Must be the fight song.Is there some sense of "pride" you have that comes with them playing in Illinois? Just win f'ing games.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Must be the fight song.Is there some sense of "pride" you have that comes with them playing in Illinois? Just win f'ing games.
The optics are dumb but hard to fault Chicago and Illinois for not bending over like Indiana did. People are still going to stay in Chicago when going to Bears games so they’ll still have people staying, eating, and drinking but don’t have to give away $5 billion of free money to the Bears.
Significantly less people are going to do this than before.The optics are dumb but hard to fault Chicago and Illinois for not bending over like Indiana did. People are still going to stay in Chicago when going to Bears games so they’ll still have people staying, eating, and drinking but don’t have to give away $5 billion of free money to the Bears.
Are they though? And what percent of fans even stay in hotels regardless as opposed to being local?Significantly less people are going to do this than before.
No, it’s more that fans of politic/parties care more about this than fans of BearsIllinois doesn't have the money. Indiana does.
Unlikely, but even if true, there’s no loss. The state and city aren’t spending anythingSignificantly less people are going to do this than before.
No, it’s more that fans of politic/parties care more about this than fans of Bears
Chicago bloc (Democrats) rather have Hammond. Many Illinois republicans rather have them leave because they think this is a political loss for Pritzker and incumbent Democrats
I can’t imagine this is anything but good for Illinois taxpayers. Indiana is offering to pick up the tab for the extortion in keeping a NFL team
That AH development was just going to take business from existing properties that would pay more in taxes if Bears got their way, like Old Orchard
Of course Illinois has the money. It's about not sticking the taxpayers with a large part of the cost when the Soldier Field renovation from years ago isn't even payed off yet.Illinois doesn't have the money. Indiana does.
"The Lakers moved to Los Angeles, where there are no lakes. The Jazz moved to Utah, where they don't allow music."Maybe it’s just being born and raised in the Midwest, but the bears in Indiana is just going to be so odd, and still be called the Chicago Bears. Chiefs will still technically be in “Kansas City” so that’s not too odd to me.
I just feel like when your teams name is the name of a city you should actually play in exact city or change name completely.
Didn't the Bears already say they were paying for the full cost of the Stadium to be built in Illinois? They want the road infrastructure paid for and then the property tax certainty. There isn't a team or business going to pay 50 million a year in property taxes. Highest NFL team right now is the Rams and its 14.3 million.Of course Illinois has the money. It's about not sticking the taxpayers with a large part of the cost when the Soldier Field renovation from years ago isn't even payed off yet.
The Bears could easily fund the entire thing. They're one of the richest NFL franchises annually, but unlike the other teams in that top ten, except for last year they've been terrible, haven't gone to the playoffs, and obviously not the Super Bowl either in recent memory.
The news about the board okaying the Hammond proposal doesn't mean much at all. It's basically like them saying, "Well, we're going forward with a plan to build in the solar system area but we don't know exactly where it'll be, but just trust us, because we're super-duper-serious here and it'll be just smashing!"
It's become a game of each side calling the other's bluff with the Bears trying to use Hammond and Arlington Heights as leverage. The Ill legislature called their bluff on AH, so the Bears needed and got another patsy in Hammond. So their bluff has now been called there, and now the Bears are trying really hard to make it look like they're really double-secret-probation type serious about Hammond. Which by the way, like much of Indiana is a complete dump.
There's nothing stopping the Bears from putting a shovel in the ground in Arlington Heights tomorrow. But as of now, the Bears haven't even conducted a traffic study for that area to determine how 80000 fans would get there on a home game Sunday. And by the way, taxpayers would also be on the hook for all the road infrastructure work, which would run into the multi-millions and take years to build. And that would be the case with either AH or Hammond.
Indiana is by no means flush with cash. In fact the state has one of the worst economic outlooks going forward of any state in the country.
capitolnewsillinois.com
What they'll ultimately pay in property taxes is still being negotiated. And the legislature has a Summer session where I'm sure that will be further addressed.Didn't the Bears already say they were paying for the full cost of the Stadium to be built in Illinois? They want the road infrastructure paid for and then the property tax certainty. There isn't a team or business going to pay 50 million a year in property taxes. Highest NFL team right now is the Rams and its 14.3 million.
"Based on current property tax rates in Arlington Heights, the team would pay about $53.2 million annually without tax breaks."
![]()
Report shows how much Bears could pay in Arlington Heights property taxes
Editor's note: This story was updated with a statement from the governor. SZALINSKI’S SUMMARY: The Chicago Bears could receive acapitolnewsillinois.com
Illinois didn’t need to match Indiana thoughI think it’s simpler than that. Indiana will give the Bears like $5 billion in taxpayer money while Illinois would give them $1 billion. I don’t blame Chicago and Illinois for playing hardball against an organization that’s worth $8+ billion. They can pay for their own damn stadium.
No one should be giving a god damn NFL franchise 5 billion dollars. F the Bears.Illinois doesn't have the money. Indiana does.
Unfortunately, the only way to maintain Arlington Heights as an option at the time was to buy it even though doing so gave politicians more leverage on them. It would have sold for other development purposes immediately if they hadn't. Depending on how they parcel it they could actually make a good chunk of money selling it now.It’s 20 miles to the Wolf Lake site, even closer to south side Chicago
Hammond is arguably much better for Chicago than AH site. Chicago will get some of the milk, without buying the cow.
You have to spend money to make a lot of money, but spending no money to get some money is a decent outcome
Assuming the $190millon purchase of AH is indicative of Bears preference for that location, what a misstep by Warren and the Bears to use IN as leverage to get deal for AH
Do we know that will be the case? There was some discussion among Chiccago sports affiliates earlier on that a NW Indiana location might allow them to keep an open air stadium and the "Bear Weather" and lessen the need for a development area operating year round in order to provide the revenue needed to operate in Illinois.I don't live in Illinois or Indiana and never plan to. Hammond is part of Chicagland, so I don't give a **** if they play there. They will still be the "Chicago Bears". The only thing that saddens me is that they will be indoors. That's a shame.
Indiana doesn’t have money either.Illinois doesn't have the money. Indiana does.