Glad we have Lester going tomorrow, and can throw Hamels on Thursday if we win, Hendricks Friday, and Lester again in Game 3 at home. Obviously have to win tomorrow, but I like our chances in a 5 game series if we do.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What is the point of the regular season then?
This is a lie and a myth that MLB wants you to believe. If all 162 matter there would be no one game playoff. The Cubs won the head to head, Cubs had a better division record, Cubs and Brewers ended with same record against NL and AL. If all 162 matter then Cubs hold two tie breaks and are tied in the other 2 categories. This means there is no 1 game playoff after 162 Cubs showed they were the better team.
To get to the playoffs?
Agree, but guess those other 19 games wasn't enough to prove anything.My point is the regular season should matter. If they have the same record but one team has more wins head to head, that team should win the tiebreaker. There shouldn't be an extra game. That's just dumb.
I dont think its stupid at all. Should be playing your best ball at the end of the season.
My point is the regular season should matter. If they have the same record but one team has more wins head to head, that team should win the tiebreaker. There shouldn't be an extra game. That's just dumb.
I wouldn't mind hearing an answer to the question asked though. I won't throw the language in there though and I will ask it. Why does MLB not take into account any of the regular season Head to head to determine a tie breaker? It just seems ridiculous that you play all of these games during the regular season, but then the tie breaker is having to play another game against a team you already beat head to head during the season. I mean, even with today's loss, the Cubs still won more games against Milwaukee during the season, right?
In the end, I don't really care, but it seems to take away all emphasis for playing 162 games during the regular season. So I am genuinely curious if MLB has any real reasoning for not having a basic head to head record as a tiebreaker. I mean I get it, from back in the old days when you didn't have a wild card, but it seems to take a lot of importance away from the regular season now that a basic tiebreaker rule wouldn't necessarily keep you out of the post season.
Strike out. Top the ball off for a weak grounder. Pop ups. Backward K's. The Brewers see a strike and they f3##ing drive it. The Cubs just watch it go by and swing at crap. Great hitting approach Cubbies.
Even if they win tomorrow, the odds of them jumping out on the Brewers early in games is slim they way each team has been playing. What a disaster of a season.
Agree, and if I am not mistaken, it used to be head to head but they changed it at some point. And if I am not mistaken if two division winners have the same record, head to head is used to determine which team has the higher seed .
95 win disaster?
Sure, Chili probably has to go, but a disaster? You guys are weird.
Yeah, they choked away the Central, they have no bullpen, and they can't score runs on a consistent basis. Flipping disaster.
Yeah, they choked away the Central, they have no bullpen, and they can't score runs on a consistent basis. Flipping disaster.
95 win disaster?
Sure, Chili probably has to go, but a disaster? You guys are weird.