New Bracketology

Statefan10

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 20, 2019
19,975
24,807
113
That’s funny because he is saying the same thing I am. Uni is going to be in NCAA tourney and is here to stay but because it came from him instead of me you all will agree
Wait I'm so confused.. Wasn't it you who said all of that?
 

IASTATE07

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 30, 2016
12,017
18,794
113
That’s funny because he is saying the same thing I am. Uni is going to be in NCAA tourney and is here to stay but because it came from him instead of me you all will agree

What happened in the West Virginia game?
 

Statefan10

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 20, 2019
19,975
24,807
113
Uni lost because of an outrageous call in the last minute of play
The call was correct though right? You can't undercut someone that has left the ground, regardless of intent?

You can argue whether or not their should be that rule in CBB but I think by the book it was the correct call at the time.
 

HawkJRP

Well-Known Member
Dec 27, 2019
1,486
784
48
38
UNI fans are the worst. This thread is a big reminder why I was so happy when the home and home was cancelled with them and the Big 4 emerged.
 
  • Useful
Reactions: UNI1ISU2

Statefan10

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 20, 2019
19,975
24,807
113
He fell backwards. He slipped. It was not intentional. It’s a play on on a rebound like that
If you read what I said, I believe there does not have to be intent involved. No different than accidentally poking someone in the eye. Regardless of whether or not you meant to do it, that's the call. It's a player safety rule.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: UNI1ISU2

UNI1ISU2

Well-Known Member
Jun 7, 2019
1,084
177
83
If you read what I said, I believe there does not have to be intent involved. No different than accidentally poking someone in the eye. Regardless of whether or not you meant to do it, that's the call. It's a player safety rule.
Even if so it was called a intentional 1. 2 shots and the ball. A common foul would of been the right call IF it was even a foul
 

1UNI2ISU

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2013
7,017
8,926
113
Waterloo
Well they are hawk fans too, so I agree.

giphy.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: JP4CY

Statefan10

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 20, 2019
19,975
24,807
113
Even if so it was called a intentional 1. 2 shots and the ball. A common foul would of been the right call IF it was even a foul
He unintentionally undercut a player.. That's 100% a foul. You don't have to foul someone on purpose for it to be called a foul.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron