I really don't think we have to stretch far with CU/AZ now.
Would we really want to double up Utah's small population market when we can get into ACC markets soon?
There might be some advantage to having the same 16 as SEC and Big Ten.
If it's Oregon and Washington that get us to 16 you can make some arguments that the football quality is deeper than the Big Ten and basketball is going to be tops no matter who we add from here.
If the opportunity is there, I think you level up at 16 for now. The only reason to stop at 14 would be at the request of ESPN or Fox balking at putting up the additional funds. However, you've got to think both were planning on this eventuality with how they've handled the PAC negotiations.
Between ASU, Utah, AZ, WA and OR, which are the three least stupid? My money's on AZ, OR and WA. I don't understand ASU's hostility, or Utah's infatuation with all things PAC.