NCAA March Madness Men's Bracket Preview

cyclones500

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2010
38,657
26,630
113
Michigan
basslakebeacon.com
Yes please to this bracket. From the Field of 68:

View attachment 143402

I'd take that draw.

For one, we're on 2 line, instead of 3, making Milwaukee much more likely.

SMC/SDSU would be no cakewalk in R32, but I think I prefer ISU having potential "grind-it-out" type of game/opponent in that round compared to potential "can't match scoring pace.” Rebounding and turnovers could pose a challenge, but ISU needs to be in best-version form no matter what. Getting to second weekend "feels" favorable.

From there, several teams in the region have enough inconsistency on resume (UK, Illinois, Wake, Oregon, Missouri, MSU) I’d like our chances.
 

dahliaclone

Well-Known Member
Mar 4, 2007
16,129
24,911
113
Minneapolis
As we should be. Not saying Purdue and Wisconsin and A&M aren’t good but it’s clear we are better with Milan back and I think everyone is taking that into account now.

At full strength we are better than those I mentioned. And probably Tennessee.
 

NiceMarmot

Well-Known Member
Oct 25, 2017
275
977
93
I would also sign up for this region

View attachment 143435



Very unlikely to be in a scenario where we are a 2 and Texas Tech is a 3. Committee forever had a rule that any teams from the same conference that were 1, 2, 3, or 4-seeds had to be in different regions. As conferences are now huge, this can no longer be followed perfectly. As an example, the SEC might have 6 of the top 16, but I do think when they have to put top-4 seeds from the same conference in the same regions, they'll try to set it up so they can't meet until the Elite 8. If we're a 2 or 3-seed, I could see Arizona being the 4 in our region for example.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyclones500

cyclones500

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2010
38,657
26,630
113
Michigan
basslakebeacon.com
Very unlikely to be in a scenario where we are a 2 and Texas Tech is a 3. Committee forever had a rule that any teams from the same conference that were 1, 2, 3, or 4-seeds had to be in different regions. As conferences are now huge, this can no longer be followed perfectly. As an example, the SEC might have 6 of the top 16, but I do think when they have to put top-4 seeds from the same conference in the same regions, they'll try to set it up so they can't meet until the Elite 8. If we're a 2 or 3-seed, I could see Arizona being the 4 in our region for example.
The megaconferences are making some of the bracketing principles more challenge to follow, that's for sure.

Has bracket method had a notable update in the past several years? I'd have to think they're exploring change in a few methods, or else just will continue to adhere as closely as possible and deal with kinks when they arise.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron