I was asking specifically about Ankeny because certain channels are only available in certain zip codes. I was only asking about a particular channel, hence asking about Ankeny.What if you don't live in Ankeny? Should Adel have its own thread?
I was asking specifically about Ankeny because certain channels are only available in certain zip codes. I was only asking about a particular channel, hence asking about Ankeny.What if you don't live in Ankeny? Should Adel have its own thread?
I was asking specifically about Ankeny because certain channels are only available in certain zip codes. I was only asking about a particular channel, hence asking about Ankeny.
It does not run well on 11 year old hardware, no. I bought a FireTV box for my other TV that the PS4 is not plugged into. Works really wellI started the 5 day free trial for the PlayStation Vue and I can say that I really like it. It seems to run without issue on my PS4, however it has some serious lag issues on my PS3. Does anyone else have problems with Vue not running very well on the PS3?
I started the 5 day free trial for the PlayStation Vue and I can say that I really like it. It seems to run without issue on my PS4, however it has some serious lag issues on my PS3. Does anyone else have problems with Vue not running very well on the PS3?
I just received a similar email. I have the next package up from you, and it is also increasing by $10. I'm probably going to consider exploring other options in 3 months, because I'm not happy about paying more money for fewer channels than I had when I switched to Vue last year.Just got an email saying that the Slim package is increasing from 29.99 to 39.99 for new subscribers. My increase will begin in three months.
I was planning to change my package once football season began anyway, but maybe that package is increasing too.
Also, I recently purchased a fire TV box, and it's so much better than the Roku.
At least they don't have contracts I guess. Mine is going up from 65 to 75. I'm sure this won't be the last increase we'll see in the near future as companies try to recover the lost revenues from their cable/satellite business models.
I was just looking into this when I saw the announcement. I thought I read they are just getting rid of the slim packages, but the non-slim packages weren't changing, so if a user was already using a non-slim, they wouldn't see an increase. Is this not true?
I still have DirecTV but it's insane (not at the bickering stage yet). Was looking through the Vue Elite package, and comparing it to my DTV favorites list. Seems the lineup is pretty comparable, at more than half the price. It does seem to be missing some of the channels my kids like (i.e. Nickelodeon...at least I didn't see it). Also only KCCI as far as local channels.
Still debating.
I hope so too. I get KCCI through PSVue and the signal I get through an antenna is way better. And my "antenna" is a coax cable with the end jammed into a screw on the back of my tv. Which works great by the way.PS Vue is adding local channels to the majority of the markets across the country. The extra $10 is to cover the re-trans fees to the local affiliates and of course the parent network gets their cut as well. The re-trans fees along with advertising is how Fox, CBS, NBC, ABC can bid crazy amounts for sports rights to keep up with ESPN and FS1. I would look for the other OTT providers to adjust pricing as well as they add more local channels across the country. Too much money at stake for the major networks to lose out on the re-trans fees as people cut the cord.
The 2 great things is that there are 4-5 OTT streaming providers to use and no contracts so you can easily vote with your wallet and move on if they start jacking with prices too much. A far cry from the 2-yr contracts of the cable / satellite TV companies..
I really hope that an OTT service will provide the option to NOT have the local channels for a lower rate for those of us that can use an antenna to get OTA signals for free. I get a ton more stations OTA along with a lot of substations with a lot better picture quality and sound quality.
I hope so too. I get KCCI through PSVue and the signal I get through an antenna is way better. And my "antenna" is a coax cable with the end jammed into a screw on the back of my tv. Which works great by the way.
PS Vue is adding local channels to the majority of the markets across the country. The extra $10 is to cover the re-trans fees to the local affiliates and of course the parent network gets their cut as well. The re-trans fees along with advertising is how Fox, CBS, NBC, ABC can bid crazy amounts for sports rights to keep up with ESPN and FS1. I would look for the other OTT providers to adjust pricing as well as they add more local channels across the country. Too much money at stake for the major networks to lose out on the re-trans fees as people cut the cord.
The 2 great things is that there are 4-5 OTT streaming providers to use and no contracts so you can easily vote with your wallet and move on if they start jacking with prices too much. A far cry from the 2-yr contracts of the cable / satellite TV companies..
I really hope that an OTT service will provide the option to NOT have the local channels for a lower rate for those of us that can use an antenna to get OTA signals for free. I get a ton more stations OTA along with a lot of substations with a lot better picture quality and sound quality.
Denver market???