Between then and last year was a quarter century of suck and ridiculous media coverage.
NBA: *** 2024 NBA thread ***
- Thread starter simply1
- Start date
Between then and last year was a quarter century of suck and ridiculous media coverage.
Should clarify that not all New York sports fans are the same - Mets/Islanders fans (let's not pretend the Nets actually have fans) are not the same as Yankees/Rangers/Knicks fans. There's a certain delusion of grandeur and entitlement that comes with the latter that isn't with the former. And I'd say "success" would be a defining factor in that... but how successful have the Rangers and Knicks been? The Knicks have 2 titles in the early 1970s, and the Rangers have 1 Stanley Cup since 1940 (trust me - growing up as an Islanders fan, that was a taunt directed at the Rangers).
Even the year Jordan was out they blew it against Houston. The year they were the 8 seed and made the run with Spreewell they were fun to watch too.
When I moved to Chicago I almost switched from Cubs because I realized Sox fans had Cyclone dna.
That was kind of a shockingly flawed yet calm comfortable playoff road win. Almost shocked me more than wild game 1 win I’ve come to expect.
There is a non zero percent chance that Charles, Tyrese, and Georges are all sitting court side in Hilton next fall for a game.
They were just better than the knicks. What was the knicks biggest lead? 5 or 6?
Mathurin is an explosive player Indy hasn’t even gotten much from. Turner was good tonight but nothing in game 1.
pacers just have too many good young players for the Knicks to defend. Brunson is a good player but he's just so ball dominant and ends up as just a real high volume guy. Maybe the Knicks can steal one but they are over matched.
Haliburtons don’t grow on trees but surrounding a pass first all star pg with a ton of good but not great talent might be a great model for a gm.
Lamelo actually could be with the right guidance but he turned high volume chucker this year.
