••• 2026 Official Chicago Cubs Thread •••

I posted yesterday this is exactly why I don’t trust him. Cruising along perfect and then he crumples. I was impressed he came back and had a clean inning. Hopefully that is something he can do more of because in the past when things went bad they only got worse.
He's a Perfect 4-5 Starter when your rotation is healthy. He is going to eat innings. He Went 7 innings and gave up 3 runs and 3 hits. I will take that plus he pitched great in the playoffs last year. I don't know how you can't trust him. Of course he will have a game he gives up 5-6 runs because he throws strikes and doesn't throw 95+. I trust him way more than Boyd since the 2nd half of last year.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: CYdTracked
He's a Perfect 4-5 Starter when your rotation is healthy. He is going to eat innings. He Went 7 innings and gave up 3 runs and 3 hits. I will take that plus he pitched great in the playoffs last year. I don't know how you can't trust him. Of course he will have a game he gives up 5-6 runs because he throws strikes and doesn't throw 95+. I trust him way more than Boyd since the 2nd half of last year.
He’s grossly overpaid for a 4-5 starter.
 
He’s grossly overpaid for a 4-5 starter.
All I know is I'm really glad to have him after what has happened to the Cubs starting and bullpen pitching so far this year. Gotta have the starts, and gotta have someone who can usually go deep in the start since you have no reliable depth in starting or in the pen.
 
I know they don't just hand out fielding errors - especially for a team at home - but I was kind of surprised that the Padres finished the game with zero errors after that terrible effort at the long fly ball where he jumped for no reason and lost it off the heel of his glove and the pop up next to the mound that both fielders stood under and couldn't find. Official scorer at Petco doing all he can to keep the Padre players in their respective gold glove races.

Feel free to educate me on this.
He’s grossly overpaid for a 4-5 starter.
17 Million AVA is not that much in 2026 especially for a big market team like the Cubs. 33-26 with a 3.96 ERA and 3.2 WAR including his bad 2023. 25-16 with a 3.55 ERA and 3.6 War since 2024. I would say those are good stats. When 6 innings 3 Earned Runs are a quality start. He's been a good signing and a solid starter
 
Fun fact from Brett Taylor:

Since July 2023 (He was horrible his first couple months here, no arguments there, Jameson Taillon has a 3.51 ERA, 12th best in MLB since that date, minimum 400 IP.

42 pitchers have thrown 400 innings since that date.

He is incredibly valuable both from an innings pitched perspective and doing it at a very admirable level.

I do not understand the "overpaid" thing even in the slightest
 
17 Million AVA is not that much in 2026 especially for a big market team like the Cubs. 33-26 with a 3.96 ERA and 3.2 WAR including his bad 2023. 25-16 with a 3.55 ERA and 3.6 War since 2024. I would say those are good stats. When 6 innings 3 Earned Runs are a quality start. He's been a good signing and a solid starter
It’s pretty much universally acknowledged the the minimums for a quality start (6IP 3ER) isn’t considered quality. I heard it numerous times by multiple broadcaster. I don’t understand your logic that big markets should be willing to pay more for average starters than small markets do.
 
Should be a fun month of baseball. I love that there's a series against all the other Central teams. Should see division standings start to take shape a little bit more. Fun out of division series as well with the Dbacks, Rangers, Braves, White Sox, and Astros. If the wind is blowing out for that Astros series, hammer every over you can. Astros currently have scored the 5th most runs in MLB and have given up the 2nd most runs.
 
Coom mentioned that A LOT yesterday.
Shaw had 1 knock him down, then another behind his back before he hit his HR yesterday.

Seiya got knocked down a bunch.

Nico was hit in the helmet.

That’s just to name a few.

It seemed a little more than accidental. Maybe they were just trying to pitch inside and jamb up the hitters as a strategy against this lineup. We’ve see Brewers do this.

The Cubs didn’t seem too pissed about it.

Also, the Padres challenge ball/strike A LOT. It was a bummer that it was the Cubs out of a challenge the one time it mattered this series.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: JP4CY
It’s pretty much universally acknowledged the the minimums for a quality start (6IP 3ER) isn’t considered quality. I heard it numerous times by multiple broadcaster. I don’t understand your logic that big markets should be willing to pay more for average starters than small markets do.
6 innings and 3 Earned Runs keeps your team in the game lol Especially when its not your 1-2 Starter pitching. Glad a couple of broadcasters don't think that's not a quality start. My logic is the Cubs are not over paying him and its not a bad contract. Also the Cubs should be looking for average starters in the free market. It creates depth for organization. The Cubs would be in trouble without the signings of Taillon, Boyd and Rea who all are considered average starting pitchers. Glad the Pirates and Reds have all that young talent of starting pitchers that will leave the second that they hit the free market which the teams like the Cubs will go after.
 
Last edited:
6 innings and 3 Earned Runs keeps your team in the game lol Especially when its not your 1-2 Starter pitching. Glad a couple of broadcasters don't think that's not a quality start. My logic is the Cubs are not over paying him and its not a bad contract.
Do you think he should be resigned? Or worth a QO?
 
Sutcliffe also mentioned the up and in pitches. Said he didn't think there was any intent, but at some point he expected some retaliation if the situation presented itself. Obviously didn't happen last night but I imagine they tuck that away for when the come back to Chicago in June.
 
Do you think he should be resigned? Or worth a QO?
That depends on how he looks at the end of the year. He is 34. If he has a solid year the front office considers it for sure. That is a 2027 problem not a 2023-2026 problem which you have been arguing about. We have needed him and will continue to this year with the Horton and Steele injuries and can not make a trade until July to help the rotation.
 
That depends on how he looks at the end of the year. He is 34. If he has a solid year the front office considers it for sure. That is a 2027 problem not a 2023-2026 problem which you have been arguing about. We have needed him and will continue to this year with the Horton and Steele injuries and can not make a trade until July to help the rotation.
Why do we have to wait till July to make a trade?
 
There is 0 chance Taillon gets a QO, but that has nothing to do with his current contract.

Also, I have no idea if he'll be resigned (for cheaper), but that also has nothing to do with anything that's being talked about.
 
Philosophically where I align, and have been this way for years, is that the Cubs should ALWAYS have a paid true Ace and a paid #2, spending $60-70M on both arms. Every other starter should be a team and cost controlled arm.

3-5 years ago, the Cubs were not in a position to do this due to poor organizational planning, hence the Taillon, Shota, Stroman, Rae, Boyd, Davies, Williams, Smyly deals. They were $8-17M deals for #3, 4, and 5 starters because you needed arms as you had none developed.

As books clear, I do foresee the Cubs wanting to be more aligned with my philosophy - Cabrera, Horton, Steele, Birdsell, Wicks, Wiggins being cheap allows for you to get the Skubals and Peraltas. Unfortunately, 4 of those 5 now have serious injuries
 
Do you think he should be resigned? Or worth a QO?
No on a QO, and maybe resign if the price tag and years are right. Depends on who they are in on in the offseason and how he finishes out this year I would entertain bringing him back if the fit is right. You can do a lot worse than him as one of your last 2 guys in the rotation. Having someone that is already familiar with the organization and proven to be fairly reliable and healthy is a plus. Guys that can eat 5-7 innings consistently at the backend of your rotation will always have some value and he will not have an issue finding a job in the free agent market.

I don't get your obsession with him. You aren't this hard on Boyd and he makes $17 mil too. Between those 2 right now I have more concerns on Boyd this season than I do Jamo. Taillon has gone 4.2 6 6 6 5 and 7 innings in his starts this year and the Cubs are 4-2 in his starts. One of those losses was his first start that he threw 85 pitches in 4.2 innings and we lost 2-0 and he didn't give up a run. Boyd 3.2 5.2 4.2 4 innings 2-2 in his 4 starts and an IL stint. I'm starting to think we got lightning in a bottle with Boyd early last season when he was healthy and now he's come back down to earth a bit. Health was an issue for him in the past as he threw more innings last year than he had for almost the 4 seasons prior combined.
 
It would be incredibly rare and expensive to see a trade for a meaningful piece so I wouldn’t expect it.

Name I’m seeing the most right now is Bubic.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron