Cryptocurrency

BryceC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 23, 2006
26,462
19,621
113
The treatment SBF has received from mainstream media has been awful. In some ways SBF is a far worse offender than Madoff ever was. The media has been extremely passive and even sympathetic at times to SBF. Best not to bite the hand that feeds I guess.

Much worse than Madoff. But Madoff bilked movers and shakers in NYC, and SBF bilked many smaller people, and his scheme is a lot harder to understand.

Also, SBF was a proponent of Effective Altruism, so his outward life is hard to square for some people with what he did.
 

CascadeClone

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2009
10,878
13,959
113
LOL!!! This is no other point of view, he is a crook. The dude stole billions.
I am not 100% sure that he is a crook per se, or a scammer (which is the word being used a lot around here).

From what I have read (and in fairness, just following casually), it seems to me like there is at least some possibility he just had zero idea of what he was doing from a business standpoint. Both in terms of what is legal/allowable, and how to be prudent in running a business. But had about 1000x more hubris that was good for him.
  • He just kept buying companies in trouble, and assumed the money tree would fund it all, and he would make it work because he was so smart.
  • When his one company needed billions, he took it from different company and moved it - acting like they were all 100% his and there were no rules on doing that, or other claims on the money. Or that he could break the rules, and just put the money back once the money tree took care of it, and by the time the dust he would just pay a fine.
  • There was no one else involved available to say "hey you can't do that" like, idk, a seasoned CFO or a Board Member to hit the brakes and prevent that kind of egregious violation. Just everyone in charge way too enamored of their own intelligence and infallibility.
So it's possible that it wasn't a scam with malice aforethought.

But all that said, it definitely could be that he knew exactly what was doing and was trying to sneak out as much silverware as possible before the house burned down. If there's some smoking gun stuff out there let me know, I haven't been following that close.

Note- I am talking about SBF particularly, not crypto in general, of which I am very skeptical.
 

BCClone

Well Seen Member.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2011
67,649
63,712
113
Not exactly sure.
I am not 100% sure that he is a crook per se, or a scammer (which is the word being used a lot around here).

From what I have read (and in fairness, just following casually), it seems to me like there is at least some possibility he just had zero idea of what he was doing from a business standpoint. Both in terms of what is legal/allowable, and how to be prudent in running a business. But had about 1000x more hubris that was good for him.
  • He just kept buying companies in trouble, and assumed the money tree would fund it all, and he would make it work because he was so smart.
  • When his one company needed billions, he took it from different company and moved it - acting like they were all 100% his and there were no rules on doing that, or other claims on the money. Or that he could break the rules, and just put the money back once the money tree took care of it, and by the time the dust he would just pay a fine.
  • There was no one else involved available to say "hey you can't do that" like, idk, a seasoned CFO or a Board Member to hit the brakes and prevent that kind of egregious violation. Just everyone in charge way too enamored of their own intelligence and infallibility.
So it's possible that it wasn't a scam with malice aforethought.

But all that said, it definitely could be that he knew exactly what was doing and was trying to sneak out as much silverware as possible before the house burned down. If there's some smoking gun stuff out there let me know, I haven't been following that close.

Note- I am talking about SBF particularly, not crypto in general, of which I am very skeptical.
His CFO, from what I remember from the interview,is turning on SBF in a CYA style. She is saying he knew everything he was doing and advised him against it some.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: CascadeClone

JustAnotherTimeline

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2021
2,192
214
63
43
A finance professor weighs in on crypto.


 

flycy

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2008
2,336
2,519
113
Crescent, IA
Much worse than Madoff. But Madoff bilked movers and shakers in NYC, and SBF bilked many smaller people, and his scheme is a lot harder to understand.

Also, SBF was a proponent of Effective Altruism, so his outward life is hard to square for some people with what he did.
It is really really easy to give away other people's money. Just ask your congressman/woman.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron