Agree, Thamel should be thoroughly roasted for that verbiage in his post.None of the above posted information requires TT to play him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Agree, Thamel should be thoroughly roasted for that verbiage in his post.None of the above posted information requires TT to play him.
Prove they have no legal ground?Tech can try to sue but a judge would throw it out on the account they don't have legal ground to stand on.
What about Dekkers? Did he also not play? Did he too have an addiction?Now do Hunter Dekkers
Where does it say they have to play Tech? Tech in theory could try to sue using anti-trust or collusion but they would have to show harm which is sort of impossible when you don't own your media rights.Prove they have no legal ground?
Many non-conference opponents are already scheduled for several years out, and I would guess that there are contracts that govern those games. If the opponents back out of an existing contracted game, that opponent would be breaking a contract, which is grounds for a lawsuit.But where does Tech have legal ground? You just can't sue because your feelings are hurt.
Funny they could try to sue on that but have no problem with Sorsby breaking his contract with the NCAA and the schools he played for.Many non-conference opponents are already scheduled for several years out, and I would guess that there are contracts that govern those games. If the opponents back out of an existing contracted game, that opponent would breaking a contract, which is grounds for a lawsuit.
So in two minutes you combed through your legal library and found there is no legal groundWhere does it say they have to play Tech? Tech in theory could try to sue using anti-trust or collusion but they would have to show harm which is sort of impossible when you don't own your media rights.
You're the one who shared the link saying they would sue. I asked what legal ground and you didn't answer. So, again, what legal grounds would they sue on?So in two minutes you combed through your legal library and found there is no legal ground
Please share your AI code for that
It is what it is...Funny they could try to sue on that but have no problem with Sorsby breaking his contract with the NCAA and the schools he played for.
The legal system doesn't typically look too fondly on people trying to talk out both sides of their mouth.It is what it is...
That’s non con games get cancelled all the time, the language in there is pretty light and outside of having to pay a small fee to some G5 schools this has never been a sticking point beforeMany non-conference opponents are already scheduled for several years out, and I would guess that there are contracts that govern those games. If the opponents back out of an existing contracted game, that opponent would be breaking a contract, which is grounds for a lawsuit.
TT offered to break a contract (pay off) to play Texas.Many non-conference opponents are already scheduled for several years out, and I would guess that there are contracts that govern those games. If the opponents back out of an existing contracted game, that opponent would be breaking a contract, which is grounds for a lawsuit.
It’s much more sound to say there could be, given the statement, than saying there isn’t.You're the one who shared the link saying they would sue. I asked what legal ground and you didn't answer. So, again, what legal grounds would they sue on?
The legal system doesn't typically look too fondly on people trying to talk out both sides of their mouth.
So you don't have an answer? Gotcha.It’s much more sound to say there could be, given the statement, than saying there isn’t.
Your position requires us to not only know more about law than is implied in the statement, it requires us to know every single aspect of law.
They can spend all the money they want on lawyers but you just can't walk into a civil courtroom and proclaim to sue someone because they refuse to play you.But also, the legal system does benefit those with money or those that have friends with money. So, don’t get too excited. Campbell can hire another sleazy lawyer to make this go away.
I don’t know what to think. Texas tech is arguably the richest big 12 school, I don’t know if it would be smart to refuse to play them. They might bolt out of the big 12 the first chance they get if conference teams refuse to play them.
TT apparently just said they may consider making it a sticking point. And if I have read correctly, some ADs are proposing that the boycotts of TT go beyond football. Last year, TT MBB played several P4 teams in the non-con.That’s non con games get cancelled all the time, the language in there is pretty light and outside of having to pay a small fee to some G5 schools this has never been a sticking point before
They can spend all the money they want on lawyers but you just can't walk into a civil courtroom and proclaim to sue someone because they refuse to play you.
they’re notThe legal system doesn't typically look too fondly on people trying to talk out both sides of their mouth.