What?Which one you talking, MWC, AAC, big 12 or one of the other ones like the big ten and ACC now?
Oh I get it, you’re talking about the additions. Big difference there as I’m sure you know.
What?Which one you talking, MWC, AAC, big 12 or one of the other ones like the big ten and ACC now?
Only on the last two.What?
Oh I get it, you’re talking about the additions. Big difference there as I’m sure you know.
Yeah kinda but they also loaned them close to 50 million. Rutgers is also just super happy to have a home, at least they get a full share in 2 years though.Also, the big ten really screwed Rutgers hard.
So they bring all this money to the big ten and the big ten says, thanks for your money, now we are cutting your check until we feel we have taken enough from you. Truly a nice move by the big ten, lol.Yeah kinda but they also loaned them close to 50 million. Rutgers is also just super happy to have a home, at least they get a full share in 2 years though.
Money is how TV people get what they want.If SEC annual media rights are $5-10 million per school higher, they'll end up in the SEC. Money always wins in realignment.
Agree, relegation/destruction of ORSt and Wazzu wasn't enough for Fed intervention. But if/when additional ACC schools also get relegated/destroyed, intervention does likely occur and it stops IMO.No we’re not because ratings would crater and they couldn’t afford the payouts when you cut that many people out of the equation. If a new league was formed it would most likely look a lot like the P4 currently as far as membership
SEC has trailed behind the big ten money wise for over a decade. That won’t be the deal breaker.If SEC annual media rights are $5-10 million per school higher, they'll end up in the SEC. Money always wins in realignment.
I would be shocked if there was actual govt intervention personally. But whatever happens next to the ACC will be interesting. FSU picked a really bad time to look awful especially with how loud and annoying they have been. Not a good comboAgree, relegation/destruction of ORSt and Wazzu wasn't enough for Fed intervention. But if/when additional ACC schools also get relegated/destroyed, intervention does likely occur and it stops IMO.
I’m half joking, but what’s the $ value of having a propaganda arm in ESPN? Starting the season with 30-40% of the AP Top 25 inevitably shoehorns multiple SEC teams in contention for CFP spots, thus increasing payouts.SEC has trailed behind the big ten money wise for over a decade. That won’t be the deal breaker.
Feds ultimately need to sign off on the House Settlement in order to supersede state NIL laws so I wouldn't be surprised to see realignment be pulled in as well for political reasons, especially if ESPN doesn't pick up their 2027 ACC option by FEB 2025 (and ACC implodes) in advance of House being completely signed off on which is likely IMO.I would be shocked if there was actual govt intervention personally. But whatever happens next to the ACC will be interesting. FSU picked a really bad time to look awful especially with how loud and annoying they have been. Not a good combo
I’m not sure Miami valued as high as people think they are.Money is how TV people get what they want.
Once ND, FSU, Clemson, and Miami are in the B1G or SEC, TV won't really care anymore. There may be more moves but they will be about the ACC falling apart (or not) and the G5 folks consolidating. After that it will be more about the other conferences trying to remain relevant somehow.
It’s a valid point to bring up but it’s hard to say the SEC hasn’t earned some of the benefit of the doubt. Product on the field still matters though and the SEC shouldn’t have a problem getting 3-4 teams in with or without espn. Sadly we all know preseason rankings aren’t going anywhereI’m half joking, but what’s the $ value of having a propaganda arm in ESPN? Starting the season with 30-40% of the AP Top 25 inevitably shoehorns multiple SEC teams in contention for CFP spots, thus increasing payouts.
I see a lot of fans of the "lesser" B10 and SEC schools think this will not happen to them and their school. I am sure the Washington St. and Oregon St. fan bases were saying that the P12 would always be together and if not, someone will want them.No we’re not because ratings would crater and they couldn’t afford the payouts when you cut that many people out of the equation. If a new league was formed it would most likely look a lot like the P4 currently as far as membership
Oregon and Washington signed on for the pennies on the dollar compared to USC and UCLA, so we already have unequal funding in the B10, and I am not talking about a buy in period for those schools.Nope. Only one conference has ever done unequal revenue sharing and we all know how much chaos ensued.
Agreed. i think the tipping point will be once the money peaks and then declines. Then, the big brands in those two leagues will be forced to eat their own.It's already happened to the Big 12 and the PAC-12. The TV stations negotiated the cream of the crop to go to the Big 12 and SEC, which at the time nearly cratered the Big 12 and now gutted the PAC-12. Heck, ESPN tried to kill off the Big 12 by moving brands out of there and shift the others to the AAC.
They'll do to the ACC next and eventually after the dust settles, how much will the tv stations want to keep paying high fees for NW, IL, Rutgers, MD, Indy, Purdue in the Big 10?
What do you mean by that? They get $1 million raises each year for the duration of the current deal and will 100% of the revenue share on the next contract.Oregon and Washington signed on for the pennies on the dollar compared to USC and UCLA, so we already have unequal funding in the B10, and I am not talking about a buy in period for those schools.
They are only getting $30 million to start with, and do get a million dollar increase till the contract runs out in 29/30. More than what they would receive in the P12, but far behind the full share members.What do you mean by that? They get $1 million raises each year for the duration of the current deal and will 100% of the revenue share on the next contract.
What happens to teams ‘ revenues when B10 adds Rutgers and Maryland start getting a full shares? What the timeline for UO and UW to get full shares? Was there a prorata or will that cut into the pie? Trying to determine if the b10 pie is getting bigger or if slices have to get smaller, eventually. Obviously, a new Tv deal solve all that.Oregon and Washington signed on for the pennies on the dollar compared to USC and UCLA, so we already have unequal funding in the B10, and I am not talking about a buy in period for those schools.
They are in a buy in my man. They aren’t getting a limited share forever, that’s my point. A lot of new programs when added take a reduced share. Rutgers still is due to other issuesOregon and Washington signed on for the pennies on the dollar compared to USC and UCLA, so we already have unequal funding in the B10, and I am not talking about a buy in period for those schools.