Lima is a 3rd rounded at worst if he plays for Iowa and has the same performance.
There’s a bias against ISU and I don’t know how to break it. Thought the success of Montgomery and Lazard would help more.
Can someone sum up the study because it seems to me, we've had average or worse coaching for so long that not only did we not recruit well, but we also didn't develop our kids well. Is it supposed to surprise us that programs that have had long term success attract better athletes, can provide those athletes better coaching, and have better support services for those athletes and that those athletes have better opportunities to play professionally? I'm not convinced we're being screwed but I am convinced we haven't been good enough to get the benefit of the doubt.