****! They are they going to sell the Big12 google history!!? Bowlsby better be worried.... God only knows what he was searching for....They get rights to data.
****! They are they going to sell the Big12 google history!!? Bowlsby better be worried.... God only knows what he was searching for....They get rights to data.
Data and stats that gamblers are willing to pay for im guessing.What's a 'data rights' package even mean?
Wouldn't that be public information? I guess I don't know what sports bettors would be paying that isn't in public domain...Data and stats that gamblers are willing to pay for im guessing.
Some of the macro data might be easy to compile but not the more advanced stuff. I believe NFL and MLB make a decent penny on their official stats used in fantasy leages.Wouldn't that be public information? I guess I don't know what sports bettors would be paying that isn't in public domain...
Read the article, it’s pretty straight forward I think.What does that mean? Im braindead today. Selling Data?
Sign your soul away to the devil.What's a 'data rights' package even mean?
Out of curiosity, why? It’s already completely baked into sports culture.I know gambling drives engagement, but for me it makes it more likely I’ll check out.
“Either it’s going to be good… or it’s going to be bad. Or maybe it won’t be anything at all. Time will tell”Well Wilner is starting to hedge his bet. Reminds me of the meteorologist in Central Iowa who forecasted 1-8 inches of snow for our area not long ago.
I agree with all of this. I do wonder if there is some downside or thing we’re missing as zero power conferences have this data sharing agreement yet. Could just be the Big12 is leading the way on it but it’s a bit random.I'm definitely pro-gambling as it drives engagement and can provide another revenue stream to help our athletes. But I will say that it's annoying watching the XFL and hearing the announcers talk about the spread on every damn drive, almost as if there isn't an actual football game being played.
As long as selling the Big 12's data rights doesn't impact the way the game is covered (which I don't see why it would), then I don't see any harm in making money off of data that we're presumably already collecting anyway.
You lost me at “Watching the XFL”. My brain can’t process that.I'm definitely pro-gambling as it drives engagement and can provide another revenue stream to help our athletes. But I will say that it's annoying watching the XFL and hearing the announcers talk about the spread on every damn drive, almost as if there isn't an actual football game being played.
As long as selling the Big 12's data rights doesn't impact the way the game is covered (which I don't see why it would), then I don't see any harm in making money off of data that we're presumably already collecting anyway.
Kind of what Pick Six said. It’s invading quite a bit of the content that’s created around sports and those sports discussions.Out of curiosity, why? It’s already completely baked into sports culture.
I think you better be real careful about making agreements with data rights involving gambling entities, it can really cause some ethical concerns imo.I agree with all of this. I do wonder if there is some downside or thing we’re missing as zero power conferences have this data sharing agreement yet. Could just be the Big12 is leading the way on it but it’s a bit random.
I promise I’m not trolling but again out of curiosity what would the ethical concerns be? The data is all public, it’s just the official data they are getting from what I understandI think you better be real careful about making agreements with data rights involving gambling entities, it can really cause some ethical concerns imo.
Ah gotcha. Will have to do when time allowsRead the article, it’s pretty straight forward I think.
Kind of what Pick Six said. It’s invading quite a bit of the content that’s created around sports and those sports discussions.
Basically you’re directly creating a financial relationship between the conference and the gambling entities, there’s no more middleman there theoretically. You now have a reason for direct communications, relationships, etc. you also create an incentive for the conference to promote gaming, and the demand for those statistics.I promise I’m not trolling but again out of curiosity what would the ethical concerns be? The data is all public, it’s just the official data they are getting from what I understand