Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)

DrShip

Well-Known Member
Dec 30, 2013
252
419
63
Rio, WI
Did you listen to interview? He says that he foresees a super conference and that the Holy War isn’t necessarily “permanent” as there is probably more changes coming within the next 5 years and things could get a blown up again. Around 12 min mark. Hardly anything nefarious.

I get that their fans were extremely vocal but I think people (including CW) need relax until they give a reason to hate them.


I will never relax in my hatred of Utah. Funny enough, they used to be my Pac 12 team. The school itself seems alright, but those fans suck. The arrogant ***** can ingest a satchel of Richards. Borderline Hawkeye/Texas level of insufferability..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yellow Snow

jctisu

Well-Known Member
Jun 11, 2017
8,726
10,674
113
I need someone to just make a giant Game of Thrones parody about realignment. Each conference is a house and each school and commissioner is a particular character.
 

Die4Cy

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2010
14,972
15,857
113
I really liked the idea that the UCLA coach was talking what they should do.
1. Break off football from the rest of sports.
2. Hire a commissioner to run the new super league that is forming.
3. Take the top 64 teams and form 8 divisions with 8 teams each, following geography as a guide.
4. Each team plays 7 games in their division, and then another 4 against another division. So, the West Coast teams play the teams from the Midwest for a 2-year cycle, then maybe the Great Lakes schools for the next 2-year cycle.
5. Each team would have one game per year to play a G5 school or someone like UNI.
6. Players get a split of the money, no more NIL, everyone gets an equal share of the TV contract and no more.

It is a good proposal but it isn't quite that simple. For example, there would probably be no legal basis to end NIL, which courts have ruled is an individual right of the athlete and not something that means it probably could not be collectively bargained.

You might do away with these collectives via an agreement to pay players at some point, but product endorsements and things of that type are here to stay.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: FriendlySpartan

KnappShack

Well-Known Member
May 26, 2008
23,871
32,225
113
Parts Unknown
Did you listen to interview? He says that he foresees a super conference and that the Holy War isn’t necessarily “permanent” as there is probably more changes coming within the next 5 years and things could get a blown up again. Around 12 min mark. Hardly anything nefarious.

I get that their fans were extremely vocal but I think people (including CW) need relax until they give a reason to hate them.



No. No relaxing.
 

Spam

Well-Known Member
May 21, 2008
7,996
2,666
113
Lawsuit was filed in Tallahassee court. In a neutral location I would say FSU didn't stand a chance. But a Tallahassee court?
 

cyatheart

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 18, 2008
9,435
6,943
113
49
This is dumb. They are mad because they got left out, reality is that won’t happen again to the acc champion. It was a fluke this year. I get it they want to leave, but wait the 5 years then move. It doesn’t help to do this now.
 

CyCrazy

Well-Known Member
Dec 17, 2008
27,066
15,301
113
Ames
I will never relax in my hatred of Utah. Funny enough, they used to be my Pac 12 team. The school itself seems alright, but those fans suck. The arrogant ***** can ingest a satchel of Richards. Borderline Hawkeye/Texas level of insufferability..
Utah, Byu and Houston fans are just as bad as UTerus. Let the hate begin.
 

isucy86

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2006
9,132
7,732
113
Dubuque
So we signed a contract under duress in 2016. Then we sat around happily cashing checks until 2023. Then we got screwed by the college football playoff committee. Now we want to come back and complain that the contract was no fair and we want out.

LOL. Good luck with that.
Yea, I don't think duress would be valid. Unless the duress was based on a knowingly false narrative pushed by the ACC Office to its schools to keep the ACC together.

I have to believe FSU feels there were promises made by ACC Office regarding upside to media rights value during 2025-2036 period and doesn't appear they will happen. Those monies might be tied to cable/streaming subscriber #'s or monthly carriage fees.

FSU could also hope lawsuit creates instability within ACC. Enough to have ND jump to Big10, even if NBC is willing to pay ND around $75M/year. I would think if ND buys their way out of ACC, then ESPN might have ability to reopen contract or contractually reduce their existing media rights fee to ACC.
 

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,803
24,900
113
I really liked the idea that the UCLA coach was talking what they should do.
1. Break off football from the rest of sports.
2. Hire a commissioner to run the new super league that is forming.
3. Take the top 64 teams and form 8 divisions with 8 teams each, following geography as a guide.
4. Each team plays 7 games in their division, and then another 4 against another division. So, the West Coast teams play the teams from the Midwest for a 2-year cycle, then maybe the Great Lakes schools for the next 2-year cycle.
5. Each team would have one game per year to play a G5 school or someone like UNI.
6. Players get a split of the money, no more NIL, everyone gets an equal share of the TV contract and no more.

It’s a good proposal that would be best for the fans and the athletes. But it won’t happen because the conference this coach belongs to would lose their financial advantage.
 

MugNight

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jul 27, 2021
2,233
4,083
113
This is dumb. They are mad because they got left out, reality is that won’t happen again to the acc champion. It was a fluke this year. I get it they want to leave, but wait the 5 years then move. It doesn’t help to do this now.
This has been brewing. One of their officials very publicly said something a few years ago like it’s a travesty that UCF is making more conference money than FSU.

I agree with you. I just think they’re getting antsy and now it’s come to a head
 

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,803
24,900
113
Yea, I don't think duress would be valid. Unless the duress was based on a knowingly false narrative pushed by the ACC Office to its schools to keep the ACC together.

I have to believe FSU feels there were promises made by ACC Office regarding upside to media rights value during 2025-2036 period and doesn't appear they will happen. Those monies might be tied to cable/streaming subscriber #'s or monthly carriage fees.

FSU could also hope lawsuit creates instability within ACC. Enough to have ND jump to Big10, even if NBC is willing to pay ND around $75M/year. I would think if ND buys their way out of ACC, then ESPN might have ability to reopen contract or contractually reduce their existing media rights fee to ACC.

From what has been released so far, it seems their better route would be to fight the validity based on the agreements made that weren’t in the original paperwork (based on claims by FSU and not corroborated). If that’s true that the commissioner adjusted the deal without knowledge of the schools, it may give a way to get out. Should’ve made them all initial every page like you do with mortgages.

And remember, they’re not trying to invalidate the deal with ESPN. They’re trying to invalidate the GOR with the ACC. So it’s based on whether they can prove the conference was untruthful to them.
 

isucy86

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2006
9,132
7,732
113
Dubuque
Wait, so could ESPN end the deal with the ACC after 2025 if it wanted to? Is that what I am getting from this?
That was my question as well. It sure looks like ESPN has the option to renew or set payment.

So maybe FSU's bluster is to give ESPN and/or Notre Dame pause to remain partners with ACC.
 

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,507
74,246
113
Ankeny
Exactly. I remember a lot of "Dumb" emoticons being throw around from those folks as well. I'd love to hear their take on the today's events, not just about how "iron clad" the GOR is. Obviously there will be legal arguments and a court decision in the future so no need to debate that. I somehow doubt there will be a back room negotiation on this one.

Everyone said they'd be stupid to. They're still stupid to. There's no real case here. They signed what they signed up for knowing full well the decision they made. That they're now mad about it after cashing the checks for several years isn't a valid reason to get out of the contract they signed.
 

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,507
74,246
113
Ankeny
ACC already counter sued in NC, location isn’t going to matter on this one

Yep. That lawsuit asserts that the jurisdiction is in NC.

And past precedent would indicate they'll win that, as they already did in a similar case vs Maryland when they left.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cloniac2

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,507
74,246
113
Ankeny
It will be settled, and FSU will exit. Maryland sued the ACC, and ACC countersued in 2014. They settled, and Maryland went to the Big 10. That's all FSU is hoping for, with larger stakes.

Maryland only owed about 50 mil to leave at the time. The ACC settled for an amount less than that, but likely was at the breakeven point between what they settled for and what litigation would have cost.

FSU's departure would cost them something like half a billion dollars. The settlement point is massively higher.
 

cykadelic2

Well-Known Member
Jun 10, 2006
4,009
1,749
113
From what has been released so far, it seems their better route would be to fight the validity based on the agreements made that weren’t in the original paperwork (based on claims by FSU and not corroborated). If that’s true that the commissioner adjusted the deal without knowledge of the schools, it may give a way to get out. Should’ve made them all initial every page like you do with mortgages.

And remember, they’re not trying to invalidate the deal with ESPN. They’re trying to invalidate the GOR with the ACC. So it’s based on whether they can prove the conference was untruthful to them.
Agree, this is what any settlement will boil down to IMO, not the GOR itself which is good for the B12.
 

isucy86

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2006
9,132
7,732
113
Dubuque
A COUPLE THINGS.

1. FSU isnt going anywhere that doesnt give them a full share. it's a blue blood.

2. I think the BIG will offer FSU and UNC jointly, and just let the lawyers fight it out. When the BIG took maryland, they let the lawyers fight the gor and ended up paying 50 million to get the terps.

BIG will pay WAY more than 50 to get UNC and FSU.

3. The SEC wont let the BIG take UNC without a fight. UVA and UNC would both be takes for the SEC. VT is a complication. Not sure the SEC will double down on Virginia. BIG isnt taking VT. BIG and SEC may reach a deal on who gets what--maybe they split the virginia schools. i doubt the state of virginia would block a deal
where both UVA and VT got homes in the power 2.

4. There will be some nice leftovers for the big 12. My reasonable 4: Pitt, Miami, VT, and NC State. would yormark take 6? doubtful, but Louisville and Duke would be nice for hoops.
Couple things.

1. Gotta believe FSU will take less than a full share for a short (3-5 years) window if it gets them out of ACC. Especially, if their cost to litigate/penalties are lower than expected.

2. There are reports that Virginia and Virginia Tech are tied to the hip by their BOR. Unlike UNC and NCST. That doesn't mean they would both need to go to same conference, but both would need homes in Big10/SEC or maybe UVA subsidizes VT if UVA is in Big10/SEC and VT is in ACC/Big12.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron