Haliburton is an absolute stud. He's the only complete player on this roster.
Bolton and Nixon are useful in certain situations but limited/flawed in essentially opposite ways. The good news is, Nixon's limitations on offense but strength of defense covers up for the opposite of Bolton (and vice versa). You can work with that.
Jacobson, Young, and Conditt are all effective big men with different emphases, though Conditt is emerging as clearly the best of the three of them.
The other guys... sorry, but they are not Big 12 players right now.
So that equals six guys... That is not enough? What is the problem?
The problem emerges --
All the guys above are either a 1, 2, or a 5.
The guys we have playing 3 and 4 are not suited for that in the modern game, and they either are not producing much on offense playing those positions and/or they are getting hosed on defense while doing it. We are trying to shoehorn the six above into awkward lineups and/or not playing a style that would really bring out the strengths that we have.
This is why I say there is talent there, but nothing fits together. Having Horton-Tucker back, in particular, would have changed everything...
Haliburton
Bolton
Nixon
Horton-Tucker
Conditt
...that lineup is not winning the Big 12, but I would take its chances to make it to 9-9 in the conference and the NCAA tournament way more than our current.