Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)

PickSix

Well-Known Member
Aug 25, 2013
865
1,369
93
I'm definitely pro-gambling as it drives engagement and can provide another revenue stream to help our athletes. But I will say that it's annoying watching the XFL and hearing the announcers talk about the spread on every damn drive, almost as if there isn't an actual football game being played.

As long as selling the Big 12's data rights doesn't impact the way the game is covered (which I don't see why it would), then I don't see any harm in making money off of data that we're presumably already collecting anyway.
 

FerShizzle

person slash genius
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Feb 5, 2013
16,072
19,996
113
Des Moines
Well Wilner is starting to hedge his bet. Reminds me of the meteorologist in Central Iowa who forecasted 1-8 inches of snow for our area not long ago.
“Either it’s going to be good… or it’s going to be bad. Or maybe it won’t be anything at all. Time will tell”

paraphrasing obviously
 
  • Funny
Reactions: Acylum

FriendlySpartan

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2021
9,611
10,101
113
38
I'm definitely pro-gambling as it drives engagement and can provide another revenue stream to help our athletes. But I will say that it's annoying watching the XFL and hearing the announcers talk about the spread on every damn drive, almost as if there isn't an actual football game being played.

As long as selling the Big 12's data rights doesn't impact the way the game is covered (which I don't see why it would), then I don't see any harm in making money off of data that we're presumably already collecting anyway.
I agree with all of this. I do wonder if there is some downside or thing we’re missing as zero power conferences have this data sharing agreement yet. Could just be the Big12 is leading the way on it but it’s a bit random.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyfanatic

AuH2O

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2013
12,999
20,961
113
I'm definitely pro-gambling as it drives engagement and can provide another revenue stream to help our athletes. But I will say that it's annoying watching the XFL and hearing the announcers talk about the spread on every damn drive, almost as if there isn't an actual football game being played.

As long as selling the Big 12's data rights doesn't impact the way the game is covered (which I don't see why it would), then I don't see any harm in making money off of data that we're presumably already collecting anyway.
You lost me at “Watching the XFL”. My brain can’t process that.
 

simply1

Rec Center HOF
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 10, 2009
45,688
34,435
113
Pdx
I agree with all of this. I do wonder if there is some downside or thing we’re missing as zero power conferences have this data sharing agreement yet. Could just be the Big12 is leading the way on it but it’s a bit random.
I think you better be real careful about making agreements with data rights involving gambling entities, it can really cause some ethical concerns imo.
 

FriendlySpartan

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2021
9,611
10,101
113
38
I think you better be real careful about making agreements with data rights involving gambling entities, it can really cause some ethical concerns imo.
I promise I’m not trolling but again out of curiosity what would the ethical concerns be? The data is all public, it’s just the official data they are getting from what I understand
 

CascadeClone

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2009
10,878
13,957
113
Kind of what Pick Six said. It’s invading quite a bit of the content that’s created around sports and those sports discussions.

Remember when Brent Mussberger would tap-dance around comments on the gambling lines? "The guys in Vegas" and such, but never actually say "line" or "point spread" etc...

Pepperidge Farms remembers, but those days are GONE.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aeroclone

simply1

Rec Center HOF
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 10, 2009
45,688
34,435
113
Pdx
I promise I’m not trolling but again out of curiosity what would the ethical concerns be? The data is all public, it’s just the official data they are getting from what I understand
Basically you’re directly creating a financial relationship between the conference and the gambling entities, there’s no more middleman there theoretically. You now have a reason for direct communications, relationships, etc. you also create an incentive for the conference to promote gaming, and the demand for those statistics.