That's only 3 more and all they have to do is to slow the game down
When was the last time we lost 4 games in Hilton in one year?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's only 3 more and all they have to do is to slow the game down
I don't know why some people are down on Monte, saying he isn't playing how they thought he would. He's doing a exactly what he's done the last 3years.
He can score in the flow of the game, but he's never been a 1 on 1 scorer. Not sure why people were suddenly expecting that.
Lard playing this year will benefit him next year when we'll need him, it would be very good for the team's future.8-10...
If Lard doesn't redshirt and plays...8-10
.
.
.in otherwords...redshirting Lard will be a good thing for the team's future and a very good thing for a kid trying to acclimate himself to university life.
2010-11...the most recent comparable team.When was the last time we lost 4 games in Hilton in one year?
When was the last time we lost 4 games in Hilton in one year?
2010-11...the most recent comparable team.
That team lost 12 games by 6 points or less (or in OT) irrc.
That team had a better backcourt and no worse of a front court. Imo that team was superior on offense. We give good effort on defense this year, but to rely on winning via good defense over a Big 12 schedule requires more than effort. We've been awfully close to being .500 in Big 12 several times in the past 5 years, with better teams. Even a small regression likely results in being a few games under.That team was so much worse than this team it's not even close. This is the best defensive team we've had in a decade
This board needs Big 12 season to begin in a BIG way (obviously with a convincing win against TTU). No doubt the team has left a sour taste in everyone's mouth over the past few weeks, but I still feel good about this team coming together.
That team had a better backcourt and no worse of a front court. Imo that team was superior on offense. We give good effort on defense this year, but to rely on winning via good defense over a Big 12 schedule requires more than effort. We've been awfully close to being .500 in Big 12 several times in the past 5 years, with better teams. Even a small regression likely results in being a few games under.
Your optimism is noble, but also an extreme extrapolation of distorted data.
I don't necessarily think we will lose three more home games this year, but do you know how many coaches Iowa State has had since Hilton opened that have never lost 4+ home games in a season? Zero.People predicting 4 losses in Hilton in one year are crazy
I'll bet the first taker that we do lose 4 at home this year. $20.People predicting 4 losses in Hilton in one year are crazy
To me, 4 would be the over/under line. If we lose less than 4 I will be stoked.I'll bet the first taker that we do lose 4 at home this year. $20.
Probably just unfair expectations that he's going to step into the alpha role seamlessly. It took a while for Royce, Clyburn and others to do it. Kane hit the ground running in that role to some extent, but when you have Niang, Ejim, Hogue it sure helps, and he had a rough patch in early conference play. He's played a similar role with gradually increased responsibility for three years. This is a big jump and it will take a while. May never happen but I think it will click.I don't know why some people are down on Monte, saying he isn't
No, the line would be 3.5.To me, 4 would be the over/under line. If we lose less than 4 I will be stoked.
I was referring to what the Vegas line would probably be. I think if it has to be on a half game as an over/under, it would be just as likely that Vegas would set it at 4.5 as 3.5. You personally can set whatever line you want!No, the line would be 3.5.
I said, "I'll bet the first taker that we do lose 4 at home this year. $20."
4 losses is a "win" for me since it would match what I said.
You can reconsider on these terms.
I hope I lose.
My bad. I thought you were betting me after changing the terms.I was referring to what the Vegas line would probably be. I think if it has to be on a half game as an over/under, it would be just as likely that Vegas would set it at 4.5 as 3.5. You personally can set whatever line you want!KenPomery has us as underdogs at home to KU, WVU and Baylor and we have had better Cyclone teams lose to Baylor at home the last two years. Not convinced this team can feed off the Magic this year in regards to being able to score. Defense is decent, but offense will struggle IMO.
Lard playing this year will benefit him next year when we'll need him, it would be very good for the team's future.
If he's good enough to help this year he should absolutely play, and if it's a wash he should still see some developmental time.