End of January Update Coach Prohm

What to do with Coach Prohm

  • Fire Prohm now

    Votes: 77 19.8%
  • Fire Prohm at the end of the year

    Votes: 251 64.7%
  • Give Prohm one more year

    Votes: 52 13.4%
  • Prohm is doing a good job

    Votes: 8 2.1%

  • Total voters
    388
I get that, I just can't shake the feeling that most of his accomplishments are overblown because we already know his name. If John Doe had the same resume, except he was an assistant at Oregon instead of ISU, I don't think we would be looking at him.
Look at the other resumes we are talking about. They aren’t any better.
 
TJ shouldn’t be brought in because he is TJ. He should be brought in because he has a good resume. This is his 5th year as a HC. His previous 4 years all looked really good. He also has other key factors such as recruiting connections to the Midwest and P5 assistant experience.

Certain people refuse to consider him because of his connections to Iowa State. That is the same principle that you are complaining about. His resume should stand independent of his previous experience at Iowa State. He likely is a finalist if you do that.
Just admit you want lolTJ because you’re nostalgic about the Hoiberg years. That’s the only reason anyone wants lolTJ. And that’s a terrible reason to hire a head coach. Get over it. Move on.
 
Here is a good way to know if your coach is doing a good job: Would the team win more, fewer, or an equal number of games without him as the coach? We certainly wouldn’t lose any fewer games if we didn’t have a freaking coach. You could argue that we would have more wins.
But who would call timeouts?????
 
Lol seriously?
Yeah. I would be fine with DeVries or Smith as hires too. I’m not locked in as TJ is the only option. I think he is the best but that’s different. I don’t think DeVries will be interested and I think TJ has a better resume than Smith.

Other names are Medved who I don’t like for how he handled Drake. Some of the previous P5 coaches are too expensive to be clearly better. Who clearly is a better option?
 
Just admit you want lolTJ because you’re nostalgic about the Hoiberg years. That’s the only reason anyone wants lolTJ. And that’s a terrible reason to hire a head coach. Get over it. Move on.

Who are you top 5 potential replacements?
 
Yeah. I would be fine with DeVries or Smith as hires too. I’m not locked in as TJ is the only option. I think he is the best but that’s different. I don’t think DeVries will be interested and I think TJ has a better resume than Smith.

Other names are Medved who I don’t like for how he handled Drake. Some of the previous P5 coaches are too expensive to be clearly better. Who clearly is a better option?

Throwing these out:

Scott Nagy
Travis Ford
 
Throwing these out:

Scott Nagy
Travis Ford
Scott Nagy would be a decent option. I’d have concerns about his lack of real P5 experience but I think he’d be a decent choice. Travis Ford I guess I don’t get what he got that was unfair at OSU. I never was impressed with him.
 
Yeah. I would be fine with DeVries or Smith as hires too. I’m not locked in as TJ is the only option. I think he is the best but that’s different. I don’t think DeVries will be interested and I think TJ has a better resume than Smith.

Other names are Medved who I don’t like for how he handled Drake. Some of the previous P5 coaches are too expensive to be clearly better. Who clearly is a better option?

Medved lol.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: mynameisjonas
Scott Nagy would be a decent option. I’d have concerns about his lack of real P5 experience but I think he’d be a decent choice. Travis Ford I guess I don’t get what he got that was unfair at OSU. I never was impressed with him.

Well out of 8 seasons only 2 were bad.....so I guess "unfair" is in the eye of the beholder. He does however have experience in this conference, and knows what type of player to recruit and was a good recruiter in Stillwater. Does any of that mean it would translate to W's up here...who knows. Even in his good years.....he didn't exactly tear the conference up. He knows the environment however and has heading coaching experience in it, so for me that's a plus.
 
Lol if we had a good coach who brought in NBA caliber players, we wouldn’t be losing by nearly 40.

IMO Prohm's failing hasn't been his inability to bring in NBA caliber recruits. It is his inability to sign the next tier of player. And keep them at ISU for 4 years. Personally, I would rather have a roster full of guys who at best end up being overseas professional players. I will take program foundational players like Vroman, Homan, Sullivan, Stinson, Clarke, Gilstrap, Garrett, Ejim, Kane, Hogue, etc. over NBA caliber players.

It is a fine line, because every good HS player has a dream to play in the NBA. But not every player has the patience or work ethic to develop into a solid college player before making the NBA jump.

Prohm has done a great job of attracting top HS talent like: Wigginton, Horton Tucker, Foster & Hunter (I excluded Halliburton because his development into an NBA player within 2 years was a freak occurrance). Where he has struggled is to bring in 3 & 4 star recruits that develop into very good college players and stick around 3-4 years.

For ISU to be a perennial NCAA Tournament team we need those foundational players and then kids like Wigginton, Horton-Tucker, Foster and Hunter can be sprinkled in. If they are ready for a big role from day 1- awesome. If they need so time to develop- then they can fit a valuable role. IMO guys like Morris and Halliburton benefited from such roles.
 
Im in my 40s and want 90% focus on football 5% on MBB and 5% on the rest. Football drives the whole AD. A good football team will allow you to hire better basketball coaches, get better basketball facilities and such. A good basketball team doesn't get you much other than a good basketball team we've seen.

Fortunately the goal is to have Bowl playing football teams and NCAA Tournament basketball teams. It sucks having a horrible team in either sport. It was miserable to walk out of Jack Trice in the latter McCarney and Rhoads years. And it was miserable to walk out of Hilton the last few years under Prohm.

As others have mentioned for those of us in our 40's and 50's ISU basketball has a special place in our hearts because MBB was special when we were undergrads and it still holds that place in our hearts. That is why the last couple years of losing regularly in Hilton is painful.

As tough as the McDermott years were, I always felt we had talent and were competitive against 80% of the Big12. The last 2 years under Prohm, being competitive is a surprise.
 
Fortunately the goal is to have Bowl playing football teams and NCAA Tournament basketball teams. It sucks having a horrible team in either sport. It was miserable to walk out of Jack Trice in the latter McCarney and Rhoads years. And it was miserable to walk out of Hilton the last few years under Prohm.

As others have mentioned for those of us in our 40's and 50's ISU basketball has a special place in our hearts because MBB was special when we were undergrads and it still holds that place in our hearts. That is why the last couple years of losing regularly in Hilton is painful.

As tough as the McDermott years were, I always felt we had talent and were competitive against 80% of the Big12. The last 2 years under Prohm, being competitive is a surprise.
Basketball was special because we were terrible at football. We considered ourselves a BB school. What did that get us though? It almost got us the mountain west. I don’t want the mountain west. I want a good basketball team but realize that if I gotta pick which to put more focus on, it has to be football
 
  • Agree
Reactions: UNIclonefan
Basketball was special because we were terrible at football. We considered ourselves a BB school. What did that get us though? It almost got us the mountain west. I don’t want the mountain west. I want a good basketball team but realize that if I gotta pick which to put more focus on, it has to be football

So we've gone from throwing in the towel on the coach to throwing in the towel on the sport? Just checking.
 
So we've gone from throwing in the towel on the coach to throwing in the towel on the sport? Just checking.
Nope. There was talk about people in their 40s would take a good basketball team over a good football team. I’m in my 40s and was saying why I would take a good football team over a good basketball team if push came to shove.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Land Grant
IMO Prohm's failing hasn't been his inability to bring in NBA caliber recruits. It is his inability to sign the next tier of player. And keep them at ISU for 4 years. Personally, I would rather have a roster full of guys who at best end up being overseas professional players. I will take program foundational players like Vroman, Homan, Sullivan, Stinson, Clarke, Gilstrap, Garrett, Ejim, Kane, Hogue, etc. over NBA caliber players.

It is a fine line, because every good HS player has a dream to play in the NBA. But not every player has the patience or work ethic to develop into a solid college player before making the NBA jump.

Prohm has done a great job of attracting top HS talent like: Wigginton, Horton Tucker, Foster & Hunter (I excluded Halliburton because his development into an NBA player within 2 years was a freak occurrance). Where he has struggled is to bring in 3 & 4 star recruits that develop into very good college players and stick around 3-4 years.

For ISU to be a perennial NCAA Tournament team we need those foundational players and then kids like Wigginton, Horton-Tucker, Foster and Hunter can be sprinkled in. If they are ready for a big role from day 1- awesome. If they need so time to develop- then they can fit a valuable role. IMO guys like Morris and Halliburton benefited from such roles.

His downfall is that he tries to play an offensive game that relies on having at least two solid 3p shooters but has only gotten one in his entire tenure here and his defensive strategy ******* sucks. If in fact he has a strategy. You don’t kill a guy for bringing in the best talent he can get.
 
Success is absolutely tough to sustain. We are probably at a juncture where a change is needed. Still been a wonky year with the Covid stuff which still has had an impact to some extent. Although there is a body of work that can be judged/scrutinized for the last few years. It doesn't seem that we repleneished very well this year contributing to our regression. I like Prohm a lot and I would venture to guess he will have success when/if he moves on this year or next. It has been tough to watch though and some changes are probably in order.

I sense that any responses will be from people that don’t know who you are.