Jack Trice throw backs

WalkingCY

Well-Known Member
Sep 26, 2008
6,895
2,592
113
Kansas City
I love them except for the big white numbers on the front.

Agree. Why couldn't they have just put the front #'s on one side of the chest? (above the heart could be the I-State logo and on the other side the jersey # with the nike swoosh under it.) Then obviously have large #'s on the back.

I think the socks are BA
 
Last edited:

klamath632

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2011
12,430
323
83
For this game, they need to replace the "ALL IN" sticker above the facemask with an "I WILL" sticker.

isubeatle, make it happen.
 

cyclone87

Well-Known Member
Apr 6, 2011
3,318
1,540
113
Ames, IA
Agree. Why couldn't they have just put the front #'s on one side of the chest? (above the heart could be the I-State logo and on the other side the jersey # with the nike swoosh under it.) Then obviously have large #'s on the back.

I think the socks are BA

probably due to some sort of NCAA rule on number size/placement
 

cyclones500

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2010
38,803
26,810
113
Michigan
basslakebeacon.com
After a year (plus?) of prototypes and fan-buzz, I will not nitpick anything about these — except perhaps the decision to use them vs. Iowa. But, eh, whatever. We'll see them again.
 

ISUKyro

Well-Known Member
Oct 28, 2006
13,127
2,706
113
Houston, TX
After a year (plus?) of prototypes and fan-buzz, I will not nitpick anything about these — except perhaps the decision to use them vs. Iowa. But, eh, whatever. We'll see them again.
Good point, should have saved them in case we got Minni in a bowl game and then kick the **** out of them again. (but that's a lot to hope for when they are not on you schedule)
 

WalkingCY

Well-Known Member
Sep 26, 2008
6,895
2,592
113
Kansas City
probably due to some sort of NCAA rule on number size/placement

uniformx-inset-community.jpg


I was thinking like how Michigan did theirs. The white #'s are a little odd. Oh well, the jersey's are still pretty cool.
 

CyArob

Why are you the way that you are?
Apr 22, 2011
32,496
13,442
113
MN
So they're being worn for one game and then sold? Lame!
 

klamath632

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2011
12,430
323
83
To everyone who keeps bringing up the Michigan throwbacks... those numbers are against the rules starting this year. The numbers on the front have to be eight inches high. That's why they couldn't do the small numbers.
 

CyArob

Why are you the way that you are?
Apr 22, 2011
32,496
13,442
113
MN
To everyone who keeps bringing up the Michigan throwbacks... those numbers are against the rules starting this year. The numbers on the front have to be eight inches high. That's why they couldn't do the small numbers.

*Insert picture of Michigan throwback here*


But but but...
 

cyclone87

Well-Known Member
Apr 6, 2011
3,318
1,540
113
Ames, IA
To everyone who keeps bringing up the Michigan throwbacks... those numbers are against the rules starting this year. The numbers on the front have to be eight inches high. That's why they couldn't do the small numbers.

Thanks for clearing that up, figured there was a reason the numbers were that big
 

WalkingCY

Well-Known Member
Sep 26, 2008
6,895
2,592
113
Kansas City
To everyone who keeps bringing up the Michigan throwbacks... those numbers are against the rules starting this year. The numbers on the front have to be eight inches high. That's why they couldn't do the small numbers.

Ahh, I was not aware. The only thing I would do then is to bring the #'s down a bit in the center. Some Jersey #'s cover up part of the "5" line angles at their top. I wish we could see them all clearly.

Oh well, the jersey's will work. They're cool, and it will be great recognition for Jack and the time era.