NDSU BISON @ Iowa State University Cyclones

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't think I've ever met more fans from another team that argue and debate who are returning starters and who are backups, more than NDSU fans. Rather entertaining to say the least.
The person I talked to didn't debate any of it. He's been going to games for 35 years and said this is the most turnover at all levels he can remember. He thought one of the factors for Bohl's leaving was the turnover coming this season.
 
You are delusional. If you are going to trust a "bison" fan, that does not realize their starting TE from last year has not graduated, that's your choice. Did you like him because he gave you hope and misinformation? There are real bison fans I would listen to that actually know there stuff on here, not some guy who has no idea who is returning and who isn't.

Also, our safeties haven't been tested by talent like Iowa State's? Have you heard of Tyler Lockett? He was pretty good, and we did not shut him down, but don't say they haven't been tested or imply they haven't seen anyone of your caliber receivers.

Crockett did rush for over 1,000 yards last year, some backup lol. But no I have never called him a returning starter because you are right he was a backup. Running back with a 1,000 yard rusher back is not a concern- the O line and new QB are the question marks, as well as the interior d line. Do you believe him that you will win by 2td's?
I absolutely believe we win by at least two touchdowns, I said 17-20 points so I think he is low.
 
The person I talked to didn't debate any of it. He's been going to games for 35 years and said this is the most turnover at all levels he can remember. He thought one of the factors for Bohl's leaving was the turnover coming this season.
I realize your source didn't debate any of it, it's the 3-4 NDSU fans we have on here that seem to debate it quite a bit. (i.e. see the posts immediately following your original comment)
 
Ok, Well from what I know he can be an every down back. Still don't see them going over 70% of carries. The reason it may increase is because Chase Morlock had minor meniscus surgery but it is said that he will play at ISU. Also King Frazier being a soph transfer bringing him along and will see how well he picks up the play book and offense and stuff. So probably may see 75% of carries for Crockett in opener and that wouldn't surprise me.

NFL Draft Diamonds and @FCSSCOUT said earlier that Johnson from UNI and Crockett are top 2 FCS backs on NFL radar. Said it's basically a 1A and 1B type thing where both are very good and clearly above anyone else. Zenner drops cause NDSU makes him look so bad I think so they don't figure if he can run on them then he can't run at next level? I am not sure why he isn't really talked about. Good back, just NDSU run defense has been so dang good.

I think you meant 1AA and 1AAb.
 
I realize your source didn't debate any of it, it's the 3-4 NDSU fans we have on here that seem to debate it quite a bit. (i.e. see the posts immediately following your original comment)
Oh I know what you meant. Got more out of a 20 minute conversation about the game with him than any of the Bison fans on here!
 
Your posts show there is some sanity in the Bison fanbase. Too bad the rest of the idiots aren't realistic like you are. You are welcome at Fanatic anytime.

Thanks, its unfortunate that a few can destroy it for so many. Trust me about this though, 99.5% of NDSU fans are fantastic people who would give you the shirts off their backs literally.
 
7 returning starters or 7 returning players that have started a game? Because you fail to realize they're two different things.

I realize your source didn't debate any of it, it's the 3-4 NDSU fans we have on here that seem to debate it quite a bit. (i.e. see the posts immediately following your original comment)

We talk about the starters so much because your fans keep asking how many we have returning, like the first quote questioning do we actually have 7 returning starters on D? Yes. So the conversation is driven by your fanbase, but I will admit the answers from Bison fans haven't been consistent, which is disappointing since it is a simple question.
 
Oh I know what you meant. Got more out of a 20 minute conversation about the game with him than any of the Bison fans on here!

So you are totally ok with him giving you false information, but are not ok with (most) Bison fans on here who present facts? So are you like Cyclone lakes, only information is true if it benefits your side?
 
We talk about the starters so much because your fans keep asking how many we have returning, like the first quote questioning do we actually have 7 returning starters on D? Yes. So the conversation is driven by your fanbase, but I will admit the answers from Bison fans haven't been consistent, which is disappointing since it is a simple question.

I think part of the problem is people skewing what a returning starter is. Just because someone made spot starts due to injuries or suspensions doesn't make them a returning starter.
 
I think part of the problem is people skewing what a returning starter is. Just because someone made spot starts due to injuries or suspensions doesn't make them a returning starter.


What I have tried to say is there are 7 returning starters from last season. There are 2 on the DL that will be NEW full time starters this season but they have started in the past and have lots of experience. If that confused a few or I didn't say it properly and caused some confusion that for that I apologize. Since I got on here to post, I have only tried to help your fans understand who we have at what positions. What NDSU wants to do and what would need to happen to make it possible for them to win. I wish Lakes would help us all out and calm down a lot though.
 
So you are totally ok with him giving you false information, but are not ok with (most) Bison fans on here who present facts? So are you like Cyclone lakes, only information is true if it benefits your side?
False? I may have misheard him on the TE. Honestly I lost count of the names and players that graduated and who had seen some playing time, it is really insane how confident you guys are with the team taking a complete 180 from players to coaches. He is a huge fan but knows this year has a ton of unknowns. But I guess you guys just think winning 3 FCS titles entitles you to something.
 
We talk about the starters so much because your fans keep asking how many we have returning, like the first quote questioning do we actually have 7 returning starters on D? Yes. So the conversation is driven by your fanbase, but I will admit the answers from Bison fans haven't been consistent, which is disappointing since it is a simple question.
Yes and Yes.
 
I think the discussion we should be having about your secondary is more along the lines of your Tampa 2 vs a 3 wide set with a very good pass catching TE. If you are going to have 2 deep safeties, and a MLB roaming the middle zone that means your other two LBs will have to cover a slot receiver (West, Lazard, or Daley) and Bibbs. That leaves 6 guys to block 4 and hopefully all day to throw.
 
False? I may have misheard him on the TE. Honestly I lost count of the names and players that graduated and who had seen some playing time, it is really insane how confident you guys are with the team taking a complete 180 from players to coaches. He is a huge fan but knows this year has a ton of unknowns. But I guess you guys just think winning 3 FCS titles entitles you to something.

You are calling us insanely confident, but yet most of us are predicting low scoring, 3 point Bison wins. You are predicting a 17 point Iowa State win, from a team that has just as many question marks, and did not do nearly as well as us last year. Yeah, we are the insanely confident ones. The other people on here are much more realistic than you are, but that's probably because they don't have UNI in their title.
 
I think the discussion we should be having about your secondary is more along the lines of your Tampa 2 vs a 3 wide set with a very good pass catching TE. If you are going to have 2 deep safeties, and a MLB roaming the middle zone that means your other two LBs will have to cover a slot receiver (West, Lazard, or Daley) and Bibbs. That leaves 6 guys to block 4 and hopefully all day to throw.

If your base offense is more of a 3 wide receiver set PLUS Bibbs, you will be seeing a lot less of Esley Thorton, our SLB, and more of a nickel DB - Board, Colvin, or Dempsey. A couple of the teams we played in the playoffs last year were spread offenses, with 3 and 4 wr sets, and we would just use our fastest two LB's on the field plus a nickel, while our run stopper, who isn't as good in coverage, didn't play as much. If we are counting on Thorton to be covering a WR or your TE, we are in trouble. I don't think that's how this will play out though. Our other two LB's we start- Beck and Littlejohn, are undersized but excel in pass coverage.
 
If your base offense is more of a 3 wide receiver set PLUS Bibbs, you will be seeing a lot less of Esley Thorton, our SLB, and more of a nickel DB - Board, Colvin, or Dempsey. A couple of the teams we played in the playoffs last year were spread offenses, with 3 and 4 wr sets, and we would just use our fastest two LB's on the field plus a nickel, while our run stopper, who isn't as good in coverage, didn't play as much. If we are counting on Thorton to be covering a WR or your TE, we are in trouble. I don't think that's how this will play out though. Our other two LB's we start- Beck and Littlejohn, are undersized but excel in pass coverage.
I think our base offense will be a 3 wide set this year. I think Mangino will use it similar to Fred using Georges, if you bring on the nickel we will run the ball if Thorton stays on the field we will throw. Don't forget though in a true Tampa 2 your MLB is running a middle middle zone. If he has to drop deeper into coverage that will open a lot of crossing routes and slipping backs out of the backfield.
 
If your base offense is more of a 3 wide receiver set PLUS Bibbs, you will be seeing a lot less of Esley Thorton, our SLB, and more of a nickel DB - Board, Colvin, or Dempsey. A couple of the teams we played in the playoffs last year were spread offenses, with 3 and 4 wr sets, and we would just use our fastest two LB's on the field plus a nickel, while our run stopper, who isn't as good in coverage, didn't play as much. If we are counting on Thorton to be covering a WR or your TE, we are in trouble. I don't think that's how this will play out though. Our other two LB's we start- Beck and Littlejohn, are undersized but excel in pass coverage.


Also curious to see how they will use Bo Liekhus. 6' 207 converted DB to LB.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.