not for running into somebody - for "stomping on someone's leg and causing injury" (total BS, but that's what drew the card)
Yup, this is the ruling. The controversy is whether it was intentional or not, which it wasn’t based on game speed.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
not for running into somebody - for "stomping on someone's leg and causing injury" (total BS, but that's what drew the card)
"Stomp" LOLso what the hell was dumb about that post - that's what the red was for (and it was a total BS red)
Oh geez, can I PLEASE stay in your house or righteous one?You absolutely can, but know your place. Don’t come into someone’s “house” as a guest and act like a dickbag and expect to be treated kindly.
"Stomp" LOL
Weird way to spell sorry, but fine, I accept your apologies.Oh geez, can I PLEASE stay in your house or righteous one?
It doesn’t need to be intentional, which it obviously wasn’t, but it was at the very least dangerous.Yup, this is the ruling. The controversy is whether it was intentional or not, which it wasn’t based on game speed.
If that’s the rule, then why did Messi play their 2nd game?Yup, this is the ruling. The controversy is whether it was intentional or not, which it wasn’t based on game speed.
It doesn’t need to be intentional, which it obviously wasn’t, but it was at the very least dangerous.
I don’t know how you’d argue that but sure.I would argue that the Bosnian player was acting just as dangerously, coming from behind and getting physical with a player trying to reposition and catch his balance.
The rule is apparently as objective as Targeting.I would argue that the Bosnian player was acting just as dangerously, coming from behind and getting physical with a player trying to reposition and catch his balance.
Standing, with a firm voice, because that’s how you voice opposition in a civilized society.I don’t know how you’d argue that but sure.