Twitter

Status
Not open for further replies.
I would rather face-to-face with Brent, Jared or Chris in attendance.
giphy.webp
 
Musk is an overrated businessman.

Tesla is not a great company it is just the first and best funded fully electric car company. Tesla has double the market cap of Toyota the next largest car company. A large reason it has been as “successful” as it has is the influx of cash they get from shareholders and the government subsidies they get. Their cars are not that great and once electric cars from legacy manufacturers are readily available it will fail.

Spacex is not in an industry that is meant to be profitable at this point. It is his best company but it isn’t like he has done anything that great with it.

Twitter will not fully shut down but it will eventually be like MySpace without serious changes in leadership.
I’m not jumping into the Twitter discussion mess but have you owned an electric car? I’ve had a Nissan Leaf and a Mercedes Benz, both are horrible in comparison to a Tesla. I’ve test driven a few other brands and none compare. It’s not even close and it will take the legacy manufacturers a while to catch up.
 
Please show me where there was a court order forcing him to complete the transaction. He completed it on time and for the amount that he signed in the SPA.

You obviously don't. Elon musk was crazy not to exercise his rights under the MAC clause. It would have been dereliction of duty if he hadn't.
There wasn't a "court order" because he signed a contract to buy it. Then he made all kinds of claims - counting on his fanboiz to defend him - to try and get out of that contract. And after some legal posturing, he did honor the terms of the contract rather than taking it to court.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CyDude16
The zoom with Gunnar was a joke. Your fascination with meeting people is.....interesting.
Why didn't you answer if this is your first username? I don't think you did the last time I asked you too.
Yes it is, but why does that matter if I've had one or 50 names?

Let's take the mask off.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: CyDude16
There wasn't a "court order" because he signed a contract to buy it. Then he made all kinds of claims - counting on his fanboiz to defend him - to try and get out of that contract. And after some legal posturing, he did honor the terms of the contract rather than taking it to court.
You have obviously never bought a company under a stock purchase agreement and understand the implications of the Mac clause.
 
I read something a few months ago before he completed the purchase that he:
1. was co-founder of one of PayPals predeccesors (X.com). X.com was sold and became PayPal.
2. has purchased X.com back from PayPal
3. has plans to take Twitter into a payment/finance direction, maybe incorporating X.com somehow.

With that, maybe he doesn't give a rat's ass what happens to the Twitter platform as it was, because he has different plans for it altogether. That was all pure speculation. I would think, if he can get Twitter to actually turn a profit, maybe he keeps the current version around.

1668889966344.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Help Support Us

Become a patron