None of those guys have personal relationships with Gary Thompson
maybe gunners grandma will be the coach.
None of those guys have personal relationships with Gary Thompson
ehh...that’s what I thought too. But I think the “he’s not fred” hangover might last longer than one coach. It won’t be as bad. But it’ll be there.
maybe gunners grandma will be the coach.
maybe gunners grandma will be the coach.
They we're allowed to dribble back thenShe was a star in 6 player ball in the 30’s.
It would happen eventually if he doesn’t surpass accomplishments.
but it’s going to take at least 4 full seasons before any questions will arise
She was a star in 6 player ball in the 30’s.
They we're allowed to dribble back then
can you imagine if its like porter moser, or of course tj, after getting everyone excited about the possibility of fred making his triumphant return?
Disagree, the Sangre De Crista mountains have some amazing skiing and snowboarding. When they opened up Taos to snowboards I was like the 10th person in the lift line. I learned to ride big mountains at Angel Fire and Red River.
Cloudcroft in the south is also an amazing place visually.
I wouldnt say its all a wasteland.
I quite enjoyed going to white sands and then driving up to cloudcroft when i visited las cruces (which itself is a nice little college town)
holy **** dude. How can I make this simple so you can figure it out?
Donors will pony up buyout for FRED. Just Fred, no one else, it’s not a blank check to the AD. It’s to buy out Fred. If that money is not used to buyout Fred, then that money doesn’t exist. Make sense?
I don’t believe anyone that can’t figure out how to quote-reply properly.
Yep it's easy peasy.
Where the hell am I? With all the crazy talk on here I swear I went to CF and it redirected me to some crazy conspiracy theory website.
What says Hoiberg returning for part deux is going work?
The market inefficiency of transfers isn’t what it used to be and was beginning to lose its power in the twilight of Hoiberg’s last ISU stint.
The formula for success (transfers, free flowing offense that captitalizes on the easy transition pts) simply isn’t as powerful as it used to be.....which is a model Prohm has tried to emulate without much subsequent reinvention. Lack of success at NU doesn’t really provide evidence that Hoiberg et al. are coaching above their weight either. Heck Tim Miles certainly did more in 2 years at NU than Hoiberg has.
Other than blind nostalgia stoking the flames of a former, I don’t understand the appeal. Seems like fansite delusion.
What says Hoiberg returning for part deux is going work?
The market inefficiency of transfers isn’t what it used to be and was beginning to lose its power in the twilight of Hoiberg’s last ISU stint.
The formula for success (transfers, free flowing offense that captitalizes on the easy transition pts) simply isn’t as powerful as it used to be.....which is a model Prohm has tried to emulate without much subsequent reinvention. Lack of success at NU provides evidence that Hoiberg et al. are not coaching above their weight either. Heck Tim Miles certainly did more in 2 years at NU than Hoiberg has.
Other than blind nostalgia stoking the flames of a former, I don’t understand the appeal. Seems like fansite delusion.
What says Hoiberg returning for part deux is going work?
The market inefficiency of transfers isn’t what it used to be and was beginning to lose its power in the twilight of Hoiberg’s last ISU stint.
The formula for success (transfers, free flowing offense that captitalizes on the easy transition pts) simply isn’t as powerful as it used to be.....which is a model Prohm has tried to emulate without much subsequent reinvention. Lack of success at NU provides evidence that Hoiberg et al. are not coaching above their weight either. Heck Tim Miles certainly did more in 2 years at NU than Hoiberg has.
Other than blind nostalgia stoking the flames of a former, I don’t understand the appeal. Seems like fansite delusion.