I like Oliver's potential a lot. He's a lanky kid with long arms who can disrupt on defense. And he has guard skills. So until these rumors are official, I hear nothing, I see nothing, I...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Paige is ok...though from what I saw of him...he was alot better as a freshman...though he did have better talent around him then...wasn't very aggressive..reminds me of a smaller DG in that he doesn't make alot of mistakes..though doesn't shine when he needs to.
Woodbury is all about upside...NEEDS to get more aggressive...playing against Ames DMcD schooled him in the post...and Woodbury has a 4 inch advantage on him...not good..he also needs to bulk up a bunch...He does have some good post moves but in college he'll need to refine them more.
Havent seen Gessell or Staten play...but from what I heard...talent wise it goes
1)Staten
2)Paige
3)Woodbury
4)Gessell
yes I know Woodbury is a PF/C while the rest are guards...but 3 and 4 could switch.
Without those guards, ISU never gets there, regardless of post play.While we need guards, I like the fact we have a lot of size.
I'm thinking Stanford vs. ISU a few years back in womens baskeball. Who cared we had all those great guards? Their size trumped it.
no mention of Harrington?? he destroyed paige when they played eachother!
I will be surprised if FH does not sign a guard from a JC this year, just for the sake of having someone to give DG some rest. There has to be more guards than any other postion available. It is hard to believe that there isn't a servicable point guard available.
Is there a reason we don't seem to be going after Anthony Salter? Sounds like Iowa might get him? Or do we have our sights set higher?
Chris: We will have nine scholarship players for 2010. Since FH has been announced, two more players have left. Why are we throwing in the towel for more recruits next season when we only have nine players? Why are you recommending that we not use all of our 2011 scholly's? Has anyone been paying attention to what's happened and continues to happen here? What I am reading is that we should give up trying for players next season, and then back off our recruiting for the following season. Then, maybe 2012 would be year one. It is almost guaranteed that we'll lose 2 players every season, so why would we cut ourselves short on recruiting? I just don't get it with this basketball program. Support for FH is based on him bringing in immediate talent, not his coaching ability. If we are only concerned with the long term picture 2 years from now, why was the head coaching hire made so abruptly?
Could someone remind me who has left since Hoiberg was announced? Boozer and?Since FH has been announced, two more players have left.
It is pretty simple really. There aren't many quality 2010 guys left. That's it. Why bring in a guy who you know isn't good enough? Why bring someone in if you know they'll probably leave at the end of next season because they A) won't play, B) get kicked off the team of C) just don't belong?
Mike Taylor or Wesley Johnson ring a bell. Everyone said the same thing when we signed them and they both will be on NBA rosters next year. There are good players still out there and they have to get one signed. Salter is in our back yard and is the #3 rated Juco player in the country he is pretty good. Why wouldn't we get him in for a visit one player like that can mean 5-7 more wins in a season. Guard play is a must for recruiting.