Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)

SEIOWA CLONE

Well-Known Member
Dec 19, 2018
6,793
6,989
113
63
The EIU fanbase seems to think that since they currently are a member of the Big easy, that every member along with the SEC schools will some day make up this NFL light super conference. What they seem to be forgetting is if this conference does occur, the Blue Bloods will break away, and start their own new league, and just because you are currently in the Big Easy or the SEC does not mean that you are fore sure going to make it into the new league.

As much as EIU fans love to scream that no schools have value in the B12, I would offer the thought that schools like Ok. State, TCU and even Baylor have done more than EIU has over the past 20 years, and that even though their attendance is good, Iowa is a small state, and their attendance is not a lot larger than what ISU gets in what they call a HS field.
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: ISUalways and Cyhig

2speedy1

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2014
6,634
7,487
113
Some serious talk out there that Stan and Cal might go to the ACC.

That is a lot of travel, for them, for less money, I know I have downplayed the travel, but the ACC is about as far away, every game, as you can get from the Bay area. At least in the B12 and B1G there are midwest teams and Mountain teams that are half the distance or less.

But I also question, if they do go to the ACC, are they just hitching their wagons to the next sinking ship.

So if FSU, Clemson, etc figure out how to get out, sooner or later, is the ACC just going to break up and then STan and Cal will be out again.

I guess it may get them down the road until the next round.

I am curious if they merge with the MTW, and come up with some form of rebranded PAC....to attempt to maintain their status moving forward, for the playoff etc.

I do think something is going have to happen soon because those 4 have no conference in less than a year.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: FriendlySpartan

SCNCY

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 11, 2009
10,688
8,502
113
37
La Fox, IL
Some serious talk out there that Stan and Cal might go to the ACC.

That is a lot of travel, for them, for less money, I know I have downplayed the travel, but the ACC is about as far away, every game, as you can get from the Bay area. At least in the B12 and B1G there are midwest teams and Mountain teams that are half the distance or less.

But I also question, if they do go to the ACC, are they just hitching their wagons to the next sinking ship.

So if FSU, Clemson, etc figure out how to get out, sooner or later, is the ACC just going to break up and then STan and Cal will be out again.

I guess it may get them down the road until the next round.

I am curious if they merge with the MTW, and come up with some form of rebranded PAC....to attempt to maintain their status moving forward, for the playoff etc.

I do think something is going have to happen soon because those 4 have no conference in less than a year.

If those two go to ACC, it’ll increase the conferences chances if surviving when they get raided by Big10 and SEC. Now, will those two be enough? I don’t know, probably who has the better media deal when the time comes.
 

Cyhig

Well-Known Member
Nov 29, 2017
3,251
6,800
113
You don't think what the SEC and B1G have been doing is a sustainable thing?
Nope. Because at some point these national brand football teams will withdraw from the ncaa and form their own independent league where they control their own rules, including payment of players in salary (not in form of NIL or scholarships). ESPN, Fox, NBC will work together with this new league, much like the NFL. The league will have their own commissioner, just like the NFL.

Why? Money. Networks know viewership will be sky high if **each week** there would be headline games such as Ohio State vs Georgia, Texas vs Alabama, Michigan vs. Clemson, Michigan vs Florida State. Teams would be willing to join this new league for money and prestige.

Will this happen? We don’t know for sure. But I can say what the Big 10 and SEC have now isn’t sustainable. Teams like Mizzou, Vandy, the entire Big 10 west, etc., won’t be included in this new league (well, possibly Nebraska from the big 10 west)

Edit: I know you think that’s funny, Gonzo, but people would had laughed 15 years ago if you said the Big 10 would stretch from LA to New Jersey.
 
Last edited:

FriendlySpartan

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2021
9,611
10,101
113
38
Holy cat fight and triggered Big Ten fans in here. Still getting through the last five pages but it’s cute how triggered they get when anyone suggests the power brokers in the SEC and Big Ten may do their own thing down the road and remove the Vandys and NWs of the world.

Look the conferences are loyal right now, and that’s a fact. Let’s see what happens if and when the money starts to level off or go down per school. That’s when you find how “loyal” these school presidents and big wigs are.
I’m just salty I was on vacation and missed 150+ pages of realignment lol. Whole year of random speculation and gone for the actual action, just classic.
 

Gonzo

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2009
26,744
31,094
113
Behind you
The EIU fanbase seems to think that since they currently are a member of the Big easy, that every member along with the SEC schools will some day make up this NFL light super conference. What they seem to be forgetting is if this conference does occur, the Blue Bloods will break away, and start their own new league, and just because you are currently in the Big Easy or the SEC does not mean that you are fore sure going to make it into the new league.

As much as EIU fans love to scream that no schools have value in the B12, I would offer the thought that schools like Ok. State, TCU and even Baylor have done more than EIU has over the past 20 years, and that even though their attendance is good, Iowa is a small state, and their attendance is not a lot larger than what ISU gets in what they call a HS field.
I have no doubt that if your big superconference one day happens that Iowa will be left out. I just don't think it's going to happen anytime soon, if ever.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: SEIOWA CLONE

Die4Cy

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2010
14,972
15,857
113
You don't think what the SEC and B1G have been doing is a sustainable thing?
The forces that have been pulling at the threads of college football ever since the 1984 OU decision in the Supreme Court are always going to be there. The fact that the SEC and B1G have been largely exempt from them so far isn't consequential. It just hasn't been your turn yet.

The degree to which our B1G posters come in here and insist "nothing bad can happen" in a forum of a school that has been through this stuff three times in fifteen years tells me you get it, even if you don't want to admit it.
 

exCyDing

Well-Known Member
Nov 29, 2017
5,610
10,105
113
Like I said around $300M. That is based on $100M in exit fee and $200M in media $ from the ACC deal with ESPN through 2036. When Maryland left the ACC their exit fee was a little over $50M and they negotiated it down to something like $32M.

I would be surprised if there are additional damages as the exit fee and GOR are the contract language used to collect damages.

I am no expert on the GOR language. My understanding is the GOR only applies to a school's home athletic contests. So is Championships money excluded? The ACC deal with Disney/ESPN is somewhere around $20M annually per school. The other half of an ACC schools media $ comes from Championships. FSU would leave their historical units for participating in the NCAA Hoops Tournament behind. But if FSU moved to the Big10- it would seem the Big10 would get CFP money based on FSU being a Big10 member.

Language from Athletic Article

What’s a grant of rights? In the world of college sports, it’s an agreement in which schools agree to transfer their media rights to their conference for a set period of time. For example, Baylor’s agreement to be part of the Big 12’s grant of rights means that the rights fee for any televised sporting event emanating from Baylor’s campus is owned by the Big 12 until the grant expires. Replace “Baylor” and “Big 12” with “North Carolina” and “ACC” or “Oregon State” and “Pac-12.”

I would agree the incremental money for being in Big10/SEC will be around $40M annually, or over $500M through 2036.
I’d expect the ACC to play hardball with FSU or any others that want to leave. The ACC doesn’t have to sell their rights back, nobody could make them. We’re probably on two ends of the spectrum on this.

I could see one spot where the ACC might be willing to negotiate something - if FSU can devise a legal strategy that might very well succeed in blowing up the GOR for everyone the SEC & B10 might want. The only thing worse than facing an existential threat in 13 years is facing one now. ACC schools - even those that might face relegation - might take the windfall in that case and hope for the best.

Of course, Fox & ESPN would have to be willing to pay full shares at least 4 if not 6 in the SEC & B10, otherwise it’s still an empty threat as a half- or 3/4 share probably isn’t going to get enough $$ to pay the negotiation until the 2030s.
 

Cyhig

Well-Known Member
Nov 29, 2017
3,251
6,800
113
Yeah clearly the B1G and SEC are super fragile right now. Lol.
Nobody is saying this super conference will happen in the near future. But when the ACC GOR is up, everything is on the table. People like myself are looking 10-15 years from now.

Is Iowa safe for the immediate future? Of course. Same can be said for Iowa State. But what each conference has isn’t sustainable for the long term.

And note that even people who are envisioning one super conference are not saying they want a super conference. If it were me, there would be conferences of 8 teams all regionally based.
 

FerShizzle

person slash genius
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Feb 5, 2013
16,096
20,024
113
Des Moines
The super conference stuff starts to draw lots of congressional intervention and an insane amount of lawsuits.

I think the Big Ten and SEC can live with this setup.
I think it’s much more likely that those 2 conferences try and marginalize the rest by only scheduling games amongst themselves. Except for Iowa which will still play a couple MAC schools and say the rest of their schedule is too tough to justify playing a big 12 team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1UNI2ISU

MeanDean

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
Jan 5, 2009
14,632
20,880
113
Blue Grass IA-Jensen Beach FL
The real litmus test is going to be what happens on future contracts that have plateaued or have peaked and begun going down. When there's less of a pie to split X ways is when we will find out just how benevolent the likes of Michigan, Ohio St, Alabama, Georgia, and Texas will continue being toward the rest of their conference.
Exactly.

If the next media contract is similar or only a bit larger than now the big names will be expecting/suggesting that Northwestern, Vandy, Indiana, Rutgers etc get smaller shares - based on the number of eye-balls on media making the money for the networks.

If the big boys tell them they get 35Mil and the name teams get 70Mil what are they going to do. If the money is still better than they can get going to Big XII or ACC. They'll just grumble and take the cash.
 

FriendlySpartan

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2021
9,611
10,101
113
38
Nobody is saying this super conference will happen in the near future. But when the ACC GOR is up, everything is on the table. People like myself are looking 10-15 years from now.

Is Iowa safe for the immediate future? Of course. Same can be said for Iowa State. But what each conference has isn’t sustainable for the long term.

And note that even people who are envisioning one super conference are not saying they want a super conference. If it were me, there would be conferences of 8 teams all regionally based.
I guess that’s the problem. I can’t tell you with a high degree of certainty that something won’t happen that far out. But to the same point it’s futile to try to think that far out. 15 years ago in 2008 no one would have even believed or thought of Rutgers to the big ten. Let alone the LA schools. We don’t even know what the media landscape would look 15 years from now. 15 years ago Netflix was only a dvd sevice and a new one at that. That’s just so long to be saying anything with any confidence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: royalcy

exCyDing

Well-Known Member
Nov 29, 2017
5,610
10,105
113
Nobody is saying this super conference will happen in the near future. But when the ACC GOR is up, everything is on the table. People like myself are looking 10-15 years from now.

Is Iowa safe for the immediate future? Of course. Same can be said for Iowa State. But what each conference has isn’t sustainable for the long term.

And note that even people who are envisioning one super conference are not saying they want a super conference. If it were me, there would be conferences of 8 teams all regionally based.
I think the cracks might start to show if the next B10 deal (2030?) isn’t richer than the current, and will pick up speed if the SEC’s isn’t (2034?). It’s Important to note, I don’t believe either conference has a GOR.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron