Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How was Perry Ellis a unanimous selection? Niang >>>>>>>>>>> Perry.
Trivia Question-who was the last newcomer of the year not from ISU? I think it goes back to a Missouri player.
Again, big12 Kansas favoritism at its best with the Perry Ellis unanimous selection.
How dare you use logic and common sense over fandom! People not seeing what Ellis is going to do to the Big 12 this year is based only on the jersey he wears. He had better Big 12 numbers than Niang in everything but assists and I look for Ellis to have another big spike in productivity this year. Should be the safest pick for 1st team Big 12.During 2014 Big 12 play: Ellis - 24.4 PER, 59.3 TS%, 53.4 eFG%, 13.6 TRB%, 127 ORtg, .202 WS/40 Niang - 17.3 PER, 51.4 TS%, 50.0 eFG%, 7.8 TRB%, 102.3 ORtg, 0.099 WS/40
not arguing that Ellis shouldn't have been unanimously chosen, but if you think coaches are using advanced statistics (let alone filling out the ballot themselves) you have no clue.During 2014 Big 12 play:
Ellis - 24.4 PER, 59.3 TS%, 53.4 eFG%, 13.6 TRB%, 127 ORtg, .202 WS/40
Niang - 17.3 PER, 51.4 TS%, 50.0 eFG%, 7.8 TRB%, 102.3 ORtg, 0.099 WS/40
not arguing that Ellis shouldn't have been unanimously chosen, but if you think coaches are using advanced statistics (let alone filling out the ballot themselves) you have no clue.
So is it favoritism or accidentally choosing the guy with the better stats?
All these narratives are confusing.
Neither, it is from scouting these guys over the past few years and realizing the quality of player they are. Do you honestly think coach Self would take 30 minutes out of his day to research advanced statistics and break down who he should vote for?So is it favoritism or accidentally choosing the guy with the better stats?
All these narratives are confusing.
Neither, it is from scouting these guys over the past few years and realizing the quality of player they are. Do you honestly think coach Self would take 30 minutes out of his day to research advanced statistics and break down who he should vote for?
During 2014 Big 12 play:
Ellis - 24.4 PER, 59.3 TS%, 53.4 eFG%, 13.6 TRB%, 127 ORtg, .202 WS/40
Niang - 17.3 PER, 51.4 TS%, 50.0 eFG%, 7.8 TRB%, 102.3 ORtg, 0.099 WS/40
not arguing that Ellis shouldn't have been unanimously chosen, but if you think coaches are using advanced statistics (let alone filling out the ballot themselves) you have no clue.
Of course your going to be more efficient shooter and rebounder when the majority of shots are in the paint, dunks, spot up 12 footers, and free throws.
I have to disagree with the idea that non 3-point shooters should be more efficient than players that take a significant number of 3-pointers. The three most efficient shooters in the nation last year shot a high number of 3 pointers.
Jason Calliste - 129 3-point attempts
Ethan Wragge - 234 3-point attempts
Niels Giffey - 120 3-point attempts