Blocked FG

The kid that blocked it came in over the C gap between the right guard and tackle, TT had 3 guys in the gap, the first guy hit the tackle low, the guy that blocked the kick dove over the pile in the C gap. His left hand is on the right guard if ISU, its hard to tell whether he pushed off the lower TT player and then slide down to the back of the ISU tackle or not, but after watching it 10 times in slow motion, I think he did push off his own player and then slide his hand down to the ISU tackle.
Without a doubt the kick was low, but it all happened so fast it would be hard for the refs to see it and call it illegal as the TT player was diving over the line.

This is possible, but looking at it from different angles in slow motion none of this is clearly visible, so you can’t throw a flag.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: khardbored
The TT defender did use leverage from his teammate which is illegal. Those of you who are saying our linemen have been taught to just bend over.. that’s just not even close to being true. The long snapper can’t be lined up over or touched once the ball is snapped if he keeps his head down..which is why it looks like our linemen just bend over. Lastly..it was a very low kick so everything else I just mentioned prolly wouldn’t have mattered anyways as it could have been blocked at the line without any penetration.
I have always thought that every fg kick seems low this year. My high school kid kicks it higher earlier than ISU does. Maybe a slight exaggeration, but I'm sticking with it.
 
For kicks that short I would think we should just be popping the ball up in the air since it doesn't have to be a long driving kick. In this instance the potential penalty would not be an issue.
 
You realize that you’re suggesting that refs have to see something to throw a flag?
Should? Yes. Have to/Do? I think we know the answer to that. Ask Julian Good-Jones @ K State.
 
On the blocked FG attempt, ISU’s offensive linemen stay hunched down after the snap. This allowed the TT player to push off the ISU linemen’s back, elevate in the air, and block the kick. After the ensuing ISU TD, the ISU offensive linemen rise up after the snap and blocked the TT players. Hence, the TT players could not push off the linemen’s backs to elevate and block the PAT.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: LarryISU
Why don’t they just move the holder and the kicker back 5 yards on these closer kicks?
Besides messing with snap consistency, it would allow the defense free runners at the holder from the edge. The seven yard spacing is designed to force free runners to angle around wing blockers, and assumes the front seven can hold their lines. This is why you never see the wing blockers move, the angle is theoretically covered. If they did move, they'd allow a free runner from a favorable angle for the defense.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Gunnerclone
On the blocked FG attempt, ISU’s offensive linemen stay hunched down after the snap. This allowed the TT player to push off the ISU linemen’s back, elevate in the air, and block the kick. After the ensuing ISU TD, the ISU offensive linemen rise up after the snap and blocked the TT players. Hence, the TT players could not push off the linemen’s backs to elevate and block the PAT.

Thank you! Finally, someone else described exactly what actually happened, as I did in post #4. I actually went back to the replay this morning and took a photo with my phone of the Texas Tech player reaching over and putting his right hand on our right guard's butt and his left hand on our right tackle's butt and then leaping through the gap between them as our two guys just stood there hunched over and didn't move, which is obviously the technique they were taught. I can't figure out how to share it here or I would.

And as Jayshellberg noted, we corrected our blocking the rest of the game and our linemen stood up so as to prevent any Tech players from repeating how the blocked field goal happened.
 
Thank you! Finally, someone else described exactly what actually happened, as I did in post #4. I actually went back to the replay this morning and took a photo with my phone of the Texas Tech player reaching over and putting his right hand on our right guard's butt and his left hand on our right tackle's butt and then leaping through the gap between them as our two guys just stood there hunched over and didn't move, which is obviously the technique they were taught. I can't figure out how to share it here or I would.

And as Jayshellberg noted, we corrected our blocking the rest of the game and our linemen stood up so as to prevent any Tech players from repeating how the blocked field goal happened.
Do we expect to see a dedicated special teams coach for next season.
ISU.png
WHO teaches this line man blocking for FG protection? Line up. Hold your stance. Head down. Close your eyes. TT did a good job scouting.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: BigD and LarryISU
Thank you! Finally, someone else described exactly what actually happened, as I did in post #4. I actually went back to the replay this morning and took a photo with my phone of the Texas Tech player reaching over and putting his right hand on our right guard's butt and his left hand on our right tackle's butt and then leaping through the gap between them as our two guys just stood there hunched over and didn't move, which is obviously the technique they were taught. I can't figure out how to share it here or I would.

And as Jayshellberg noted, we corrected our blocking the rest of the game and our linemen stood up so as to prevent any Tech players from repeating how the blocked field goal happened.

If we “corrected” our blocking the rest of the game it does not seem logical that we were taught to do it the initial way. I don’t think the coaches had this sudden flash during the game and decided to implement a new technique on the spot. I’m guessing we just failed to execute combined with a little TT luck.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 83cy
The TT defender did use leverage from his teammate which is illegal. Those of you who are saying our linemen have been taught to just bend over.. that’s just not even close to being true. The long snapper can’t be lined up over or touched once the ball is snapped if he keeps his head down..which is why it looks like our linemen just bend over. Lastly..it was a very low kick so everything else I just mentioned prolly wouldn’t have mattered anyways as it could have been blocked at the line without any penetration.

Honest question I thought in college you could line up over the snapper? I remember Suh when he played at Nebraska just trucking our snapper to block extra points something like twice in one game.
 
Just a freak play combined with some marginal blocking and a low kick. All in all it was just a traditional ISU type play.
 
Honest question I thought in college you could line up over the snapper?

Player safety, I don't recall the exact rule now, but I do know they have a rule that protects the snapper now. On this play, TTU had no one across from our center.
 
Player safety, I don't recall the exact rule now, but I do know they have a rule that protects the snapper now. On this play, TTU had no one across from our center.

I wasn't doubting anybody I just still have nightmares about Suh. Thanks