I don't completely disagree, just sort ofI can tell you from first hand experience that the message I received from my guidance counselor and financial aid officer was the exact opposite message and it ****** me for a long time. They sat across the desk from me and told me how I wouldn't be anything without a college degree (I was already dead-set on going so that didn't skew my opinion) but (I can still remember this guys face as he tells me this) "This money is practically free. You should take max loans to get a head start on life. Once you graduate you'll make plenty of money to pay it off in no time." Well after 13 years of making student loan payments higher than my rent/mortgage which gave me little to know discretionary income, I finally paid those loans off. So yeah, as someone who fell into that scam, I would agree with their bias.
Another data-point that supports that is the number of kids who get pushed into university and leave after a year or two without a degree. Now they have a larger debt load and no additional perceived value from an employer. Rationale is that for 2/3's of those kids per your example, it may make more sense for them to "test the waters" at a community college for a fraction of the cost. Average dropout rates at 4 year universities in the US is 56%!!! So statistically speaking, the counselor is more likely to be correct in assuming the kid will drop out than not. To be completely fair, the 2 year data looks even worse. However I'm assuming those rates would go down if more kids went the 2 yr route first vs jumping straight to a 4 yr program.
Source: Drop Out Rates
All the more reason the students who finish their degree with high academic achievement should be able to finance their education interest free. The “no handouts” crowd can rest assured they are still paying their own way 100% while others get totally free college from mom and dad, they just aren’t making banks rich in the process of being exceptional students who aren’t at all a big loan risk anyway.