i like to pod off into jarsSorry. I will stick to talking about masturbating into jars.
i like to pod off into jarsSorry. I will stick to talking about masturbating into jars.
Houston would go to what you called the outliers, it would give them their 2 other AAC rivals to continue with. OSU would be with the Texas school for the remnants of the Big 12 south, and ISU would go in where OSU was.Well, I said we were closer to the geographic outliers. I guess Houston is a bit closer to UCF but we are much closer to Cincy and WVU than anyone else.
I agree we are closer to KU and KSU than CU but when it comes to air travel those distances are shortened. Besides, who would CU go with?
Obviously this is all caveated with the significant possibility they don't do pods but if they do, I really fail to see anyone other than ISU or Houston getting the eastern pod. I suppose the conference could give every pod a Texas school for recruiting. That is probably our best hope.
That's better than pods.Sorry. I will stick to talking about masturbating into jars.
ASU and Arizona will always play
Utah and BYU will always play
The rest should be as flexible as possible. No pods, no divisions… blank canvas each preseason to max out matchups and interest.
Good point on KSU and KU, disagree on ISU and KSU.ISU and KSU should always play.
KSU and KU should always play.
ISU and KSU have the longest uninterrupted series in FBS. They should absolutely play EVERY year.Good point on KSU and KU, disagree on ISU and KSU.
I hope most years ISU and KSU play… but we have no reason to mandate it.
I see our KSU rivalry like Florida-Georgia and the Sunflower rivalry like Florida-Florida State.ISU and KSU have the longest uninterrupted series in FBS. They should absolutely play EVERY year.
Yep, its like having pods for scheduling simplicity/balance, but you don't have to have all 4 teams all protected with just themselves - you can mix and match.protected rivalries solve all these issues with pod construction. There is absolutely no reason to do pods
Does anyone outside of our fanbases view ISU vs. KSU as compelling or a rivalry game?I see our KSU rivalry like Florida-Georgia and the Sunflower rivalry like Florida-Florida State.
The XII should incentivize as many rivalries as possible for compelling games. We should play KSU, KU, OSU and maybe CU every year. Mix in Baylor and WVU every so often too.
I see our KSU rivalry like Florida-Georgia and the Sunflower rivalry like Florida-Florida State.
The XII should incentivize as many rivalries as possible for compelling games. We should play KSU, KU, OSU and maybe CU every year. Mix in Baylor and WVU every so often too.
I’d hope so. I’ve heard people suggest it, but a half Cardinal/half Purple tractor would be a very cool trophy. Or the schools have to plant corn/wheat in a certain patch of field on campus depending on who wins.Does anyone outside of our fanbases view ISU vs. KSU as compelling or a rivalry game?
Agree with these 3 matchups. I also think ISU and CU should play every year. Maybe even TTU and OSU?ASU and Arizona will always play
Utah and BYU will always play
KSU and KU will always play
The rest should be as flexible as possible. No pods, no divisions no protected rivals…blank canvas each preseason to max out matchups and interest.
Let's dump 'Farmageddon' for something more apt, such as 'GMO Game', as a tribute to how we've improved our prairies.ISU and KSU have the longest uninterrupted series in FBS. They should absolutely play EVERY year.
No, but that’s the case with all but a handful of rivalries. People know other rivalries better, and assume in state games are rivalries, but there are only a handful of rivalries that people nationally are compelled to watch because of the rivalry. The number of rivalries that have significant national viewership beyond being a function of how interesting the individual teams is pretty small.Does anyone outside of our fanbases view ISU vs. KSU as compelling or a rivalry game?