Texas Tech's money with the QB being the middle man. Imagine how much Penn State would have paid us if we had similar contracts in place.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: tzjung and Drew0311
Yes, this is my point. Lets actually have enforceable standardized employement contracts free of ambiguity of "student athlete" and NCAA and lawsuits. Finally call a spade a spade.
NCAA has outright neglected this from the jump. Everyone is waiting for Congress to step in a regulate. Until then it's every man for himself. I don't think this will be a PR nightmare. Sorsby (or his agent) agreed to the deal with Cincy. Bro's trying to double dip with that new $4mil from Tech.
 
He signed the contract. No one forced him. Its not some kind of after the fact penalty or violation of his rights.

The lawyers are just there to get 1/3rd of any settlement savings.
Perhaps the lawyers work for the school?
 
Yeah these college kids are going to start learning about contracts and how you can be sued for not living up to them. I think every college has this right if the kids sign the contract.

I wonder if this will be the start of a push for a players union in college football.
 
That was quite the slimy grenade lobbed at future Cincinati recruits:

"University of Cincinnati, through its revenue-share structure, paid him $875,800 for a season he fully completed and in that time, he generated millions in value for the program," Ron Slavin of Lift Management said. "Attempting to recover those funds now sends the wrong message to current and future student-athletes and risks damaging the long-term credibility of Cincinnati football."

No dog in the fight, but I'm pulling for Cincy on this one
Isn't this also admitting that he did economic damage to Cincinnati by leaving?
 
I would be curious to see how the conversations between UC and its attorneys looked. Did the kid breach the contract? Probably. Will UC be able to recover the exit fee or a substantial portion thereof? Probably. Is the recovery amount worth the publicity this will garner and potential harm it could do to their athletic department? Probably not, but time will tell.
I think the "harm to the athletic department" worries are over. A dude getting an order-of-magnitude multiple of a middle class working salary isn't going to garner much sympathy for breaking a contract. And he shouldn't.
 
Last edited:
So Tech is paying their QB approx $5 million for one season. Assuming he plays around 70 snaps per game and assuming Tech plays 14 games next season, he will be paid $5,102 each time his hands touch the ball.

This is why I'm becoming less and less a college football fan and more and more an NFL fan.
 
I would be curious to see how the conversations between UC and its attorneys looked. Did the kid breach the contract? Probably. Will UC be able to recover the exit fee or a substantial portion thereof? Probably. Is the recovery amount worth the publicity this will garner and potential harm it could do to their athletic department? Probably not, but time will tell.
A million dollars to apply to NIL on other players could certainly help. Money talks.

I don't think there will be that much harm except for the top players who are all about $. Probably can't afford many of them anyway.
 
Isn't this also admitting that he did economic damage to Cincinnati by leaving?
I like his. Let's add punitive damages to the breach of contract and start the circus.

Hell, put some Cincy fans on the stand in neckbraces and have them testify to emotional whiplash.

The off-season is coming up. I need something to watch for a few months.
 
"student athlete" "breach of contract"

Looking forward to the day we just have employees and this is all over.
I think the schools will try their hardest to keep them from being employees. That opens up a whole New (and probably larger) can of worms.

I also think that they will keep them as students even if they make them some kind of employee. I think one of the major appeals of college sports for a lot of people is that you have students representing their school, classmates, and alumni against other schools. If you get rid of that, you’re just a worse version of the NFL.

I don’t know how many people would stop watching, but I don’t think they want to test that.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: 1SEIACLONE

Apparently they had a $1 million exit fee in his deal and he didn't pay it. Perhaps we should do something similar. Texas Tech reportedly paying him $4 to $6 million. Somebody in Northwest Iowa needs to strike oil.
It's a balancing act. Putting in strong buyout language is certainly something Iowa State can try, but competing schools with deeper pockets may have a larger appetite for loss than we do. If a guy is picking between Iowa State and Texas Tech, and their NIL contract doesn't contain a large buyout, while ours does, we could be shooting ourselves in the foot.
 
I wonder if this will be the start of a push for a players union in college football.


If they unionize that would be a mess. That might be the final straw for a lot of fans. Can you imagine starting a season and the players go on strike? That would just basically end it right there. Might as well just watch the pro game
 
If they unionize that would be a mess. That might be the final straw for a lot of fans. Can you imagine starting a season and the players go on strike? That would just basically end it right there. Might as well just watch the pro game
How would it be a mess compared to where we are now? They need a players union to actually negotiate some rules that will be enforceable. To me that is the only way out of this
 
If they unionize that would be a mess. That might be the final straw for a lot of fans. Can you imagine starting a season and the players go on strike? That would just basically end it right there. Might as well just watch the pro game
Also, there are some states where they wouldn’t be able to form a union (because public sector employees can’t have unions). The legislatures would probably change that because nothing can get in the way of college football, but it would still be a mess
 
  • Like
Reactions: Drew0311
So Tech is paying their QB approx $5 million for one season. Assuming he plays around 70 snaps per game and assuming Tech plays 14 games next season, he will be paid $5,102 each time his hands touch the ball.

This is why I'm becoming less and less a college football fan and more and more an NFL fan.

That’s fine until you do the same math with an NFL player. Mahomes gets around 50k per snap and he’s paid right in the middle per year of NFL QBs. Seems fair for a college player gets 1/10 of that.

I think the Bears backup QB gets 4 million and doesn’t take a snap. Any issues with that?

I don’t like the way college football is going mainly because it’s basically not regulated. Not that the kids are getting paid.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron