Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You do and we are? We're taking offense so Babb could still defend the three and Babb at pg doesn't mean we are thinner at the three imo. It means our three is handling pg duties. Did playing Georges at the pg mean we were thinner at the four? And we're only talking about Babb at the pg spot due to being thin there imo.The problem with that scenario is your take Barb out of the 3 where we are thinner.
That's not true at all. You could argue it's the opposite. One of the biggest values of a wing or "3" is as capacity resource as a 3P shooter. If you're not a great three point shooter you're value is less intrinsic and you're better at the 1 or 2]
He is not as good of an inside outside threat due to less confidence in his 3PT shot, thus making him a bit less valuable in the 1-2 slots in our offense.
Surprised people aren't higher on Morrow for a few reasons:
1. I think we will go after him hard and have a realistic shot at landing him with his Midwest ties.
2. Prohm loves that type of forward. Plus athleticism and rim protector.
3. Only a soph and has proven he can make a big impact at high D 1 level.
Kid is at the top of my wish list.
That's not true at all. You could argue it's the opposite. One of the biggest values of a wing or "3" is as capacity resource as a 3P shooter. If you're not a great three point shooter you're value is less intrinsic and you're better at the 1 or 2
That's not true at all. You could argue it's the opposite. One of the biggest values of a wing or "3" is as capacity resource as a 3P shooter. If you're not a great three point shooter you're value is less intrinsic and you're better at the 1 or 2
My guess: it's going to be pretty difficult to tell who the "PG" is on many possessions next season. DJ could bring the ball up, then give to Babb, who sets the play up, then hands off to Wigginton, who runs a pick n roll. Who's the PG in that situation?I believe I will stop with the tit for tat. We will see it all play out next year. How about a friendly wager of a soda or a beer on which of the three, Jackson, Babb or Wigginton spend more time at the point next year? I would bet that one, if not both of Wiggington and Jackson spend more time at the point than does Babb. I didn't say they would play more minutes, just likely more at the point. To keep it friendly, if it isn't clear cut, I will still pay up and toast the season. It is a good time to be a Cyclone!
Fill me up with Juiston and let Solomon sometimes ply a four.
I'm high on any kid who went to Simeon and played for Mac Irvin FireSurprised people aren't higher on Morrow for a few reasons:
1. I think we will go after him hard and have a realistic shot at landing him with his Midwest ties.
2. Prohm loves that type of forward. Plus athleticism and rim protector.
3. Only a soph and has proven he can make a big impact at high D 1 level.
Kid is at the top of my wish list.
I don't know if the numbers support it, but Jackson didn't seem like the most dependable ball handler. Serviceable, sure, but he coughed it up under pressure a few times.
wutFill me up with Juiston and let Solomon sometimes ply a four.
Are we pretty sure Kasongo is not going to contribute much next year?
I watched the USC-MTSU game. You were right.Idk why but it seems like no one is mentioning the grad transfer Nick King, who I would have at the absolute top of my list. No idea whether or not we are even involved but we're talking wish lists here.