So It Begins... Private Equity in CFB

The Saudis, UAE, and Qatar know the oil will eventually run dry and they are spending boatloads of money into alternative energy, sports, entertainment, etc. People will wake up one day and realize they own everything and it will be too late.
Most people don't realize UAE controls the shipping pots of New York, Miami, NOLA, Savannah and a few others.
 
Don't worry, guys, when I win the lottery, I will start a mining company in Africa (my country of Origin), then tie our School sponsorship to gold produced from my mine, and dollars will be flowing in for ISU. We will be getting any player we want as long as they fit into our Coaches' plans and program. It's going to happen. Be optimistic. I just need to hit that combination. With your prayers, nothing is impossible.
Are you that Nigerian Prince that has been emailing me? I’m waiting for my money.
 
Disagree, it was insane. A lot of places I’d park for free after 7pm became $8/hr parking 24/7. I already used cta/bike but went to using it exclusively and renting out my parking. This stuff can have horrific consequences.
I have no knowledge of Chicago's situation but there is a school of thought that this is what should happen right up to where there is a very small amount of parking available at any one time. Maximizes the churn and gets a return on a public investment.
 
I'm not a finance guy, so I don't get it. Would a 500M PE investment not involve an expected 50MM to 100MM annual return? What possible advantage is there to this other than the obvious short term gain? Seems like the only possible paths to grow a college football team or athletic department are better TV deals, undiscovered revenue or extracting more money from more or existing donors and fans. Since the media deal is locked up for the foreseeable future, it can't be that. I find it hard to believe any stones have been left unturned as far as revenue streams go, so either they believe they can get more out of existing support or they're going to go around SLC and poke holes in all the rubbers so that in 25 years, they have more supporters?

Let's say they use that and buy rosters. Do they think that playoff berths or even national championships would increase their value?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: HFCS
I'm not a finance guy, so I don't get it. Would a 500M PE investment not involve an expected 50MM to 100MM annual return? What possible advantage is there to this other than the obvious short term gain? Seems like the only possible paths to grow a college football team or athletic department are better TV deals, undiscovered revenue or extracting more money from more or existing donors and fans. Since the media deal is locked up for the foreseeable future, it can't be that. I find it hard to believe any stones have been left unturned as far as revenue streams go, so either they believe they can get more out of existing support or they're going to go around SLC and poke holes in all the rubbers so that in 25 years, they have more supporters?

Let's say they use that and buy rosters. Do they think that playoff berths or even national championships would increase their value?
My guess is they are planning to use this money in the short-term to field high-level teams in advance of the next big conference shake-ups to secure an invite to the Big 10
 
The best thing about PE is they immediately know everything about how to run your business even though they've never done it at any point in their executive's lives. It's one hell of a skill to have.
Yep..went through it twice and the first meetings always went " nothing is going to change". Then they proceeded to change everything especially cutting people who knew the business and industry. Pretty much cutting salary and never reinvesting in business. And both of my experiences were with two of the largest PE firms in the US. Both left our balance sheets with huge debt and walked away after cashing in when we went public. My opinion is they are a cancer.
 
I'm not a finance guy, so I don't get it. Would a 500M PE investment not involve an expected 50MM to 100MM annual return? What possible advantage is there to this other than the obvious short term gain? Seems like the only possible paths to grow a college football team or athletic department are better TV deals, undiscovered revenue or extracting more money from more or existing donors and fans. Since the media deal is locked up for the foreseeable future, it can't be that. I find it hard to believe any stones have been left unturned as far as revenue streams go, so either they believe they can get more out of existing support or they're going to go around SLC and poke holes in all the rubbers so that in 25 years, they have more supporters?

Let's say they use that and buy rosters. Do they think that playoff berths or even national championships would increase their value?
It truly is a risky investment. You can buy athletes. You can buy coaches. But even with those your odds, imo, still don't match the ROI risk assessment. This always puzzled me. I'm not sure of the legal ramifications of writing off the losses, which for many companies is a wash. But as an investment, I can't see it.
 
My guess is they are planning to use this money in the short-term to field high-level teams in advance of the next big conference shake-ups to secure an invite to the Big 10
The funny is only because they've been spurned once they'll be spurned again.
 
My guess is they are planning to use this money in the short-term to field high-level teams in advance of the next big conference shake-ups to secure an invite to the Big 10

What's the plan if the Big Ten doesn't want them and/or they don't make the Super League?
 
My guess is they are planning to use this money in the short-term to field high-level teams in advance of the next big conference shake-ups to secure an invite to the Big 10

If it's even still called the Big Ten or SEC, it might be called something different to look less like Iowa, NW, Miss St, Vandy and Rutgers are getting kicked out. Of course just winning could help be on the correct side of that choice but unlike Indiana, Utah seems quite incapable of winning the conference they promised they'd dominate and has made a real case for being dead last 16 of 16 in mens basketball.
 
Yep..went through it twice and the first meetings always went " nothing is going to change". Then they proceeded to change everything especially cutting people who knew the business and industry. Pretty much cutting salary and never reinvesting in business. And both of my experiences were with two of the largest PE firms in the US. Both left our balance sheets with huge debt and walked away after cashing in when we went public. My opinion is they are a cancer.
I'm in that fog right now. I know I'm expensive and I'm just waiting for an offer that makes it worth it to go away...
 
  • Sad
Reactions: ScottyP
They take on leveraged buyouts meaning the company they're buying puts up the money for a significant portion of the purchase price and the PE firm funds the rest. The C suite doesn't care about the debt because they're taking the bags of cash from the PE firm and getting out of dodge.

They sell the assets, rent them back to the company, extract as much money as possible in management fees, offshore or move the money and fold on the remaining debt. They get huge paychecks and the entity they purchased folds.

It's really ******* stupid and PE is a death sentence for anything they touch. The product will get worse until the day of its demise where is no longer exists. They have other schemes but this is the money maker.
This is what happened at my last company. PE bought the company, grabbed the bank accounts, sold the buildings, rented them back, fired the executives (including me), tried to run the company on a shoestring (cutting manufacturing supplies beyond hurting), lost the biggest customer in the process, split up and sold the remaining businesses. A massive cluster and many of my friends were left scrambling to find new jobs. While some PE may actually be beneficial, most seem to be slash and burn.

I ended up getting a MEd and taught Math & Stat at a small college till retirement. Teaching was emotionally rewarding but not really financially rewarding. I did not care, I covered my bills and had a much calmer life.
 
I have no knowledge of Chicago's situation but there is a school of thought that this is what should happen right up to where there is a very small amount of parking available at any one time. Maximizes the churn and gets a return on a public investment.
The return goes to the PE, not the city.
 
If it's even still called the Big Ten or SEC, it might be called something different to look less like Iowa, NW, Miss St, Vandy and Rutgers are getting kicked out. Of course just winning could help be on the correct side of that choice but unlike Indiana, Utah seems quite incapable of winning the conference they promised they'd dominate and has made a real case for being dead last 16 of 16 in mens basketball.
They want to invest all of the PE money in football only to be a consistent winner for the next several years to get into the Big 10.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: GTO
They want to invest all of the PE money in football only to be a consistent winner for the next several years to get into the Big 10.
The only way they get an invite (and I kinda doubt that even happens) is if the playoff expands even more or if they go full SMU and don’t get a cut of the media dollars.