IMO it's unfair to judge a player for being emotional after a game. Don't teams want players who care that much?
***2023-24 College Football Thread***
- Thread starter Jer
- Start date
To me it looked like a 'we're all human' kind of moment where maybe things got too heavy.
It wouldn't be as much of a thing if he didn't tweet "lol" about Max Duggan getting emotional last year:
That said, I personally don't see "clear obvious #1 draft pick" traits in Williams, but people a lot smarter than me seem to.
Maybe it'll snow and ISU can run some creative 75 yard off tackle runs.
Williams has bust written all over him. He had all the talent and advantages in the world at USC and still was only 7-5. That's not a winner or a leader in the locker room.
I think he'll end up like Jameis Winston or Trubisky, talent but doesn't have the leadership or intangible skills that make an NFL QB.
You know what we need? More bowls in baseball stadiums.
Baseball fans barely go to baseball stadiums anymore, and for football the environment is even worse.
Last edited:
Freeze your ass off, pay a pretty penny for front row seats and be a mile away and seated at near eye level behind the sidelines and unable to see anything.
Yeah it's a fun concept in that 'vintage' type of thing but there's also a reason thry stopped using those stadiums for football.
lol, both could be true. It was worded horribly, and basketball was mixed in where it should have said baseball.
Especially if they have an attorney involved in drafting a contract, these sort of contingencies are almost certainly already in place. People don’t usually report on the minutia of a contract unless it’s relevant for a specific report/issue (see, e.g., Kyler Murray video game clause).
It’s much easier to just report the number and get clicks that way.
Legally these NIL deals can't be pay for play so I doubt there's specific verbiage about playing in a bowl game (or any game).
