You said the expectations going into last year were too low for ISU because people didn't realize how good Jacobson and Shayok were.
They were 8 and 6 ppg guys at their previous stops. Not sure why anyone would've expected Shayok or Jacobson to do what they did last year, because there wasn't really an indication they were those types of players.
People keep saying we shouldn't judge last season vs. preseason expectations because they were too low. Why would the expectations have been higher than a 6 seed? You had two injury prone role players in NWB and Young alongside two talented but wildly inconsistent freshman (LW and Lard) returning from a really bad team. Then you are adding in a freshman ranked about 50-ish in THT (ranked similarly to Matt Thomas, who struggled mightily as a freshman), a role player from a good team (Shayok) and a role player from a bad team (MJ). Then you have two freshmen that are decently ranked in Conditt and Griffin, and one low-ranked Freshman in Haliburton.
My problem is in the same thread we can have people claiming Prohm horribly mismanaged Wigginton, who's probably going to be a G-League/overseas lifer that was an efficient scorer and conf. 6th man of the year as a soph. while giving Prohm no credit for having Shayok go from an 8 ppg role player to an All-American. Or having MJ go from a 6 and 5 kind of role player to a double-digit scorer that was huge in the big 12 tournament.