@theshadow, How long or hard is it to get a team eligible for an NCAA season? Would it even be possible to move the women's program to this current season if the 5 for 5 rule became effective?
Women's Roster Needs/Portal
- Thread starter cy4state
- Start date
It’s already looking like a trophy contending team; and we don’t even have a full lineup.
They're really young but tons of potential. Gap year is a good thing. Most were backups behind studs or high schoolers last year
Three were NAIA national champs and one was 3rd as a freshman. So there is definitely some top end results already mixed in with the high end potential of others.
i received my info from the coaches a couples weeks ago. It appears there may be some ambiguity in what is going to be allowed.
Specifically, the implementation options currently contemplated include:
Student-athletes whose fourth season of collegiate eligibility was completed by spring 2026: No additional eligibility.
Currently enrolled student-athletes with eligibility remaining after the 2025-26 academic year: Flexibility for schools to apply the age-based model or continue with the previous eligibility rules (four seasons to compete with five total years of eligibility), whichever is most beneficial to that individual.
Prospects expected to graduate from high school in spring 2027: Age-based model only.
Prospects expected to graduate from high school in spring 2026, regardless of planned enrollment date: Age-based model only.
Prospects who graduated prior to spring 2026 and have not enrolled: The NCAA Eligibility Center will review the prospect's individual circumstances and apply the age-based model or existing delayed enrollment eligibility rules, whichever is most beneficial to that individual.
www.ncaa.org
Student-athletes whose fourth season of collegiate eligibility was completed by spring 2026: No additional eligibility.
Currently enrolled student-athletes with eligibility remaining after the 2025-26 academic year: Flexibility for schools to apply the age-based model or continue with the previous eligibility rules (four seasons to compete with five total years of eligibility), whichever is most beneficial to that individual.
Prospects expected to graduate from high school in spring 2027: Age-based model only.
Prospects expected to graduate from high school in spring 2026, regardless of planned enrollment date: Age-based model only.
Prospects who graduated prior to spring 2026 and have not enrolled: The NCAA Eligibility Center will review the prospect's individual circumstances and apply the age-based model or existing delayed enrollment eligibility rules, whichever is most beneficial to that individual.
Division I Cabinet continues discussions of age-based collegiate eligibility model - NCAA.org
The Division I Cabinet on Friday discussed possible implementation of an age-based eligibility model, should the concept ultimately be formally proposed and approved.
www.ncaa.org
While we may not be doing duals, I’m sure the coaches will be treating it like a season so the ladies will be entering tournaments at the weight they will most likely be at. Can’t let them hang out for over a year and not keep up with the weight changes they would be making during a season.
I’m guessing coaches meant it wouldn’t impacts any of their athletes. Sounds like only athletes that competed as true Freshman and have never redshirted or grey shirted could take advantage of 5 for 5.Specifically, the implementation options currently contemplated include:
Student-athletes whose fourth season of collegiate eligibility was completed by spring 2026: No additional eligibility.
Currently enrolled student-athletes with eligibility remaining after the 2025-26 academic year: Flexibility for schools to apply the age-based model or continue with the previous eligibility rules (four seasons to compete with five total years of eligibility), whichever is most beneficial to that individual.
Prospects expected to graduate from high school in spring 2027: Age-based model only.
Prospects expected to graduate from high school in spring 2026, regardless of planned enrollment date: Age-based model only.
Prospects who graduated prior to spring 2026 and have not enrolled: The NCAA Eligibility Center will review the prospect's individual circumstances and apply the age-based model or existing delayed enrollment eligibility rules, whichever is most beneficial to that individual.
Division I Cabinet continues discussions of age-based collegiate eligibility model - NCAA.org
The Division I Cabinet on Friday discussed possible implementation of an age-based eligibility model, should the concept ultimately be formally proposed and approved.
Thanks for posting!
Why rush it, especially if nobody is losing a year in the traditional sense? They'll all still get to compete.
Looks like they had 5 girls in for junior day visits
Brooke Huffman Matscouts #15 p4p, #1 190, Flo #1 190
Eve Scrocki Matscouts #2 145, Flo #3 145
Ryleigh Sturgill #14 p4p, #5 Matscouts, Flo #1 100
Jacylyn Bouzakis MatScouts #2 p4p, #2 110, Flo #1 105
Ciyanna Okocha Mat Scouts #3 170, Flo #3 155
Yzabella Austin '26 class. Matscouts #38 senior big board, Matscouts #7 140, Flo #13 140 visited a couple weeks ago
Matscouts put out 26-27 rankings and big board, this week, Final 25-26 big board was a month ago. Flo has been 4 months since their 25-26 rankings. 26-27 hasnt been put out yet, Their p4p big board is a couple years old so I didn't list it.
Brooke Huffman Matscouts #15 p4p, #1 190, Flo #1 190
Eve Scrocki Matscouts #2 145, Flo #3 145
Ryleigh Sturgill #14 p4p, #5 Matscouts, Flo #1 100
Jacylyn Bouzakis MatScouts #2 p4p, #2 110, Flo #1 105
Ciyanna Okocha Mat Scouts #3 170, Flo #3 155
Yzabella Austin '26 class. Matscouts #38 senior big board, Matscouts #7 140, Flo #13 140 visited a couple weeks ago
Matscouts put out 26-27 rankings and big board, this week, Final 25-26 big board was a month ago. Flo has been 4 months since their 25-26 rankings. 26-27 hasnt been put out yet, Their p4p big board is a couple years old so I didn't list it.
The tagged wrestlers are
Emma Bacon Matscouts #11 p4p
Taina Fernandez MatScouts #1 p4p
Violette Lasure MatScouts #4 p4p
Juliet Alt #6 170 (‘28)
Lot of talent in campus this week
Emma Bacon Matscouts #11 p4p
Taina Fernandez MatScouts #1 p4p
Violette Lasure MatScouts #4 p4p
Juliet Alt #6 170 (‘28)
Lot of talent in campus this week
Isabella Miller and Ella Poalillo were also on official visits. Not in front of my computer so don’t have p4p
Flo has Miller as #9 at 130 (just behind Brooklyn Perez) and Poalillo #1 at 155
MatScouts is Miller #3 135
Poalillo #5 overall p4p
St. John has the Matecouts #1,2,4,5,11,15,15 p4p on campus. Along with with #3 135, #2 145, #3 170
Let's get a bunch of them to commit and just become the Penn State of Womens wrestling
| Wt | Name (Yr) |
|---|---|
| 103 | Makennah Craft (SO) |
| 110 | |
| 117 | Christianah Ogunsanya (JR) |
| 124 | Molly Allen (SO); Gabriella Gomez (SO) |
| 131 | Brooklyn Perez (FR); Persaeus Gomez (SO); Jumoke Adekoye (JR) |
| 138 | Esther Kolawole (JR) |
| 145 | Daniella Nugent (SO); Greta Brus (FR) |
| 160 | Alezandra Robles (FR) |
| 180 | Piper Fowler (SO) |
| 207 |
I am liking this Nigeria to Ames pipeline
