Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)

BCClone

Well Seen Member.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2011
67,645
63,707
113
Not exactly sure.
Well, I said we were closer to the geographic outliers. I guess Houston is a bit closer to UCF but we are much closer to Cincy and WVU than anyone else.

I agree we are closer to KU and KSU than CU but when it comes to air travel those distances are shortened. Besides, who would CU go with?

Obviously this is all caveated with the significant possibility they don't do pods but if they do, I really fail to see anyone other than ISU or Houston getting the eastern pod. I suppose the conference could give every pod a Texas school for recruiting. That is probably our best hope.
Houston would go to what you called the outliers, it would give them their 2 other AAC rivals to continue with. OSU would be with the Texas school for the remnants of the Big 12 south, and ISU would go in where OSU was.
 

Big_Sill

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 4, 2008
1,590
2,423
113
43
ASU and Arizona will always play

Utah and BYU will always play

KSU and KU will always play

The rest should be as flexible as possible. No pods, no divisions no protected rivals…blank canvas each preseason to max out matchups and interest.
 
Last edited:

MugNight

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jul 27, 2021
2,233
4,083
113
ISU and KSU have the longest uninterrupted series in FBS. They should absolutely play EVERY year.
I see our KSU rivalry like Florida-Georgia and the Sunflower rivalry like Florida-Florida State.

The XII should incentivize as many rivalries as possible for compelling games. We should play KSU, KU, OSU and maybe CU every year. Mix in Baylor and WVU every so often too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CascadeClone

CascadeClone

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2009
10,878
13,956
113
protected rivalries solve all these issues with pod construction. There is absolutely no reason to do pods
Yep, its like having pods for scheduling simplicity/balance, but you don't have to have all 4 teams all protected with just themselves - you can mix and match.

e.g. - you want ISU to play KSU, OSU, and CU every year. But you want KSU to play ISU, KU, and OSU every year. With pods, you can't do it. But with PR you can - it just takes some finagling at the back end and you will probably have a couple weird ones to complete the set. I might do the new Big12 just for fun today if time allows.
 

CYCLNST8

Well-Known Member
Jul 19, 2008
11,368
13,516
113
Urbandale
www.gimikk.com
Don't overthink it. 4 scheduling "divisions." 9 conference games. 3 annual (protected rivalries); 6 rotating. Top two records play for conference title. Tie breakers determined by playoff ranking. Divisional finish means nothing other than bragging rights.

Cincinnati
Houston
UCF
West Virginia

Colorado
Iowa State
Kansas
Kansas State

Baylor
Oklahoma State
TCU
Texas Tech

Arizona
Arizona State
BYU
Utah
 

Big_Sill

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 4, 2008
1,590
2,423
113
43
I see our KSU rivalry like Florida-Georgia and the Sunflower rivalry like Florida-Florida State.

The XII should incentivize as many rivalries as possible for compelling games. We should play KSU, KU, OSU and maybe CU every year. Mix in Baylor and WVU every so often too.
Does anyone outside of our fanbases view ISU vs. KSU as compelling or a rivalry game?
 

KnappShack

Well-Known Member
May 26, 2008
23,866
32,217
113
Parts Unknown
I see our KSU rivalry like Florida-Georgia and the Sunflower rivalry like Florida-Florida State.

The XII should incentivize as many rivalries as possible for compelling games. We should play KSU, KU, OSU and maybe CU every year. Mix in Baylor and WVU every so often too.

The TV guys keep telling us they like rivalry games.

We should brand every goddam rivalry game. Makeup rivalry games and give them a cool name. Sell rights.

No clue why someone would want to sideline the oldest continuously rivalry in college football history

That makes zero sense
 

MugNight

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jul 27, 2021
2,233
4,083
113
Does anyone outside of our fanbases view ISU vs. KSU as compelling or a rivalry game?
I’d hope so. I’ve heard people suggest it, but a half Cardinal/half Purple tractor would be a very cool trophy. Or the schools have to plant corn/wheat in a certain patch of field on campus depending on who wins.
They could really make Farmageddon something huge. Hell, attach sponsorship to a Pro-Ag outreach group and really help some farmers and rural communities.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NWICY

clone37

Well-Known Member
Oct 9, 2010
243
515
93
ASU and Arizona will always play

Utah and BYU will always play

KSU and KU will always play

The rest should be as flexible as possible. No pods, no divisions no protected rivals…blank canvas each preseason to max out matchups and interest.
Agree with these 3 matchups. I also think ISU and CU should play every year. Maybe even TTU and OSU?
 

Jeffrey Scott

Well-Known Member
Sep 28, 2017
292
303
63
71
I'm thinking an annual game with KSU and OKST is where we start. Honestly, a protected game with any of the Hateful Eight would be a good thing. Let's reward our fans and show the country that the remaining eighty teams called out Texas and Oklahoma and we will now thrive. No pods.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NWICY

AuH2O

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2013
12,999
20,961
113
Does anyone outside of our fanbases view ISU vs. KSU as compelling or a rivalry game?
No, but that’s the case with all but a handful of rivalries. People know other rivalries better, and assume in state games are rivalries, but there are only a handful of rivalries that people nationally are compelled to watch because of the rivalry. The number of rivalries that have significant national viewership beyond being a function of how interesting the individual teams is pretty small.

Protected rivalries in a vast majority of cases is to ensure interest within those fanbases.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 2speedy1