Utah is a classic “one coach away” program. Just like the rest of us. Whitingham is 20 years older than CMC. I think the Clownzano/Wilner camp pumping the “easier route to the playoff” narrative is ******** cope. The lack of funds is going to catch up to sooner rather than later. You can’t stake a financial future on that play for Utah. Really only applies to Oregon imo.
Washington gets thrown around a lot as a “big dog national program” but I disagree. They are a big dog regional team in a region with generally ****** football. Two steps below the tOSU/Michigan/USC/ND/SEC gang imo. One step below OU/FSU/PSU/Oregon. On par with the Iowa/Miami/Texas brigade.
This is purely from a footballing results/results that can potentially be obtained.
First group is making the playoff quite often, chance to win it.
Second group great chance to make the playoff, unlikely to win it.
Third group hoping to pop up and make the playoff once every so often.
I think back when both were WAC/MWC and state’s population boom started there was obvious untapped cfb potential that Utah did actually realize both in MWC and Pac. We saw it up close when they drubbed us in Ames.
Now with both of them moving “up” I totally agree w the “one coach away” thing. Either BYU or Utah could be great or suck with any given coaching hire. I don’t see it as some automatic winning situation but it is slightly better for both programs than some other historically major conference schools.
I’m failing to see any advantage Utah has long term over BYU and the fact that fandom seems somewhat even in the state AFTER Utah’s multi decade run of fb success (and byu being mostly just average) suggests BYU is the bigger get with higher ceiling.