No, I refuse to be illogical. Out of bounds plays have multiple actions on them. Maryal May have chosen to cut to the path of least resistance to make sure he could catch the ball, but to say that it was specifically drawn up that way isn’t based in fact.
Even Fred, gasp the greatest out of bounds play caller ever, had multiple actions on OOB plays.[/QUO
You have a vey small life if you spend time diagraming 1 play over the thousands and thousands and thousands of plays throughout the season and calling it evidence to support whatever position you have today.
So, let me see what you guys are saying.
1.) It is impossible to want the coach to stay due to successes and be critical of some of our team problems. If we are critical then we are part of an underground 'crew' of Fred worshopers who want Prohm gone.
2.). You can't criticize or blame terrible offensive sets on the coach. It is 100% the fault of the players for not executing. Nice of you to support our players.....
3.). If we do criticize the coach, we need to provide specific examples in addition to providing specific sets we would run differently. This is so you can tell us we don't know what we are saying since we aren't D1 coaches. Gotcha, so if you hold yourself to your own values it means that your support is worthless since you don't know **** about D1 bball either.
4.). If we provide specific examples of bad sets, then we need to prove it by drawing a specific map of what went wrong for each player. If something did go wrong then it wasn't on the coach (because as I mentioned in 2 above it's always the players who don't execute) and we have no life because we tried to prove your wrong and it doesn't matter (because of #3 above where we aren't D1 coaches anyway)
Does that about cover it?