That's the way you do it, your money for nothin and your chicks for free! Fully participate while not going down the slippery slope of journalistic ridiculitis! I like!
Nebraska sux
- Thread starter BWRhasnoAC
- Start date
For sure. I might click on it later after I'm done contemplating riceville98. OK I'm done!
Don't think about that douche. Blood will squirt out your nose.For sure. I might click on it later after I'm done contemplating riceville98. OK I'm done!
Ouch! That sounds painful.
You could be right. I need to behave now. I have promised not to call him any names.
Yes U R right on the money Nebraska Fans have nothing to cheer about and playing in the B1G makes things even worse, NU football has been BAAADDDD
and will continue to LOSE AS LONG AS THEY REMAIN IN THE B1G...
ENJOY SUCKERS. KEEP BUYING SEASON TICKETS AND LOSING!!!
We can all use a little pity, forgiveness, whatever you want to call it.
Edit: At some point, anyway.
Re: that 2nd paragraph . . .
I think the ideal would be if Nebraska gets a little better but then just stays there at that level forever. Constantly thinking they are on the verge of greatness, never actually attaining it. Going somewhere between 5-7 and 7-5 every year; missing bowl games some years, making minor bowl games other years. Changing coaches every 4 years because that's "not good enough" while paying $$$ to fire coaches. Beating Iowa every 3 years or so to keep the Hawks humble. They might snag a highly rated recruit from the state of Iowa now and then, but not enough to be a threat to our recruiting.
A constant groove of mediocrity - nothing special.
That sounds amazing to me.
He said it was a "shitpost" and satire on his twitter. Anyways, just a dumb article for clicks.
Article was a poor attempt at humor by a hawk fan. I still think Nebraska can turn things around, just not with Frost, and certainly not into a national juggernaut. The resources for the program are there with revenue.
Maybe they can get to where Iowa is with a few 10+ win seasons every 10-12 years.
2 Big 10 schools with really strong runs the last 15 were Michigan State and Wisconsin. Each had 7 10+ win seasons. A really fantastic stretch for both programs. Might have to do with Michigan floundering for a lot of those years though.
Nebraska had a mountain of advantages regionally for decades that are never going to return.
-Everyone else for 500+ miles(and most all the Big 8) was a non factor in the 60's and most of the 70s except for OU. Helped NU get on solid ground as a winning program.
-Nebraska had a revolutionary strength and conditioning program in the 70s moving forward.
-Unlimited scholarships for a long stretch.
-Once established as a top program in the region, they dominated TV appearances in the 70s/80s with fewer networks and games broadcast, furthering their brand.
-Attained strong walk on program as players would get scholarships eventually, instead of playing elsewhere on scholarship.
By the early 2000s TV deals expanded greatly and every program had exposure. Sports supplementation and advanced strength training were a priority for all programs. Scholarship limits in the mid 90s caught up with Nebraska a few years later. Probably some other issues I'm not even thinking about had changed the landscape drastically.
Maybe they can get to where Iowa is with a few 10+ win seasons every 10-12 years.
2 Big 10 schools with really strong runs the last 15 were Michigan State and Wisconsin. Each had 7 10+ win seasons. A really fantastic stretch for both programs. Might have to do with Michigan floundering for a lot of those years though.
Nebraska had a mountain of advantages regionally for decades that are never going to return.
-Everyone else for 500+ miles(and most all the Big 8) was a non factor in the 60's and most of the 70s except for OU. Helped NU get on solid ground as a winning program.
-Nebraska had a revolutionary strength and conditioning program in the 70s moving forward.
-Unlimited scholarships for a long stretch.
-Once established as a top program in the region, they dominated TV appearances in the 70s/80s with fewer networks and games broadcast, furthering their brand.
-Attained strong walk on program as players would get scholarships eventually, instead of playing elsewhere on scholarship.
By the early 2000s TV deals expanded greatly and every program had exposure. Sports supplementation and advanced strength training were a priority for all programs. Scholarship limits in the mid 90s caught up with Nebraska a few years later. Probably some other issues I'm not even thinking about had changed the landscape drastically.
I remember having an argument about 3 years ago stating that Iowa State is now a better football program than Nebraska. May have been borderline close then. Not even close now. That would be a step down right now.
The guys I knew that played for Osbern referred to them as “don’t ask shakes.”
I disagree with the OP. I don't want Campbell for UNL. There are three other coaches at least, in the Big 12, that I would prefer.
You are stuck with ole frosty. They are getting that extension ready now.
Cool.
How many of those do you think Nebraska has a legit shot of landing, should they choose them?
CycloneErik
Well-Known Member
Maybe out of those 3 coaches you want at Nebraska, one could be HC, one could be DC and one could be OC
