Their mobile qb is probably the only reason they are in the game
*** Official SEMO vs IOWA STATE Game(Day) Thread ***
- Thread starter CycloneRulzzz
- Start date
CycloneErik
Well-Known Member
Unfortunately, most of the B12 have mobile QBs.
And good receivers and and and.
They've been better this half so there's that but I was thinking the D would be the strength today.
Dekkers has completed passes to TEN different receivers
never thought I'd see the day everyone is ******** about a 3 score lead in a season opener
Again I don't think we've been that bad other than an ability to open field tackle ( not just related to us) and inability to contain a mobile QB (again, not only repeated to us)
- We're up 18
- Young kickers have avoided mistakes
- Few penalties
- 7 for 11 on 3rd downs
- We've averaging 5 yards a carry
- They're running backs have 9 yards on 7 carries
-50% completion
- 3 points came off a bad pick and a 7 yard field
- They're at 33% 3rd down conversion
Again, other than they're QB making something out of nothing and our secondary not being as good as I'd like or having 9 sacks...
where have we sucked? will we have ups and downs? Yes. But if you look at the game in entirety, there is not one area I'd say we sucked. Given the amount of change - this game has gone really really well
KidSilverhair
Well-Known Member
That was SEMO pulling the trick of substituting late in the play clock. Only 2 seconds left when the ref moved away from the center to let ISU snap it. Who kept pulling that crap against us last year? Was it K State, I can’t remember.
Who's complaining about the lead amount?
The D has looked bad.
Better in the 2nd half at least.
- Mar 27, 2006
- 42,740
- 33,760
- 113
