Bad Calls Compilation Video

One of the most amazing things I witnessed in real life was the ball placement of the UT game last year. I was kind of hoping someone could do a compilation of all the plays followed by the placements. It was astounding. To get a first down on multiple downs ISU had to gain at least 12 yards.

Yeah, I know, a LOT of work.
 
I guess it was green and white. I never noticed it until you pointed it out there. Not that I think its a big deal, not NEARLY as big a deal as the 'Blarge'. By the way....don't watch it, you'll just have your heart ripped out again. I just re-watched it a few weeks ago, and it still pains me.

[video=youtube;XqnO3lZHkXw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqnO3lZHkXw[/video]

If U look its an easy block call as Shirley left his feet BEFORE the defender established "legal guarding position" and in essence must allow the offensive player to land without impeding. Cannot remember ever in an NCAA Tournament game when a BLARGE was called and neither official backed down.
 
How about a few years ago in Iowa City, a 5'10" CB, was called for going "helmet to helmet" with a 6'5" TE who caused a fumble that woulda resulted in an Iowa State recovery with the lead! Instead the flag flew VERY late & not only was Iowa able to keep possession but also gained an extra 15 yards with a new set of downs who went on to score a TD & take the lead!
 
Sorry boys, but the int is still that "going to the ground" rule. Maybe a crap rule, but a rule all the same. Can't really fault the refs on that one.

You do not have to go to the ground to complete a catch. That has never been a rule. You can drop to your knees to complete a catch or do many other things.

Its about control. West would have never gone to the ground beyond his knees because thats what he dropped to.

You do not have to go to the ground to complete a catch!!!!@@@@
 
You do not have to go to the ground to complete a catch. That has never been a rule. You can drop to your knees to complete a catch or do many other things.

Its about control. West would have never gone to the ground beyond his knees because thats what he dropped to.

You do not have to go to the ground to complete a catch!!!!@@@@
Of course you don't have to go to the ground, but if you do go to the ground you have to maintain control throughout the entire process of going to the ground.
 
Of course you don't have to go to the ground, but if you do go to the ground you have to maintain control throughout the entire process of going to the ground.


Once your knees hit and you have control the catch is complete. You do not have to go to your stomach. Or lie down... or roll over or any other nonsense.

Its like something gets repeated so often people just cant realize its not a rule!@!@@@

An player can just drop to his knees to complete a catch. End of story. The rest is just nonsense.
 
One of the most amazing things I witnessed in real life was the ball placement of the UT game last year. I was kind of hoping someone could do a compilation of all the plays followed by the placements. It was astounding. To get a first down on multiple downs ISU had to gain at least 12 yards.

Yeah, I know, a LOT of work.

And show the fist pumping Texas Ref that was spotting the ball in between each bad spot.
 
I think Tom O'Neil, Joe Derosa, and Paul Jansen should have some face time is this video. They've earned it.
 
Once your knees hit and you have control the catch is complete. You do not have to go to your stomach. Or lie down... or roll over or any other nonsense.

Its like something gets repeated so often people just cant realize its not a rule!@!@@@

An player can just drop to his knees to complete a catch. End of story. The rest is just nonsense.
I don't have a lot of time to tell you how wrong you are so I'll just link a couple excerpts from the rule book that directly show you that you're wrong.

If a player goes to the ground in the act of catching a pass (with or without contact by an opponent) he must maintain complete and continuous control
of the ball throughout the process of contacting the ground, whether in the
field of play or in the end zone.

If the player loses control of the ball while simultaneously touching the ground with any part of his body, or if there is doubt that the acts were
simultaneous, it is not a catch.
 
I don't have a lot of time to tell you how wrong you are so I'll just link a couple excerpts from the rule book that directly show you that you're wrong.

The one problem I had with the play is: was he going down as part of the catch, or was he going down because he made the catch and then afterwards was being brought down by the defensive player? If it is the second one, then he is down by contact once the knee is down. End of play.

The rule is not that if the player has control and then is brought down by the defensive player, the player should have to go all the way down to the ground, wrestle with the defensive player for possession, and then the play is dead.
 
The one problem I had with the play is: was he going down as part of the catch, or was he going down because he made the catch and then afterwards was being brought down by the defensive player? If it is the second one, then he is down by contact once the knee is down. End of play.
The rule is not that if the player has control and then is brought down by the defensive player, the player should have to go all the way down to the ground, wrestle with the defensive player for possession, and then the play is dead.
The rules specifically say that it doesn't matter if he went to the ground on his own or because of contact though, you still have to complete the process of contacting the ground.
 
How about going way back to the traveling call against Sam Hill at the end of the Big 12 championship game. He was heavily fouled by Danning Manning, and Manning even had his hand raised to acknowledge he commited the foul, when Woody Mayfield runs all the way in from half coourt to end the game on a non existant traveling call, costing ISU a Big 12 championship.

How about the blarge call in the MSU/ISU regional final that likely cost ISU the NT. MSU went on to crush both teams in the final four, but when the blarge was called in their game with ISU, MSU was losing the game, and almost certainly would have lost. I challenge anyone to find video evidence of a blarge in any game ever, let alone a regional final in the NCAA.

The Aaron Craft charge that cost ISU the OSU/ISU game in the NCAA 2 years ago, a game that if ISU wins, I think that ISU goes on to the final 4. Game was in Ohio for crying out loud.

And the classic, which is in this video, the winning basket by KU scored in the MIDDLE of ISU shooting a 2 shot foul. Again, show me video evidence of this EVER occuring to any other team.

Please note that in the 3-point KU debacle, the apocalyptically bad call occurred with ISU down by 10, and we wound up at the end of the game losing by 3 as I recall.. So those folks who say that things like 7 points wrongfully awarded at half time of a game to give a team a 7-point lead was inconsequential in a game that winds up decided by 17 are wrong.. Yes, ISU may not have beaten OSU last Saturday.. maybe even likely would not have. But no one will ever know.. That is a point..
 
You do not have to go to the ground to complete a catch. That has never been a rule. You can drop to your knees to complete a catch or do many other things.

Its about control. West would have never gone to the ground beyond his knees because thats what he dropped to.

You do not have to go to the ground to complete a catch!!!!@@@@

Really?

http://www.dfoa.com/attachments/article/69/2013-14_Football_Rule_Book.pdf

Rule 2-4-3 para b. Page FR29

Jesus. If we're going to rant and rave to the heavens about the bad calls - let's make damn sure we're no making them ourselves.

Again - it may be a crap rule. But it's still a rule.

And I suppose it's worth noting that the phantom 3 against KU was also done the right way - by the rules. It was pure incompetence to let it occur in the first place. And I think somewhat against the intent of the rule. But still...
 
Last edited:
Really?

http://www.dfoa.com/attachments/article/69/2013-14_Football_Rule_Book.pdf

Rule 2-4-3 para b. Page FR29

Jesus. If we're going to rant and rave to the heavens about the bad calls - let's make damn sure we're no making them ourselves.

Again - it may be a crap rule. But it's still a rule.

And I suppose it's worth noting that the phantom 3 against KU was also done the right way - by the rules. It was pure incompetence to let it occur in the first place. And I think somewhat against the intent of the rule. But still...
Do you know (or does anyone else know) what rule that is or the logic behind it, because I don't understand how it makes more sense to count the basket, have us shoot a free throw, and give us the ball, than to just take the points off.
 
Don't forget the KU basketball game in Ames when Withey committed what would have been his fifth foul (reaching in) but the refs assigned to another player so he stayed in the game into overtime.
 
Has there been any game where ISU has not been penetrated by the refs at least once (other than the Nebraska game from a couple of years ago)? If we keep adding every time the refs screwed us, this video will need to have an intermission halfway through it!
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron