Here's a question:
Why is (was) it okay to make fun of Kournikova for being just big boobs in a short skirt that can't win on the big stage, but NOT okay for people to take shots at Lolo for her looks getting her more attention than her athletic triumphs?
Remember, Kournikova had doubles titles, and was still good enough to be in those tournaments and be ranked in the world top 20 at times.
What is such a huge difference in the two situations *other than* Lolo is local to us, and probably why people are taking offense?
Why is (was) it okay to make fun of Kournikova for being just big boobs in a short skirt that can't win on the big stage, but NOT okay for people to take shots at Lolo for her looks getting her more attention than her athletic triumphs?
Remember, Kournikova had doubles titles, and was still good enough to be in those tournaments and be ranked in the world top 20 at times.
What is such a huge difference in the two situations *other than* Lolo is local to us, and probably why people are taking offense?