All three TEs are listed as OR....
Didn't make sense to me when one is an All-American.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All three TEs are listed as OR....
height is one thing we have definitely gone after recently and it is awesome.We can go 12 personal in the red-zone with two 6'6" TE's plus Sean Shaw who is 6'6" and Xavier Hutchinson at 6'3". That is a lot of size and skill for cb's to cover. Louisiana has 2 starters in the defensive backfield that are listed at 5'9"
13 personal you can add a 6'7" Soehner to have 4 guys at or above 6'6"
The problem with #FreeMikeRose is that freshman year Mike Rose had Willie Harvey and Marcel Spears to be in between. The defense is weaker with Rose in the middle because of who his replacement would be (and because Vance is a baller in his own right).I appreciate that you are also on Team #FreeMikeRose.
We’re just a more solid defense with him in the middle. That sucks for Vance, but it is what it is. I’ll take less sacks and pressure for better coverage and organization in the middle.
Also another note: I really hope TJ Tampa works out at CB. Great size there.
Pactically, Easton will receive the least snaps of the three, so I get you. But maybe the "OR" says more about him than it does Charlie. We all remember how Campbell hyped him up last year.Didn't make sense to me when one is an All-American.
I think people are looking too much into the “ors” especially in the o-line. The offensive line come Saturday will be the players listed first on the depth chart. imo
The lineup I saw suggested back in the Spring—apparently filtering from the coaching staff—was simply Vance to Will and Hummel sliding to Sam. So, where’s the weak spot with Rose at Mike?The problem with #FreeMikeRose is that freshman year Mike Rose had Willie Harvey and Marcel Spears to be in between. The defense is weaker with Rose in the middle because of who his replacement would be (and because Vance is a baller in his own right).
I’m not sure about this.I think people are looking too much into the “ors” especially in the o-line. The offensive line come Saturday will be the players listed first on the depth chart. imo
I’m not sure about this.
I suspect that Grant Treiber is the long term solution at LT. If you start Sean Foster there against Louisiana for his collection of starts and senior status, and as a reward for working hard—both of which would be a very Matt Campbell thing to do—then where do you give Grant his first start?
On the road against TCU doesn’t seem great, nor does at home against OU. I think that CMC is going to have a tough decision on that one.
Matt Campbell doesn’t coach basketball.As with basketball.... it doesn't really matter who starts.... it matters who plays the most minutes. Foster could start, but then Treiber gets the majority of minutes.
I’m not sure about this.
I suspect that Grant Treiber is the long term solution at LT. If you start Sean Foster there against Louisiana for his collection of starts and senior status, and as a reward for working hard—both of which would be a very Matt Campbell thing to do—then where do you give Grant his first start?
On the road against TCU doesn’t seem great, nor does at home against OU. I think that CMC is going to have a tough decision on that one.
If it was originally the staff's idea, there must be a reason it's not being implemented. Perhaps Vance is even less natural than Rose on the outside, I wouldn't know.The lineup I saw suggested back in the Spring—apparently filtering from the coaching staff—was simply Vance to Will and Hummel sliding to Sam. So, where’s the weak spot with Rose at Mike?
If it was originally the staff's idea, there must be a reason it's not being implemented. Perhaps Vance is even less natural than Rose on the outside, I wouldn't know.
In any case, I don't feel like linebacking was the issue last year. Getting a pass rush, and the pass coverage of the safeties seemed the worst. It also didn't help the linebackers that the corners were bad at setting the edge. I'm still worried about the secondary, hoping that another year of experience and a healthy Jaquan Bailey does the trick.
.
Always thought he had it in him beast mode!Uwazurike 6'6" 310 lbs!!!! NICE!
Daniel Jackson (6-2, 210, Fr.) , this one is a little surprising to me. Hadn't heard a lot about him, but then again, this year we have not heard a lot period.